神圣的记忆":托马斯-哈代的墓碑

Eva Dema
{"title":"神圣的记忆\":托马斯-哈代的墓碑","authors":"Eva Dema","doi":"10.1093/res/hgae028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Thomas Hardy often composed with two distinct media in mind: print and inscription. Designing epitaphs for the tombstones of family members before turning to verse to reflect upon this largely frustrating inscriptive work, Hardy expressed a particular interest in the divergent capacities for alteration afforded by paper and stone. Reading Hardy’s monumental inscriptions alongside the poems they inspired, this article assesses the extent to which Hardy’s simultaneous engagement with manuscripts and tombstones—two surfaces that presented drastically different capacities for amendment—shaped his understanding of the function and potential of revision. Turning first to Hardy’s lifelong interest in stonework, this article considers the poet’s personal experience with letter-cutting and epitaphic design, before offering a close textual reading of the poetry this activity inspired. Considering three key verses penned in reflection upon the poet’s lapidary endeavours, I examine the compositional tension between media that emerges through revision, and the problem this poses for Hardy’s curious tendency to conflate the act of writing with the act of carving.","PeriodicalId":255318,"journal":{"name":"The Review of English Studies","volume":"14 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Sacred to the Memory’: Thomas Hardy’s Tombstones\",\"authors\":\"Eva Dema\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/res/hgae028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Thomas Hardy often composed with two distinct media in mind: print and inscription. Designing epitaphs for the tombstones of family members before turning to verse to reflect upon this largely frustrating inscriptive work, Hardy expressed a particular interest in the divergent capacities for alteration afforded by paper and stone. Reading Hardy’s monumental inscriptions alongside the poems they inspired, this article assesses the extent to which Hardy’s simultaneous engagement with manuscripts and tombstones—two surfaces that presented drastically different capacities for amendment—shaped his understanding of the function and potential of revision. Turning first to Hardy’s lifelong interest in stonework, this article considers the poet’s personal experience with letter-cutting and epitaphic design, before offering a close textual reading of the poetry this activity inspired. Considering three key verses penned in reflection upon the poet’s lapidary endeavours, I examine the compositional tension between media that emerges through revision, and the problem this poses for Hardy’s curious tendency to conflate the act of writing with the act of carving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Review of English Studies\",\"volume\":\"14 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Review of English Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgae028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Review of English Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/res/hgae028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

托马斯-哈代在创作时经常考虑到两种不同的媒介:印刷品和碑文。哈代曾为家族成员的墓碑设计墓志铭,之后又转向诗歌创作,对这一在很大程度上令人沮丧的碑铭作品进行反思,他对纸张和石头所提供的不同修改能力表现出了特别的兴趣。在阅读哈代的纪念碑碑文及其激发的诗歌时,本文评估了哈代同时接触手稿和墓碑的程度--这两种表面呈现出截然不同的修改能力,塑造了他对修改的功能和潜力的理解。本文首先从哈代毕生对石雕的兴趣入手,探讨了诗人在字母切割和墓志铭设计方面的个人经历,然后对这一活动所激发的诗歌进行了细致的文本解读。考虑到诗人在反思自己的石工工作时写下的三首关键诗句,我研究了通过修改而产生的媒介之间的构成张力,以及这对哈代将写作行为与雕刻行为混为一谈的奇怪倾向所带来的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘Sacred to the Memory’: Thomas Hardy’s Tombstones
Thomas Hardy often composed with two distinct media in mind: print and inscription. Designing epitaphs for the tombstones of family members before turning to verse to reflect upon this largely frustrating inscriptive work, Hardy expressed a particular interest in the divergent capacities for alteration afforded by paper and stone. Reading Hardy’s monumental inscriptions alongside the poems they inspired, this article assesses the extent to which Hardy’s simultaneous engagement with manuscripts and tombstones—two surfaces that presented drastically different capacities for amendment—shaped his understanding of the function and potential of revision. Turning first to Hardy’s lifelong interest in stonework, this article considers the poet’s personal experience with letter-cutting and epitaphic design, before offering a close textual reading of the poetry this activity inspired. Considering three key verses penned in reflection upon the poet’s lapidary endeavours, I examine the compositional tension between media that emerges through revision, and the problem this poses for Hardy’s curious tendency to conflate the act of writing with the act of carving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nicholas Seager (ed.). The Cambridge Edition of the Correspondence of Daniel Defoe Nils-Lennart Johannesson and Andrew Cooper (eds). Ormulum, edited from Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Junius 1 and London, Lambeth Palace Library, MS 783 ‘Sacred to the Memory’: Thomas Hardy’s Tombstones Keats’s Unwritten Epic Boundaries and Disgust in The Duchess of Malfi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1