{"title":"不锈钢上的 TiAlN 和 AlCrN 涂层的摩擦学特性","authors":"E. Dalibon, A. J. Maskavizan, S. Brühl","doi":"10.1177/02670844241241120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"TiAlN and AlCrN coatings are widely used in applications that require high stress resistance. In this work, the tribological behaviour of physical vapour deposition (PVD) TiAlN and AlCrN commercial coatings deposited on AISI martensitic stainless steel is studied. Microstructure of the coatings was analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and nanohardness was measured. Pin-on-disk and abrasive wear tests were performed. Adhesion was evaluated using Rockwell C Indentation and scratch test. The thickness of both coatings was approximately 3 µm. AlCrN lost 30 and 10 times less volume than TiAlN in pin-on-disk tests, under low and high loads, respectively. The steady friction coefficient value was also lower. This indicated that the AlCrN coating had a better performance under sliding conditions. On the other hand, the mass loss was similar for both coatings under abrasive wear, even under severe conditions. In the scratch tests, TiAlN coating failed at 60 N load and AlCrN coating at 70 N, the latter showing a higher value of critical load. The deformation was similar for both coatings as it could be observed in the profiles obtained by a mechanical profilometer at 60 N, however, AlCrN did not show film delamination. This enhanced performance can be attributed to higher fracture toughness and load carrying capacity, which not only improved the mechanical properties of the coating but also its adhesion to the stainless-steel substrate.","PeriodicalId":21995,"journal":{"name":"Surface Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tribological behaviour of TiAlN and AlCrN coatings on stainless steel\",\"authors\":\"E. Dalibon, A. J. Maskavizan, S. Brühl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02670844241241120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"TiAlN and AlCrN coatings are widely used in applications that require high stress resistance. In this work, the tribological behaviour of physical vapour deposition (PVD) TiAlN and AlCrN commercial coatings deposited on AISI martensitic stainless steel is studied. Microstructure of the coatings was analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and nanohardness was measured. Pin-on-disk and abrasive wear tests were performed. Adhesion was evaluated using Rockwell C Indentation and scratch test. The thickness of both coatings was approximately 3 µm. AlCrN lost 30 and 10 times less volume than TiAlN in pin-on-disk tests, under low and high loads, respectively. The steady friction coefficient value was also lower. This indicated that the AlCrN coating had a better performance under sliding conditions. On the other hand, the mass loss was similar for both coatings under abrasive wear, even under severe conditions. In the scratch tests, TiAlN coating failed at 60 N load and AlCrN coating at 70 N, the latter showing a higher value of critical load. The deformation was similar for both coatings as it could be observed in the profiles obtained by a mechanical profilometer at 60 N, however, AlCrN did not show film delamination. This enhanced performance can be attributed to higher fracture toughness and load carrying capacity, which not only improved the mechanical properties of the coating but also its adhesion to the stainless-steel substrate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surface Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surface Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02670844241241120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surface Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02670844241241120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, COATINGS & FILMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
TiAlN 和 AlCrN 涂层广泛应用于需要高抗应力的应用领域。本研究对沉积在 AISI 马氏体不锈钢上的物理气相沉积 (PVD) TiAlN 和 AlCrN 商业涂层的摩擦学行为进行了研究。通过 X 射线衍射 (XRD)、光学显微镜 (OM) 和扫描电子显微镜 (SEM) 分析了涂层的微观结构,并测量了纳米硬度。进行了针盘磨损和磨料磨损试验。使用洛氏 C 压痕和划痕测试评估了附着力。两种涂层的厚度均约为 3 微米。在低负荷和高负荷的针盘测试中,AlCrN 的体积损失分别比 TiAlN 少 30 倍和 10 倍。稳定摩擦系数值也更低。这表明 AlCrN 涂层在滑动条件下具有更好的性能。另一方面,即使在恶劣条件下,两种涂层在磨料磨损下的质量损失也相似。在划痕测试中,TiAlN 涂层在 60 N 负荷下失效,AlCrN 涂层在 70 N 负荷下失效,后者显示出更高的临界负荷值。从机械轮廓仪在 60 N 负载下获得的轮廓中可以观察到,两种涂层的变形情况相似,但 AlCrN 没有出现薄膜脱层现象。性能的提高可归因于更高的断裂韧性和承载能力,这不仅改善了涂层的机械性能,还提高了其与不锈钢基材的附着力。
Tribological behaviour of TiAlN and AlCrN coatings on stainless steel
TiAlN and AlCrN coatings are widely used in applications that require high stress resistance. In this work, the tribological behaviour of physical vapour deposition (PVD) TiAlN and AlCrN commercial coatings deposited on AISI martensitic stainless steel is studied. Microstructure of the coatings was analysed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and nanohardness was measured. Pin-on-disk and abrasive wear tests were performed. Adhesion was evaluated using Rockwell C Indentation and scratch test. The thickness of both coatings was approximately 3 µm. AlCrN lost 30 and 10 times less volume than TiAlN in pin-on-disk tests, under low and high loads, respectively. The steady friction coefficient value was also lower. This indicated that the AlCrN coating had a better performance under sliding conditions. On the other hand, the mass loss was similar for both coatings under abrasive wear, even under severe conditions. In the scratch tests, TiAlN coating failed at 60 N load and AlCrN coating at 70 N, the latter showing a higher value of critical load. The deformation was similar for both coatings as it could be observed in the profiles obtained by a mechanical profilometer at 60 N, however, AlCrN did not show film delamination. This enhanced performance can be attributed to higher fracture toughness and load carrying capacity, which not only improved the mechanical properties of the coating but also its adhesion to the stainless-steel substrate.
期刊介绍:
Surface Engineering provides a forum for the publication of refereed material on both the theory and practice of this important enabling technology, embracing science, technology and engineering. Coverage includes design, surface modification technologies and process control, and the characterisation and properties of the final system or component, including quality control and non-destructive examination.