法国的 "假战争

IF 1.7 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Journal of Language and Politics Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1075/jlp.22047.aug
Anaïs Augé
{"title":"法国的 \"假战争","authors":"Anaïs Augé","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22047.aug","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper sheds light on the sociopolitical polarisation reflected in the responses to a political metaphor, in\n French public discourse about covid-19. The aim is to uncover how polarisation may influence metaphorical representation of a\n political issue. The study focuses on the French President’s metaphor “we are at war”, in his announcement of the national\n lockdown. Responses to this “war” metaphor in public discourse are analysed following a combination of metaphor theories and\n argumentation theories. Results show that such responses transformed the ”war” metaphor into the “phoney war” metaphor for\n covid-19. This yielded four main arguments which 1.established causals links between covid-19 and policies, 2.partially endorsed\n the metaphor, 3.focused on the President’s discursive pattern, and 4.focused on the President’s status. It is argued that more\n research is needed into public reception to political discourse, in view of the arguments derived from resistance to metaphor.","PeriodicalId":51676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Politics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"France’s “drôle de guerre”\",\"authors\":\"Anaïs Augé\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jlp.22047.aug\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper sheds light on the sociopolitical polarisation reflected in the responses to a political metaphor, in\\n French public discourse about covid-19. The aim is to uncover how polarisation may influence metaphorical representation of a\\n political issue. The study focuses on the French President’s metaphor “we are at war”, in his announcement of the national\\n lockdown. Responses to this “war” metaphor in public discourse are analysed following a combination of metaphor theories and\\n argumentation theories. Results show that such responses transformed the ”war” metaphor into the “phoney war” metaphor for\\n covid-19. This yielded four main arguments which 1.established causals links between covid-19 and policies, 2.partially endorsed\\n the metaphor, 3.focused on the President’s discursive pattern, and 4.focused on the President’s status. It is argued that more\\n research is needed into public reception to political discourse, in view of the arguments derived from resistance to metaphor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22047.aug\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22047.aug","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文揭示了法国公众在讨论 "科维-19 "时,对一个政治隐喻的反应所反映出的社会政治两极分化。目的是揭示两极分化如何影响政治问题的隐喻表述。研究的重点是法国总统在宣布全国封锁时使用的隐喻 "我们处于战争状态"。结合隐喻理论和论证理论,分析了公共话语中对这一 "战争 "隐喻的反应。结果表明,这些回应将 "战争 "隐喻转化为 covid-19 的 "虚假战争 "隐喻。这产生了四个主要论点:1.建立了 covid-19 与政策之间的因果联系;2.部分认可了隐喻;3.侧重于总统的话语模式;4.侧重于总统的地位。鉴于从抵制隐喻中得出的论点,本文认为需要对公众对政治话语的接受程度进行更多研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
France’s “drôle de guerre”
This paper sheds light on the sociopolitical polarisation reflected in the responses to a political metaphor, in French public discourse about covid-19. The aim is to uncover how polarisation may influence metaphorical representation of a political issue. The study focuses on the French President’s metaphor “we are at war”, in his announcement of the national lockdown. Responses to this “war” metaphor in public discourse are analysed following a combination of metaphor theories and argumentation theories. Results show that such responses transformed the ”war” metaphor into the “phoney war” metaphor for covid-19. This yielded four main arguments which 1.established causals links between covid-19 and policies, 2.partially endorsed the metaphor, 3.focused on the President’s discursive pattern, and 4.focused on the President’s status. It is argued that more research is needed into public reception to political discourse, in view of the arguments derived from resistance to metaphor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Shaping gender policies at the COPs Demarcating rights in divided social worlds Claims of ownership, claims of dignity Reverberations Discourse and transformation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1