使用两种评估方法评估急救人员和临床人员放置心电图胸电极的准确性

Edwin Clopton, Eira Kristiina Hyrkäs
{"title":"使用两种评估方法评估急救人员和临床人员放置心电图胸电极的准确性","authors":"Edwin Clopton, Eira Kristiina Hyrkäs","doi":"10.56068/jgdq2473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and purpose:  A valid 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) depends on correct acquisition technique, particularly on the accurate location of precordial (chest) electrodes.  The emergency medical services (EMS) segment of the care continuum is under-represented in previous clinically oriented studies of electrode placement.  This study sought to assess the accuracy of chest electrode placement by EMS and clinical personnel in one geographic area, to identify patterns of misplacement to inform future training and continuing education, and to compare two methods of assessing electrode placement. \nMethods:  This prospective observational study recruited a convenience sample of EMS and clinical personnel.  Participants placed simulated electrodes on a CPR-style manikin and completed a questionnaire about their training and experience.  A subset also marked electrode locations on a printed diagram of the ribcage.  Digitized placement data and questionnaire responses were analysed statistically.\nResults:  Findings from 149 participants showed misplacement patterns consistent with prior studies, with 41.6% rated as “acceptable” and 34.2% placing £ 3 electrodes acceptably.  Correctness of electrode placement was comparable between EMS and clinical participants. More correct electrode placement correlated with classroom vs. on-the-job training, frequent vs. infrequent practice, and greater self-confidence. The diagram data collection method proved not equivalent to, and probably less reliable than, the hands-on manikin method for assessing placement skills.\nConclusions:  Significant variation in ECG chest electrode placement by EMS personnel was comparable to that previously reported for clinical personnel, suggesting that existing concerns about placement errors by clinical personnel may apply equally to EMS personnel.  More frequent practice and classroom-based initial ECG training were associated with significantly greater placement accuracy.  Participants used diverse strategies to identify electrode locations.  Further research is warranted to clarify optimal strategies for placing chest electrodes, especially on diverse body types.  Sound initial ECG training and continuing education are necessary to reinforce high-quality ECG skills.","PeriodicalId":73465,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paramedicine","volume":"194 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Accuracy of ECG Chest Electrode Placement by EMS and Clinical Personnel Using Two Evaluation Methods\",\"authors\":\"Edwin Clopton, Eira Kristiina Hyrkäs\",\"doi\":\"10.56068/jgdq2473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and purpose:  A valid 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) depends on correct acquisition technique, particularly on the accurate location of precordial (chest) electrodes.  The emergency medical services (EMS) segment of the care continuum is under-represented in previous clinically oriented studies of electrode placement.  This study sought to assess the accuracy of chest electrode placement by EMS and clinical personnel in one geographic area, to identify patterns of misplacement to inform future training and continuing education, and to compare two methods of assessing electrode placement. \\nMethods:  This prospective observational study recruited a convenience sample of EMS and clinical personnel.  Participants placed simulated electrodes on a CPR-style manikin and completed a questionnaire about their training and experience.  A subset also marked electrode locations on a printed diagram of the ribcage.  Digitized placement data and questionnaire responses were analysed statistically.\\nResults:  Findings from 149 participants showed misplacement patterns consistent with prior studies, with 41.6% rated as “acceptable” and 34.2% placing £ 3 electrodes acceptably.  Correctness of electrode placement was comparable between EMS and clinical participants. More correct electrode placement correlated with classroom vs. on-the-job training, frequent vs. infrequent practice, and greater self-confidence. The diagram data collection method proved not equivalent to, and probably less reliable than, the hands-on manikin method for assessing placement skills.\\nConclusions:  Significant variation in ECG chest electrode placement by EMS personnel was comparable to that previously reported for clinical personnel, suggesting that existing concerns about placement errors by clinical personnel may apply equally to EMS personnel.  More frequent practice and classroom-based initial ECG training were associated with significantly greater placement accuracy.  Participants used diverse strategies to identify electrode locations.  Further research is warranted to clarify optimal strategies for placing chest electrodes, especially on diverse body types.  Sound initial ECG training and continuing education are necessary to reinforce high-quality ECG skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56068/jgdq2473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56068/jgdq2473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:有效的 12 导联心电图(ECG)取决于正确的采集技术,尤其是心前区(胸部)电极的准确位置。 在以往以临床为导向的电极位置研究中,急诊医疗服务(EMS)环节的代表性不足。 本研究旨在评估一个地理区域内急救医疗服务人员和临床人员胸部电极放置的准确性,找出错误放置的模式,为今后的培训和继续教育提供参考,并比较评估电极放置的两种方法。方法: 这项前瞻性观察研究招募了急救和临床人员作为样本。 参与者在心肺复苏式人体模型上放置模拟电极,并填写一份有关其培训和经验的问卷。 其中一部分人还在打印的肋骨图上标记了电极位置。 对数字化的电极放置数据和问卷回答进行了统计分析: 结果:149 名参与者的调查结果显示,电极放置错误的模式与之前的研究一致,41.6% 的参与者被评为 "可接受",34.2% 的参与者可接受 3 英镑电极的放置。 EMS 和临床参与者的电极放置正确率相当。电极放置更正确与课堂培训和在职培训、经常练习和不经常练习以及更强的自信心有关。事实证明,图表数据收集法并不等同于人体模型实践法,而且可能不如人体模型实践法更可靠: 结论:急救人员在心电图胸电极置放方面的显著差异与之前报道的临床人员的差异相当,这表明目前对临床人员置放错误的担忧可能同样适用于急救人员。 更频繁的练习和基于课堂的初始心电图培训与更高的置放准确性有关。 参与者使用不同的策略来确定电极位置。 有必要开展进一步研究,以明确放置胸部电极的最佳策略,尤其是在不同体型的人身上。 完善的初始心电图培训和继续教育对于强化高质量的心电图技能十分必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the Accuracy of ECG Chest Electrode Placement by EMS and Clinical Personnel Using Two Evaluation Methods
Background and purpose:  A valid 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) depends on correct acquisition technique, particularly on the accurate location of precordial (chest) electrodes.  The emergency medical services (EMS) segment of the care continuum is under-represented in previous clinically oriented studies of electrode placement.  This study sought to assess the accuracy of chest electrode placement by EMS and clinical personnel in one geographic area, to identify patterns of misplacement to inform future training and continuing education, and to compare two methods of assessing electrode placement.  Methods:  This prospective observational study recruited a convenience sample of EMS and clinical personnel.  Participants placed simulated electrodes on a CPR-style manikin and completed a questionnaire about their training and experience.  A subset also marked electrode locations on a printed diagram of the ribcage.  Digitized placement data and questionnaire responses were analysed statistically. Results:  Findings from 149 participants showed misplacement patterns consistent with prior studies, with 41.6% rated as “acceptable” and 34.2% placing £ 3 electrodes acceptably.  Correctness of electrode placement was comparable between EMS and clinical participants. More correct electrode placement correlated with classroom vs. on-the-job training, frequent vs. infrequent practice, and greater self-confidence. The diagram data collection method proved not equivalent to, and probably less reliable than, the hands-on manikin method for assessing placement skills. Conclusions:  Significant variation in ECG chest electrode placement by EMS personnel was comparable to that previously reported for clinical personnel, suggesting that existing concerns about placement errors by clinical personnel may apply equally to EMS personnel.  More frequent practice and classroom-based initial ECG training were associated with significantly greater placement accuracy.  Participants used diverse strategies to identify electrode locations.  Further research is warranted to clarify optimal strategies for placing chest electrodes, especially on diverse body types.  Sound initial ECG training and continuing education are necessary to reinforce high-quality ECG skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Threat or Challenge Response of Undergraduate Paramedicine Students During High-Stress Clinical Scenarios The State of Emergency Medical Services Clinician Mental Health in Virginia Demonstration of Doppler Ultrasound Pulse Detection by Trained Prehospital Personnel Influence of Rurality When Accessing Emergency Healthcare During Exacerbation of Asthma Paramedicine Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1