医疗保健伦理咨询方法数字工具箱

J. Crikemans, J. Libbrecht, I. Beckers, G. Froyen
{"title":"医疗保健伦理咨询方法数字工具箱","authors":"J. Crikemans, J. Libbrecht, I. Beckers, G. Froyen","doi":"10.47671/tvg.80.24.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital toolbox with methods of ethical case deliberation in care\n\n \n\nThis era is characterized by pluralism of values. Therefore, caregivers cannot find the answer to the question “How do I have to act to be a good caregiver?” any longer in old certainties, but in dialogue between everybody involved in a given care situation. It is necessary to hold this dialogue systematically. Especially in complex situations, moral case deliberation is, therefore, the most proper method. The essential point in each ethical deliberation is posing the accurate moral question, which doesn’t probe only into theoretical or practical knowhow, but interrogates what the persons involved in the given situation are permitted to do, must do or have to refrain from. There are a lot of different methods of ethical deliberation, but in principle, they all have the same basic structure consisting of 7 parts. Moral deliberation must always start from the facts that occur in a specific situation, but one must look beyond the bare facts. Humans essentially give meaning to the facts that happen in their lives. Ethical deliberation should especially give attention to this sense-making. In practice, moral deliberation is not always practicable due to the lack of time. Therefore, more compact methods of ethical deliberation were developed. In order to place all these methods at everyone’s disposal, 2 websites with a digital toolbox were created: one in Dutch and one in French.","PeriodicalId":507632,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitale werktuigkist met ethische overlegmethoden in de zorg\",\"authors\":\"J. Crikemans, J. Libbrecht, I. Beckers, G. Froyen\",\"doi\":\"10.47671/tvg.80.24.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital toolbox with methods of ethical case deliberation in care\\n\\n \\n\\nThis era is characterized by pluralism of values. Therefore, caregivers cannot find the answer to the question “How do I have to act to be a good caregiver?” any longer in old certainties, but in dialogue between everybody involved in a given care situation. It is necessary to hold this dialogue systematically. Especially in complex situations, moral case deliberation is, therefore, the most proper method. The essential point in each ethical deliberation is posing the accurate moral question, which doesn’t probe only into theoretical or practical knowhow, but interrogates what the persons involved in the given situation are permitted to do, must do or have to refrain from. There are a lot of different methods of ethical deliberation, but in principle, they all have the same basic structure consisting of 7 parts. Moral deliberation must always start from the facts that occur in a specific situation, but one must look beyond the bare facts. Humans essentially give meaning to the facts that happen in their lives. Ethical deliberation should especially give attention to this sense-making. In practice, moral deliberation is not always practicable due to the lack of time. Therefore, more compact methods of ethical deliberation were developed. In order to place all these methods at everyone’s disposal, 2 websites with a digital toolbox were created: one in Dutch and one in French.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.80.24.016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47671/tvg.80.24.016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字工具箱中的护理伦理案例讨论方法 这个时代的特点是价值观多元化。因此,对于 "我应该如何做才能成为一名优秀的护理人员?"这个问题,护理人员不能再从过去的固有观念中找到答案,而应该在特定护理环境中的每个人之间开展对话。有必要系统地进行这种对话。因此,特别是在复杂的情况下,道德案例讨论是最合适的方法。每次道德评议的要点都是提出准确的道德问题,而不是仅仅探究理论或实践知识,而是询问特定情况下的相关人员可以做什么、必须做什么或必须避免做什么。道德评议的方法多种多样,但原则上都有相同的基本结构,由七个部分组成。道德思考必须始终从特定情况下发生的事实出发,但人们的目光必须超越赤裸裸的事实。人类从根本上赋予生活中发生的事实以意义。道德考量尤其应关注这种意义生成。在实践中,由于缺乏时间,道德审议并不总是切实可行的。因此,人们开发出了更加紧凑的道德审议方法。为了让每个人都能使用所有这些方法,我们创建了两个带有数字工具箱的网站:一个荷兰语网站和一个法语网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digitale werktuigkist met ethische overlegmethoden in de zorg
Digital toolbox with methods of ethical case deliberation in care This era is characterized by pluralism of values. Therefore, caregivers cannot find the answer to the question “How do I have to act to be a good caregiver?” any longer in old certainties, but in dialogue between everybody involved in a given care situation. It is necessary to hold this dialogue systematically. Especially in complex situations, moral case deliberation is, therefore, the most proper method. The essential point in each ethical deliberation is posing the accurate moral question, which doesn’t probe only into theoretical or practical knowhow, but interrogates what the persons involved in the given situation are permitted to do, must do or have to refrain from. There are a lot of different methods of ethical deliberation, but in principle, they all have the same basic structure consisting of 7 parts. Moral deliberation must always start from the facts that occur in a specific situation, but one must look beyond the bare facts. Humans essentially give meaning to the facts that happen in their lives. Ethical deliberation should especially give attention to this sense-making. In practice, moral deliberation is not always practicable due to the lack of time. Therefore, more compact methods of ethical deliberation were developed. In order to place all these methods at everyone’s disposal, 2 websites with a digital toolbox were created: one in Dutch and one in French.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cerebrale ischemie als oorzaak van verminderd bewustzijn: het Percheron-infarct E-book: Antibiotica(resistentie) – Uitgave 2024 QTc-verlenging door antipsychoticagebruik binnen de kinder- en jeugdpsychiatrie: een systematische literatuurstudie Transmediastinale migratie van een Kirschner-pin na fixatie van een proximale humerusfractuur: een casus MCT bij ouderen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1