反周期资本缓冲对信贷的影响:从其在 COVID-19 之前和期间的积累和释放中获得的证据

Mikel Bedayo, Jorge E. Galán
{"title":"反周期资本缓冲对信贷的影响:从其在 COVID-19 之前和期间的积累和释放中获得的证据","authors":"Mikel Bedayo, Jorge E. Galán","doi":"10.53479/36312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) has become a very important macroprudential tool to strengthen banks’ resilience. However, there is still limited evidence of its impact on lending over the cycle. Using data of 170 banks in 25 European Union countries, we provide a comprehensive assessment of how the CCyB release during the pandemic and its earlier accumulation impacted lending activity. We find that the CCyB has significant effects on lending, but that these effects are highly dependent on banks’ capitalization levels and, more importantly, on their headroom over regulatory requirements. We show that the release of the CCyB in response to the pandemic had a positive impact on lending, especially for banks with the lowest headroom over requirements, and that this effect was larger than the negative impact of its previous accumulation. While the CCyB accumulation had a short-term negative impact on lending for the most capital-constrained banks, this effect quickly diluted due to their enhanced solvency position, potentially allowing them to lower their cost of equity. Our results provide evidence of the benefits of the CCyB, especially in supporting lending during adverse events, while emphasising the need for policymakers to consider the heterogeneous effects across banks when deploying this tool.","PeriodicalId":296461,"journal":{"name":"Documentos de Trabajo","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of the Countercyclical Capital Buffer on credit: Evidence from its accumulation and release before and during COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Mikel Bedayo, Jorge E. Galán\",\"doi\":\"10.53479/36312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) has become a very important macroprudential tool to strengthen banks’ resilience. However, there is still limited evidence of its impact on lending over the cycle. Using data of 170 banks in 25 European Union countries, we provide a comprehensive assessment of how the CCyB release during the pandemic and its earlier accumulation impacted lending activity. We find that the CCyB has significant effects on lending, but that these effects are highly dependent on banks’ capitalization levels and, more importantly, on their headroom over regulatory requirements. We show that the release of the CCyB in response to the pandemic had a positive impact on lending, especially for banks with the lowest headroom over requirements, and that this effect was larger than the negative impact of its previous accumulation. While the CCyB accumulation had a short-term negative impact on lending for the most capital-constrained banks, this effect quickly diluted due to their enhanced solvency position, potentially allowing them to lower their cost of equity. Our results provide evidence of the benefits of the CCyB, especially in supporting lending during adverse events, while emphasising the need for policymakers to consider the heterogeneous effects across banks when deploying this tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Documentos de Trabajo\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Documentos de Trabajo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53479/36312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documentos de Trabajo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53479/36312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反周期资本缓冲(CCyB)已成为加强银行抗风险能力的一个非常重要的宏观审慎工具。然而,有关其对周期内贷款的影响的证据仍然有限。我们利用 25 个欧盟国家 170 家银行的数据,全面评估了大流行病期间释放的 CCyB 及其早期积累对贷款活动的影响。我们发现,中央合作银行对贷款有显著影响,但这些影响在很大程度上取决于银行的资本化水平,更重要的是,取决于银行超出监管要求的余地。我们的研究表明,为应对大流行病而释放中央合作银行对贷款产生了积极影响,尤其是对超出监管要求的净空最低的银行而言,而且这种影响大于之前积累中央合作银行所产生的负面影响。虽然对于资本最紧张的银行来说,积累信用证对贷款产生了短期的负面影响,但由于其偿付能力增强,这种影响很快就被淡化了,这有可能使它们降低股本成本。我们的研究结果证明了中央合作银行的益处,尤其是在不利事件发生时支持贷款的益处,同时也强调了政策制定者在使用这一工具时需要考虑对不同银行的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of the Countercyclical Capital Buffer on credit: Evidence from its accumulation and release before and during COVID-19
The countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) has become a very important macroprudential tool to strengthen banks’ resilience. However, there is still limited evidence of its impact on lending over the cycle. Using data of 170 banks in 25 European Union countries, we provide a comprehensive assessment of how the CCyB release during the pandemic and its earlier accumulation impacted lending activity. We find that the CCyB has significant effects on lending, but that these effects are highly dependent on banks’ capitalization levels and, more importantly, on their headroom over regulatory requirements. We show that the release of the CCyB in response to the pandemic had a positive impact on lending, especially for banks with the lowest headroom over requirements, and that this effect was larger than the negative impact of its previous accumulation. While the CCyB accumulation had a short-term negative impact on lending for the most capital-constrained banks, this effect quickly diluted due to their enhanced solvency position, potentially allowing them to lower their cost of equity. Our results provide evidence of the benefits of the CCyB, especially in supporting lending during adverse events, while emphasising the need for policymakers to consider the heterogeneous effects across banks when deploying this tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Green energy transition and vulnerability to external shocks Access to credit and firm survival during a crisis: the case of zero-bank-debt firms Shadow seniority? Lending relationships and borrowers’ selective default Stabilisation properties of a sure-like European unemployment insurance The effects of the ECB’s unconventional monetary policies from 2011 to 2018 on banking assets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1