酸碱生理学

IF 0.2 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.03.009
Mohamed Abdelmotieleb, Andrew Martin
{"title":"酸碱生理学","authors":"Mohamed Abdelmotieleb,&nbsp;Andrew Martin","doi":"10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.03.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The traditional approach to acid–base physiology is based on the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation which is derived from the CO<sub>2</sub>/HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> buffer system. It is becoming increasingly recognized that this is an incomplete analysis, as it focuses on only one of the six reactions involving H<sup>+</sup>. It can lead to the incorrect assumption that CO<sub>2</sub> and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> are independently adjusted factors, that ultimately determine pH. In 1983, Peter Stewart, a Canadian physiologist, proposed that a fuller understanding of acid–base physiology required consideration of biological fluids as a complex dynamic system, with the interactions of all the chemical species involved considered. He showed that the true independent variables controlling the pH of any given fluid compartment are the difference in the concentration of ‘strong ions’; the total concentration of ‘weak acid’; and the PCO<sub>2</sub>. Importantly, H<sup>+</sup> and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> are dependent variables and it is incorrect to think of them as being specifically regulated to manipulate pH. This review will discuss the importance of pH homeostasis and highlight the implications of the Stewart approach in our understanding of acid–base control mechanisms and disorders. In particular, the true mechanisms by which the kidney regulates plasma pH will be discussed, emphasizing key misconceptions that have been propagated because of the traditional approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45856,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","volume":"25 5","pages":"Pages 327-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acid–base physiology\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Abdelmotieleb,&nbsp;Andrew Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mpaic.2024.03.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The traditional approach to acid–base physiology is based on the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation which is derived from the CO<sub>2</sub>/HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> buffer system. It is becoming increasingly recognized that this is an incomplete analysis, as it focuses on only one of the six reactions involving H<sup>+</sup>. It can lead to the incorrect assumption that CO<sub>2</sub> and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> are independently adjusted factors, that ultimately determine pH. In 1983, Peter Stewart, a Canadian physiologist, proposed that a fuller understanding of acid–base physiology required consideration of biological fluids as a complex dynamic system, with the interactions of all the chemical species involved considered. He showed that the true independent variables controlling the pH of any given fluid compartment are the difference in the concentration of ‘strong ions’; the total concentration of ‘weak acid’; and the PCO<sub>2</sub>. Importantly, H<sup>+</sup> and HCO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup> are dependent variables and it is incorrect to think of them as being specifically regulated to manipulate pH. This review will discuss the importance of pH homeostasis and highlight the implications of the Stewart approach in our understanding of acid–base control mechanisms and disorders. In particular, the true mechanisms by which the kidney regulates plasma pH will be discussed, emphasizing key misconceptions that have been propagated because of the traditional approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 327-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472029924000468\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472029924000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

酸碱生理学的传统方法是基于从 CO2/HCO3- 缓冲系统中推导出的亨德森-哈塞尔巴赫方程。越来越多的人认识到这是一种不全面的分析,因为它只关注涉及 H+ 的六个反应中的一个。它可能导致错误的假设,即 CO2 和 HCO3- 是独立的调节因素,最终决定 pH 值。1983 年,加拿大生理学家彼得-斯图尔特(Peter Stewart)提出,要想更全面地了解酸碱生理学,就必须将生物液体视为一个复杂的动态系统,考虑所有相关化学物种的相互作用。他指出,控制任何给定液体区块 pH 值的真正独立变量是 "强离子 "浓度的差异、"弱酸 "的总浓度以及 PCO2。重要的是,H+ 和 HCO3- 是因变量,将它们视为专门调节 pH 值的变量是不正确的。本综述将讨论 pH 平衡的重要性,并强调斯图尔特方法对我们了解酸碱控制机制和疾病的影响。特别是将讨论肾脏调节血浆 pH 值的真正机制,并强调因传统方法而传播的主要误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acid–base physiology

The traditional approach to acid–base physiology is based on the Henderson–Hasselbalch equation which is derived from the CO2/HCO3- buffer system. It is becoming increasingly recognized that this is an incomplete analysis, as it focuses on only one of the six reactions involving H+. It can lead to the incorrect assumption that CO2 and HCO3- are independently adjusted factors, that ultimately determine pH. In 1983, Peter Stewart, a Canadian physiologist, proposed that a fuller understanding of acid–base physiology required consideration of biological fluids as a complex dynamic system, with the interactions of all the chemical species involved considered. He showed that the true independent variables controlling the pH of any given fluid compartment are the difference in the concentration of ‘strong ions’; the total concentration of ‘weak acid’; and the PCO2. Importantly, H+ and HCO3- are dependent variables and it is incorrect to think of them as being specifically regulated to manipulate pH. This review will discuss the importance of pH homeostasis and highlight the implications of the Stewart approach in our understanding of acid–base control mechanisms and disorders. In particular, the true mechanisms by which the kidney regulates plasma pH will be discussed, emphasizing key misconceptions that have been propagated because of the traditional approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
152
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, an invaluable source of up-to-date information, with the curriculum of both the Primary and Final FRCA examinations covered over a three-year cycle. Published monthly this ever-updating text book will be an invaluable source for both trainee and experienced anaesthetists. The enthusiastic editorial board, under the guidance of two eminent and experienced series editors, ensures Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine covers all the key topics in a comprehensive and authoritative manner. Articles now include learning objectives and eash issue features MCQs, facilitating self-directed learning and enabling readers at all levels to test their knowledge. Each issue is divided between basic scientific and clinical sections. The basic science articles include anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, physics and clinical measurement, while the clinical sections cover anaesthetic agents and techniques, assessment and perioperative management. Further sections cover audit, trials, statistics, ethical and legal medicine, and the management of acute and chronic pain.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Medical gases Spinal anaesthesia Premedication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1