采用分组随机阶梯式设计,评估在埃塞俄比亚卫生站开展集体产前护理的可行性、可接受性及其对继续接受产前护理和在医疗机构分娩的影响:研究方案

W. W. Yallew, Rediet Fasil, Della Berhanu, Konjit Wolde, Dedefo Teshite, Reena Sethi, G. Yenokyan, Y. Woldemariam, S. Suhowatsky, A. Hyre, Lisa M. Noguchi, Alemayehu Worku
{"title":"采用分组随机阶梯式设计,评估在埃塞俄比亚卫生站开展集体产前护理的可行性、可接受性及其对继续接受产前护理和在医疗机构分娩的影响:研究方案","authors":"W. W. Yallew, Rediet Fasil, Della Berhanu, Konjit Wolde, Dedefo Teshite, Reena Sethi, G. Yenokyan, Y. Woldemariam, S. Suhowatsky, A. Hyre, Lisa M. Noguchi, Alemayehu Worku","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.15190.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Adequate antenatal care (ANC) and facility-based delivery are linked to improved maternal and neonatal outcomes. Adequate antenatal care attendance and facility birth rates are increasing in Ethiopia but remain well below national goals and global recommendations. Group ANC (G-ANC), when implemented at higher level facilities, is associated with improved quality and experience of ANC, and increased ANC retention and facility-based delivery. The objectives of the study are to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of G-ANC implemented at lower-level facilities (health posts) on ANC continuation and facility-based delivery. Methods G-ANC will first be piloted in five purposively selected health posts. The study will then use a stepped-wedge design in 36 health posts under six health centers, with randomization of the order of the start of the intervention done at the health center level (clusters). The design will include three time periods: first is a six-month control period with no G-ANC implementation, followed by another six months period where G-ANC will be introduced in half (n=18) of the study health posts, then final six months where G-ANC will be implemented in the remaining 18 health posts. Quantitative and qualitative data collection approaches will be used. The study has “pause and reflect” points designed to iterate on the intervention before rolling out to the next set of sites. Qualitative research will be conducted using in-depth interviews with pregnant women, health care workers, facility managers, and regional health managers. 770 women will be enrolled across all phases. Conclusions The study will inform decision makers locally and globally on whether G-ANC is a feasible service delivery model at the health post level. Effectiveness of G-ANC at increasing ANC retention and facility-based delivery will be reported, as well as its acceptability to pregnant women and Health Extension Workers. Registration NCT05054491, ClinicalTrials.gov (September 23rd 2021).","PeriodicalId":504483,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"152 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of Group Antenatal Care at the health post level on continuation in antenatal care and facility based delivery in Ethiopia using a cluster randomized stepped-wedge design: Study protocol\",\"authors\":\"W. W. Yallew, Rediet Fasil, Della Berhanu, Konjit Wolde, Dedefo Teshite, Reena Sethi, G. Yenokyan, Y. Woldemariam, S. Suhowatsky, A. Hyre, Lisa M. Noguchi, Alemayehu Worku\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/gatesopenres.15190.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Adequate antenatal care (ANC) and facility-based delivery are linked to improved maternal and neonatal outcomes. Adequate antenatal care attendance and facility birth rates are increasing in Ethiopia but remain well below national goals and global recommendations. Group ANC (G-ANC), when implemented at higher level facilities, is associated with improved quality and experience of ANC, and increased ANC retention and facility-based delivery. The objectives of the study are to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of G-ANC implemented at lower-level facilities (health posts) on ANC continuation and facility-based delivery. Methods G-ANC will first be piloted in five purposively selected health posts. The study will then use a stepped-wedge design in 36 health posts under six health centers, with randomization of the order of the start of the intervention done at the health center level (clusters). The design will include three time periods: first is a six-month control period with no G-ANC implementation, followed by another six months period where G-ANC will be introduced in half (n=18) of the study health posts, then final six months where G-ANC will be implemented in the remaining 18 health posts. Quantitative and qualitative data collection approaches will be used. The study has “pause and reflect” points designed to iterate on the intervention before rolling out to the next set of sites. Qualitative research will be conducted using in-depth interviews with pregnant women, health care workers, facility managers, and regional health managers. 770 women will be enrolled across all phases. Conclusions The study will inform decision makers locally and globally on whether G-ANC is a feasible service delivery model at the health post level. Effectiveness of G-ANC at increasing ANC retention and facility-based delivery will be reported, as well as its acceptability to pregnant women and Health Extension Workers. Registration NCT05054491, ClinicalTrials.gov (September 23rd 2021).\",\"PeriodicalId\":504483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"volume\":\"152 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15190.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15190.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景充分的产前保健(ANC)和设施接生与改善孕产妇和新生儿预后息息相关。在埃塞俄比亚,充足的产前保健就诊率和设施接生率正在上升,但仍远低于国家目标和全球建议。在较高水平的医疗机构实施集体产前检查(G-ANC),可提高产前检查的质量和经验,增加产前检查的保留率和在医疗机构的分娩率。本研究的目标是评估在较低级别的医疗机构(卫生站)实施 G-ANC 的可行性、可接受性以及对产前检查持续率和医疗机构分娩率的影响。研究方法 G-ANC 将首先在五个特选卫生站进行试点。然后,将在 6 个保健中心下属的 36 个保健站采用阶梯式楔形设计进行研究,并在保健中心一级(群组)随机确定干预措施的开始顺序。设计将包括三个时间段:首先是六个月的对照期,不实施 G-ANC;然后是六个月,在一半的研究卫生站(n=18)中引入 G-ANC;最后六个月,在其余 18 个卫生站中实施 G-ANC。将采用定量和定性数据收集方法。这项研究设计了 "暂停和反思 "点,以便在向下一组地点推广之前对干预措施进行迭代。定性研究将通过对孕妇、医护人员、医疗机构管理人员和地区卫生管理人员的深入访谈来进行。所有阶段将有 770 名妇女参加。结论 该研究将为当地和全球的决策者提供信息,帮助他们了解 G-ANC 是否是一种可行的卫生站服务提供模式。将报告 G-ANC 在提高产前护理保留率和设施内分娩率方面的效果,以及孕妇和卫生推广人员对它的接受程度。注册号 NCT05054491,ClinicalTrials.gov(2021 年 9 月 23 日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of Group Antenatal Care at the health post level on continuation in antenatal care and facility based delivery in Ethiopia using a cluster randomized stepped-wedge design: Study protocol
Background Adequate antenatal care (ANC) and facility-based delivery are linked to improved maternal and neonatal outcomes. Adequate antenatal care attendance and facility birth rates are increasing in Ethiopia but remain well below national goals and global recommendations. Group ANC (G-ANC), when implemented at higher level facilities, is associated with improved quality and experience of ANC, and increased ANC retention and facility-based delivery. The objectives of the study are to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of G-ANC implemented at lower-level facilities (health posts) on ANC continuation and facility-based delivery. Methods G-ANC will first be piloted in five purposively selected health posts. The study will then use a stepped-wedge design in 36 health posts under six health centers, with randomization of the order of the start of the intervention done at the health center level (clusters). The design will include three time periods: first is a six-month control period with no G-ANC implementation, followed by another six months period where G-ANC will be introduced in half (n=18) of the study health posts, then final six months where G-ANC will be implemented in the remaining 18 health posts. Quantitative and qualitative data collection approaches will be used. The study has “pause and reflect” points designed to iterate on the intervention before rolling out to the next set of sites. Qualitative research will be conducted using in-depth interviews with pregnant women, health care workers, facility managers, and regional health managers. 770 women will be enrolled across all phases. Conclusions The study will inform decision makers locally and globally on whether G-ANC is a feasible service delivery model at the health post level. Effectiveness of G-ANC at increasing ANC retention and facility-based delivery will be reported, as well as its acceptability to pregnant women and Health Extension Workers. Registration NCT05054491, ClinicalTrials.gov (September 23rd 2021).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Life mapping" exploring the lived experience of COVID-19 on access to HIV treatment and care in Malawi Contraceptive access and use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study in South Africa and Zambia Unpacking WHO and CDC Bottle Bioassay Methods: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Protocol Analysis Revealing Key Outcome Predictors Strengthening district health management and planning: an evaluation of a multi-country initiative in Eastern and Southern Africa Identification of latent contraceptive ideational profiles among urban women in Senegal: Transitions and implications for family planning programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1