分段综合水汽差时间序列中变化点归属的统计方法

IF 3.5 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES International Journal of Climatology Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1002/joc.8441
Khanh Ninh Nguyen, Olivier Bock, Emilie Lebarbier
{"title":"分段综合水汽差时间序列中变化点归属的统计方法","authors":"Khanh Ninh Nguyen,&nbsp;Olivier Bock,&nbsp;Emilie Lebarbier","doi":"10.1002/joc.8441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many segmentation or change-point detection methods for homogenizing climate time series compare candidate station data with reference data to eliminate common climate signals and more efficiently detect spurious, non-climatic changes. One drawback is that it is difficult to decide whether the detected change-point is due to the candidate series or to the reference. A so-called attribution procedure is typically applied in a post-processing step for each detected change-point. This article describes a new statistical method for the attribution of change-points detected in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) minus reanalysis series of integrated water vapour. It requires at least one nearby station with similar GNSS and reanalysis data. Six series of differences are formed from the four base series (BS) and are tested for a significant jump at the time of the change-point detected in the candidate station. The six test results are analysed with a statistical predictive rule to attribute the change-point to one, or several, of the four BS. Original aspects of our method are: (1) the significance test, which is based on a generalized linear regression approach, taking both heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation into account; (2) the predictive rule, which uses a machine learning method and is constructed from the test results obtained with the real data by using a resampling strategy. Four popular machine learning methods have been compared using cross-validation and the best one was applied to a real data set (49 main stations with 114 change-points). The results depend on the choice of the test significance level and the aggregation method combining the prediction results when several nearby stations are available. We find that 62% of the change-points are attributed to GNSS, 19% to the reanalysis, and 10% are due to coincident detections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8441","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A statistical method for the attribution of change-points in segmented Integrated Water Vapor difference time series\",\"authors\":\"Khanh Ninh Nguyen,&nbsp;Olivier Bock,&nbsp;Emilie Lebarbier\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joc.8441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many segmentation or change-point detection methods for homogenizing climate time series compare candidate station data with reference data to eliminate common climate signals and more efficiently detect spurious, non-climatic changes. One drawback is that it is difficult to decide whether the detected change-point is due to the candidate series or to the reference. A so-called attribution procedure is typically applied in a post-processing step for each detected change-point. This article describes a new statistical method for the attribution of change-points detected in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) minus reanalysis series of integrated water vapour. It requires at least one nearby station with similar GNSS and reanalysis data. Six series of differences are formed from the four base series (BS) and are tested for a significant jump at the time of the change-point detected in the candidate station. The six test results are analysed with a statistical predictive rule to attribute the change-point to one, or several, of the four BS. Original aspects of our method are: (1) the significance test, which is based on a generalized linear regression approach, taking both heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation into account; (2) the predictive rule, which uses a machine learning method and is constructed from the test results obtained with the real data by using a resampling strategy. Four popular machine learning methods have been compared using cross-validation and the best one was applied to a real data set (49 main stations with 114 change-points). The results depend on the choice of the test significance level and the aggregation method combining the prediction results when several nearby stations are available. We find that 62% of the change-points are attributed to GNSS, 19% to the reanalysis, and 10% are due to coincident detections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8441\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8441\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多用于气候时间序列同质化的分段或变化点检测方法将候选站数据与参考数据进行比较,以消除共同的气候信号,并更有效地检测虚假的、非气候的变化。这种方法的一个缺点是很难确定检测到的变化点是候选序列造成的,还是参考数据造成的。在后处理步骤中,通常会对每个检测到的变化点采用所谓的归因程序。本文介绍了一种新的统计方法,用于对全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)减去再分析序列的综合水蒸气中探测到的变化点进行归因。该方法要求附近至少有一个具有类似全球导航卫星系统和再分析数据的站点。由四个基序列(BS)形成六个差分序列,并测试候选站检测到变化点时是否有明显的跃变。利用统计预测规则对六个测试结果进行分析,将变化点归因于四个基准序列中的一个或几个。我们方法的独创之处在于(1) 显著性检验,基于广义线性回归方法,同时考虑到异方差和自相关性;(2) 预测规则,使用机器学习方法,通过重采样策略从真实数据测试结果中构建。利用交叉验证对四种常用的机器学习方法进行了比较,并将最佳方法应用于真实数据集(49 个主要站点,114 个变化点)。结果取决于测试显著性水平的选择,以及在有多个邻近站点时预测结果的汇总方法。我们发现,62%的变化点归因于全球导航卫星系统,19%归因于再分析,10%归因于重合探测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A statistical method for the attribution of change-points in segmented Integrated Water Vapor difference time series

Many segmentation or change-point detection methods for homogenizing climate time series compare candidate station data with reference data to eliminate common climate signals and more efficiently detect spurious, non-climatic changes. One drawback is that it is difficult to decide whether the detected change-point is due to the candidate series or to the reference. A so-called attribution procedure is typically applied in a post-processing step for each detected change-point. This article describes a new statistical method for the attribution of change-points detected in Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) minus reanalysis series of integrated water vapour. It requires at least one nearby station with similar GNSS and reanalysis data. Six series of differences are formed from the four base series (BS) and are tested for a significant jump at the time of the change-point detected in the candidate station. The six test results are analysed with a statistical predictive rule to attribute the change-point to one, or several, of the four BS. Original aspects of our method are: (1) the significance test, which is based on a generalized linear regression approach, taking both heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation into account; (2) the predictive rule, which uses a machine learning method and is constructed from the test results obtained with the real data by using a resampling strategy. Four popular machine learning methods have been compared using cross-validation and the best one was applied to a real data set (49 main stations with 114 change-points). The results depend on the choice of the test significance level and the aggregation method combining the prediction results when several nearby stations are available. We find that 62% of the change-points are attributed to GNSS, 19% to the reanalysis, and 10% are due to coincident detections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
期刊最新文献
New insights into trends of rainfall extremes in the Amazon basin through trend‐empirical orthogonal function (1981–2021) Impact of increasing urbanization on heatwaves in Indian cities Use of proxy observations to evaluate the accuracy of precipitation spatial gridding The signature of the main modes of climatic variability as revealed by the Jenkinson‐Collison classification over Europe Observed characteristics and projected future changes of extreme consecutive dry days events of the growing season in Serbia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1