从畜牧业生产评估气候行动减缓战略的影响:综述--温室气体减排解决方案

Geberemariyam Terefe, Mulugeta Walelegne
{"title":"从畜牧业生产评估气候行动减缓战略的影响:综述--温室气体减排解决方案","authors":"Geberemariyam Terefe, Mulugeta Walelegne","doi":"10.1079/cabireviews.2024.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The main sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are enteric fermentation from ruminants and manure management. An integrated strategy-combination approach incorporating nutrition and manure management is necessary to dramatically reduce GHGs and the carbon footprint of milk production. The aim of this review was to assess the effect of climate action mitigation strategies on the GHG production of ruminant animals. This review was based on the different references, which are textbooks, journals, proceedings, conferences, and abstracts accessed through Agricola, Agris, CAB Abstracts, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Web of Science. The research findings were done by using dairy cattle, sheep, and goat; the numbers of animals used in each experiment were given the majority of attention, and decisions were also made based on the method used to quantify methane (CH\n 4\n ) and nitrous oxide. Enteric CH\n 4\n per unit of milk was reduced by 6–8% when higher-starch corn silage was used in place of barley or alfalfa silage. Cows fed seaweed (1.77–2%, on dry matter [DM] basis) experienced a linear drop in enteric CH\n 4\n emission from 383 to 400 g/d. Supplementation of vegetable fats (6%) and coconut oil (12 g/day) to ruminant diets can decrease CH\n 4\n emissions by 21–40% and 50–61.2%, respectively. Similarly, the addition of 21.5 g nitrate/kg DM reduces CH\n 4\n yield (17%) in sheep. Bovaer can reduce methane emissions (30%) for dairy cows. Feed processing and additives are alternative strategies to minimize GHG production in ruminants, but further studies on additives and their residual effect on livestock output is needed.\n","PeriodicalId":503542,"journal":{"name":"CABI Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of climate action mitigation strategies from livestock production: A review – Solution for greenhouse gases mitigation\",\"authors\":\"Geberemariyam Terefe, Mulugeta Walelegne\",\"doi\":\"10.1079/cabireviews.2024.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n The main sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are enteric fermentation from ruminants and manure management. An integrated strategy-combination approach incorporating nutrition and manure management is necessary to dramatically reduce GHGs and the carbon footprint of milk production. The aim of this review was to assess the effect of climate action mitigation strategies on the GHG production of ruminant animals. This review was based on the different references, which are textbooks, journals, proceedings, conferences, and abstracts accessed through Agricola, Agris, CAB Abstracts, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Web of Science. The research findings were done by using dairy cattle, sheep, and goat; the numbers of animals used in each experiment were given the majority of attention, and decisions were also made based on the method used to quantify methane (CH\\n 4\\n ) and nitrous oxide. Enteric CH\\n 4\\n per unit of milk was reduced by 6–8% when higher-starch corn silage was used in place of barley or alfalfa silage. Cows fed seaweed (1.77–2%, on dry matter [DM] basis) experienced a linear drop in enteric CH\\n 4\\n emission from 383 to 400 g/d. Supplementation of vegetable fats (6%) and coconut oil (12 g/day) to ruminant diets can decrease CH\\n 4\\n emissions by 21–40% and 50–61.2%, respectively. Similarly, the addition of 21.5 g nitrate/kg DM reduces CH\\n 4\\n yield (17%) in sheep. Bovaer can reduce methane emissions (30%) for dairy cows. Feed processing and additives are alternative strategies to minimize GHG production in ruminants, but further studies on additives and their residual effect on livestock output is needed.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CABI Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CABI Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2024.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CABI Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/cabireviews.2024.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

温室气体 (GHG) 排放的主要来源是反刍动物的肠道发酵和粪便管理。要大幅减少温室气体和牛奶生产中的碳足迹,就必须采用一种包含营养和粪便管理的综合战略组合方法。本综述旨在评估气候行动减缓战略对反刍动物温室气体产生的影响。本综述基于不同的参考文献,包括教科书、期刊、论文集、会议以及通过 Agricola、Agris、CAB Abstracts、Embase、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science 查阅的摘要。研究结果是通过使用奶牛、绵羊和山羊得出的;每个实验中使用的动物数量受到了极大关注,同时还根据甲烷(CH 4 )和氧化亚氮的量化方法做出了决定。如果用淀粉含量较高的玉米青贮代替大麦或苜蓿青贮,每单位牛奶中的肠道 CH 4 可减少 6-8%。饲喂海藻(1.77%-2%,以干物质 [DM] 为基础)的奶牛的肠道 CH 4 排放量从 383 克/天直线下降到 400 克/天。在反刍动物日粮中添加植物脂肪(6%)和椰子油(12 克/天)可使 CH 4 排放量分别减少 21-40% 和 50-61.2%。同样,添加 21.5 克硝酸盐/千克 DM 可减少绵羊的 CH 4 产量(17%)。Bovaer 可以减少奶牛的甲烷排放量(30%)。饲料加工和添加剂是最大限度减少反刍动物温室气体产生的替代策略,但还需要进一步研究添加剂及其对牲畜产出的剩余影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the impact of climate action mitigation strategies from livestock production: A review – Solution for greenhouse gases mitigation
The main sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are enteric fermentation from ruminants and manure management. An integrated strategy-combination approach incorporating nutrition and manure management is necessary to dramatically reduce GHGs and the carbon footprint of milk production. The aim of this review was to assess the effect of climate action mitigation strategies on the GHG production of ruminant animals. This review was based on the different references, which are textbooks, journals, proceedings, conferences, and abstracts accessed through Agricola, Agris, CAB Abstracts, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Web of Science. The research findings were done by using dairy cattle, sheep, and goat; the numbers of animals used in each experiment were given the majority of attention, and decisions were also made based on the method used to quantify methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide. Enteric CH 4 per unit of milk was reduced by 6–8% when higher-starch corn silage was used in place of barley or alfalfa silage. Cows fed seaweed (1.77–2%, on dry matter [DM] basis) experienced a linear drop in enteric CH 4 emission from 383 to 400 g/d. Supplementation of vegetable fats (6%) and coconut oil (12 g/day) to ruminant diets can decrease CH 4 emissions by 21–40% and 50–61.2%, respectively. Similarly, the addition of 21.5 g nitrate/kg DM reduces CH 4 yield (17%) in sheep. Bovaer can reduce methane emissions (30%) for dairy cows. Feed processing and additives are alternative strategies to minimize GHG production in ruminants, but further studies on additives and their residual effect on livestock output is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The mechanisms of melatonin action in shielding photosynthesis during heat stress Revitalizing agricultural price mechanisms: A review and call for enhancement Assessing the impact of climate action mitigation strategies from livestock production: A review – Solution for greenhouse gases mitigation Role of genetically modified organisms in food, crop production, their regulations, and controversy Multiple approaches in the study of ancient human microbiome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1