Julia Katharina Vogt, Wolfgang Kurt Vogt, Alexander Heinzel, F. Mottaghy
{"title":"基于通气灌注比的 PE 诊断计算决策支持。","authors":"Julia Katharina Vogt, Wolfgang Kurt Vogt, Alexander Heinzel, F. Mottaghy","doi":"10.1055/a-2287-2051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\nThe aim of this study is to investigate whether computer-aided, semi-automated 3D lung lobe quantification can support decision-making on PE diagnosis based on the ventilation-perfusion ratio in clinical practice.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA study cohort of 100 patients (39 male, 61 female, age 64.8±15.8 years) underwent ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT/CT) to exclude acute PE on SPECT/CT OPTIMA NM/CT 640 (GE Healthcare). Two 3D lung lobe quantification software tools (Q. Lung: Xeleris 4.0, GE Healthcare and LLQ: Hermes Hybrid 3D Lung Lobar Quantification, Hermes Medical Solutions) were used to evaluate the numerical lobar ventilation/perfusion ratio (VQR) and lobar volume/perfusion ratio (VPR). A test of linearity and equivalence of the two 3D software tools was performed using Pearson, Spearman, quadratic weighted kappa and the mean squared deviation for VPR/VQR. An algorithm was developed that identified PE candidates using ROC analysis. The agreement between the PE findings of an experienced nuclear medicine expert and the calculated PE candidates was represented by the magnitude of the YOUDEN index (J) and the size of the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).\n\n\nRESULTS\nBoth 3D software tools showed good comparability. The YOUDEN index for QLUNG(VPR/VQR)/LLQ(VPR/VQR) was in the range from 0.2 to 0.5. The mean AUC averaged over all lung lobes for QLUNG(VPR) was 0.66, CI95%: ±14.0%, for QLUNG(VQR) 0.66, CI95%: ±13.3%, for LLQ(VPR) 0.64, CI95%: ±14.7% and for LLQ(VQR) 0.65, CI95%: ±13.1%.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis study reveals that 3D software tools are feasible for numerical PE detection. The clinical decision can be supported by using a numerical algorithm based on ROC analysis.","PeriodicalId":94161,"journal":{"name":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational Decision Support for PE Diagnosis based on Ventilation Perfusion Ratio.\",\"authors\":\"Julia Katharina Vogt, Wolfgang Kurt Vogt, Alexander Heinzel, F. Mottaghy\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2287-2051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIM\\nThe aim of this study is to investigate whether computer-aided, semi-automated 3D lung lobe quantification can support decision-making on PE diagnosis based on the ventilation-perfusion ratio in clinical practice.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA study cohort of 100 patients (39 male, 61 female, age 64.8±15.8 years) underwent ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT/CT) to exclude acute PE on SPECT/CT OPTIMA NM/CT 640 (GE Healthcare). Two 3D lung lobe quantification software tools (Q. Lung: Xeleris 4.0, GE Healthcare and LLQ: Hermes Hybrid 3D Lung Lobar Quantification, Hermes Medical Solutions) were used to evaluate the numerical lobar ventilation/perfusion ratio (VQR) and lobar volume/perfusion ratio (VPR). A test of linearity and equivalence of the two 3D software tools was performed using Pearson, Spearman, quadratic weighted kappa and the mean squared deviation for VPR/VQR. An algorithm was developed that identified PE candidates using ROC analysis. The agreement between the PE findings of an experienced nuclear medicine expert and the calculated PE candidates was represented by the magnitude of the YOUDEN index (J) and the size of the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nBoth 3D software tools showed good comparability. The YOUDEN index for QLUNG(VPR/VQR)/LLQ(VPR/VQR) was in the range from 0.2 to 0.5. The mean AUC averaged over all lung lobes for QLUNG(VPR) was 0.66, CI95%: ±14.0%, for QLUNG(VQR) 0.66, CI95%: ±13.3%, for LLQ(VPR) 0.64, CI95%: ±14.7% and for LLQ(VQR) 0.65, CI95%: ±13.1%.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThis study reveals that 3D software tools are feasible for numerical PE detection. The clinical decision can be supported by using a numerical algorithm based on ROC analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2287-2051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2287-2051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
方法研究队列中的 100 名患者(39 名男性,61 名女性,年龄为 64.8±15.8 岁)接受了通气/灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(V/Q-SPECT/CT),以排除 SPECT/CT OPTIMA NM/CT 640(通用电气医疗集团)的急性 PE。两个三维肺叶量化软件工具(Q. Lung:Xeleris 4.0,GE Healthcare)和LLQ:Hermes Hybrid 3D Lung Lobar Quantification,Hermes Medical Solutions)用于评估数值肺叶通气/灌注比(VQR)和肺叶容积/灌注比(VPR)。使用皮尔逊、斯皮尔曼、二次加权卡帕和 VPR/VQR 的均方差对两种 3D 软件工具的线性和等效性进行了测试。还开发了一种算法,利用 ROC 分析确定 PE 候选者。经验丰富的核医学专家得出的 PE 结果与计算出的 PE 候选结果之间的一致性用尤登指数(J)的大小和接收者操作曲线下面积(AUC)的大小来表示。QLUNG(VPR/VQR)/LLQ(VPR/VQR)的尤登指数在 0.2 至 0.5 之间。QLUNG(VPR)的所有肺叶平均AUC为0.66,CI95%:±14.0%;QLUNG(VQR)为0.66,CI95%:±13.3%;LLQ(VPR)为0.64,CI95%:±14.7%;LLQ(VQR)为0.65,CI95%:±13.1%。通过使用基于 ROC 分析的数值算法,可为临床决策提供支持。
Computational Decision Support for PE Diagnosis based on Ventilation Perfusion Ratio.
AIM
The aim of this study is to investigate whether computer-aided, semi-automated 3D lung lobe quantification can support decision-making on PE diagnosis based on the ventilation-perfusion ratio in clinical practice.
METHODS
A study cohort of 100 patients (39 male, 61 female, age 64.8±15.8 years) underwent ventilation/perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (V/Q-SPECT/CT) to exclude acute PE on SPECT/CT OPTIMA NM/CT 640 (GE Healthcare). Two 3D lung lobe quantification software tools (Q. Lung: Xeleris 4.0, GE Healthcare and LLQ: Hermes Hybrid 3D Lung Lobar Quantification, Hermes Medical Solutions) were used to evaluate the numerical lobar ventilation/perfusion ratio (VQR) and lobar volume/perfusion ratio (VPR). A test of linearity and equivalence of the two 3D software tools was performed using Pearson, Spearman, quadratic weighted kappa and the mean squared deviation for VPR/VQR. An algorithm was developed that identified PE candidates using ROC analysis. The agreement between the PE findings of an experienced nuclear medicine expert and the calculated PE candidates was represented by the magnitude of the YOUDEN index (J) and the size of the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC).
RESULTS
Both 3D software tools showed good comparability. The YOUDEN index for QLUNG(VPR/VQR)/LLQ(VPR/VQR) was in the range from 0.2 to 0.5. The mean AUC averaged over all lung lobes for QLUNG(VPR) was 0.66, CI95%: ±14.0%, for QLUNG(VQR) 0.66, CI95%: ±13.3%, for LLQ(VPR) 0.64, CI95%: ±14.7% and for LLQ(VQR) 0.65, CI95%: ±13.1%.
CONCLUSION
This study reveals that 3D software tools are feasible for numerical PE detection. The clinical decision can be supported by using a numerical algorithm based on ROC analysis.