{"title":"在锡卡地区建设弗朗斯-塞达机场过程中解决土地冲突,实现国家安全","authors":"Andreas Gama Lusi, Arifudin Uksan, M. A. Madjid","doi":"10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of Frans Seda Airport land addition as a strategic tourism and economic door is faced with a conflict. The problems that occur are caused by the transfer of community agrarian land that is converted by the government. The transfer of land ownership or land chosen by the community was not in line with the cost of land compensation that was provided, causing conflict escalation. The purpose of this research is to describe the conflict resolution of Frans Seda Airport Development in Sikka Regency to realize national security. The method used is a qualitative method with a descriptive approach through literature study. Based on the results of the research, it can be understood that the phenomenon of land conversion that occurs in Sikka Regency as a result of the airport development policy has several social impacts. The impacts are the shift of agrarian land into additional land for the airport, the loss of agricultural land as a source of livelihood for the surrounding community, the emergence of pro and contra attitudes in the community, and the emergence of social conflicts. The social conflicts are between the pro and con communities (horizontal conflict), and the contra communities, and the Sikka regional government (vertical conflict). Peace efforts were made by both government and non-government institutions. The Sikka Regional Government made persuasive efforts to mediate the conflicting parties. Litigation as a resolution is then initiated with dialogue, negotiation, and individual approaches, as well as maximizing compensation and community empowerment. Resolution orientation to conflict transformation is dominant in mediating conflicts. It is hoped that this research will contribute to encouraging functional groups to formulate a cross-sectoral, integrated, and coordinated agrarian conflict resolution mechanism for the development of public interests.","PeriodicalId":356487,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)","volume":"2017 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agrarian Conflict Resolution In The Construction Of Frans Seda Airport In Sikka Regency To Realize National Security\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Gama Lusi, Arifudin Uksan, M. A. Madjid\",\"doi\":\"10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of Frans Seda Airport land addition as a strategic tourism and economic door is faced with a conflict. The problems that occur are caused by the transfer of community agrarian land that is converted by the government. The transfer of land ownership or land chosen by the community was not in line with the cost of land compensation that was provided, causing conflict escalation. The purpose of this research is to describe the conflict resolution of Frans Seda Airport Development in Sikka Regency to realize national security. The method used is a qualitative method with a descriptive approach through literature study. Based on the results of the research, it can be understood that the phenomenon of land conversion that occurs in Sikka Regency as a result of the airport development policy has several social impacts. The impacts are the shift of agrarian land into additional land for the airport, the loss of agricultural land as a source of livelihood for the surrounding community, the emergence of pro and contra attitudes in the community, and the emergence of social conflicts. The social conflicts are between the pro and con communities (horizontal conflict), and the contra communities, and the Sikka regional government (vertical conflict). Peace efforts were made by both government and non-government institutions. The Sikka Regional Government made persuasive efforts to mediate the conflicting parties. Litigation as a resolution is then initiated with dialogue, negotiation, and individual approaches, as well as maximizing compensation and community empowerment. Resolution orientation to conflict transformation is dominant in mediating conflicts. It is hoped that this research will contribute to encouraging functional groups to formulate a cross-sectoral, integrated, and coordinated agrarian conflict resolution mechanism for the development of public interests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)\",\"volume\":\"2017 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.983\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i5.983","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
弗朗斯-塞达机场新增土地作为战略性旅游和经济门户的开发面临着冲突。出现这些问题的原因是政府对社区耕地的转让。土地所有权的转让或社区选择的土地与提供的土地补偿成本不符,导致冲突升级。本研究的目的是描述 Sikka 县 Frans Seda 机场开发的冲突解决情况,以实现国家安全。采用的方法是定性方法,通过文献研究进行描述。根据研究结果,可以了解到机场开发政策导致的锡卡地区土地转换现象产生了多种社会影响。这些影响包括:农用土地转变为机场的新增用地、作为周边社区生计来源的农用土地的丧失、社区中赞成和反对态度的出现以及社会冲突的出现。社会冲突发生在支持社区和反对社区之间(横向冲突),以及反对社区和锡卡地区政府之间(纵向冲突)。政府和非政府机构都做出了和平努力。锡卡地区政府努力说服调解冲突各方。然后,通过对话、谈判、个别处理以及最大限度地补偿和社区赋权等方式,启动诉讼作为解决方案。冲突转化的解决导向在调解冲突中占主导地位。希望本研究有助于鼓励职能小组制定跨部门、综合协调的土地冲突解决机制,以促进公共利益的发展。
Agrarian Conflict Resolution In The Construction Of Frans Seda Airport In Sikka Regency To Realize National Security
The development of Frans Seda Airport land addition as a strategic tourism and economic door is faced with a conflict. The problems that occur are caused by the transfer of community agrarian land that is converted by the government. The transfer of land ownership or land chosen by the community was not in line with the cost of land compensation that was provided, causing conflict escalation. The purpose of this research is to describe the conflict resolution of Frans Seda Airport Development in Sikka Regency to realize national security. The method used is a qualitative method with a descriptive approach through literature study. Based on the results of the research, it can be understood that the phenomenon of land conversion that occurs in Sikka Regency as a result of the airport development policy has several social impacts. The impacts are the shift of agrarian land into additional land for the airport, the loss of agricultural land as a source of livelihood for the surrounding community, the emergence of pro and contra attitudes in the community, and the emergence of social conflicts. The social conflicts are between the pro and con communities (horizontal conflict), and the contra communities, and the Sikka regional government (vertical conflict). Peace efforts were made by both government and non-government institutions. The Sikka Regional Government made persuasive efforts to mediate the conflicting parties. Litigation as a resolution is then initiated with dialogue, negotiation, and individual approaches, as well as maximizing compensation and community empowerment. Resolution orientation to conflict transformation is dominant in mediating conflicts. It is hoped that this research will contribute to encouraging functional groups to formulate a cross-sectoral, integrated, and coordinated agrarian conflict resolution mechanism for the development of public interests.