印刷后清洗方法对三维印刷树脂的清洗效率以及表面和机械性能的影响。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026
{"title":"印刷后清洗方法对三维印刷树脂的清洗效率以及表面和机械性能的影响。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div><span><span>Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using </span>resin materials<span> (NextDent C&amp;B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol<span>, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed </span></span></span>tomography<span> (µCT), surface roughness<span><span>, Vickers hardness, and </span>flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005).</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&amp;B MFH specimens (<em>P</em>&lt;.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&amp;B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (<em>P</em>&gt;.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (<em>P</em><span>&gt;.008). In the NextDent C&amp;B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (</span><em>P</em>&lt;.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (<em>P</em>&gt;.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&amp;B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.02.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><div>The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div><span><span>Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using </span>resin materials<span> (NextDent C&amp;B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol<span>, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed </span></span></span>tomography<span> (µCT), surface roughness<span><span>, Vickers hardness, and </span>flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005).</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&amp;B MFH specimens (<em>P</em>&lt;.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&amp;B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (<em>P</em>&gt;.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (<em>P</em><span>&gt;.008). In the NextDent C&amp;B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (</span><em>P</em>&lt;.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (<em>P</em>&gt;.005).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&amp;B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324001513\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324001513","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述光聚合三维(3D)打印的结果受打印后清洗方法的影响,但有关打印后清洗的信息却很少。本体外研究的目的是根据打印后清洗方法评估 3D打印树脂的清洗效率以及表面和机械性能。材料和方法使用树脂材料(NextDent C&B MFH 和 DIOnavi-P. MAX)在三维模型上制作试样,并用异丙醇、异丙醇+超声波、乙醇、乙醇+超声波和单独使用超声波的印模后清洁方法进行 5 分钟的测试。然后进行 5 分钟的后聚合。对试样的清洁效率、微计算机断层扫描(µCT)、表面粗糙度、维氏硬度和抗折强度进行了评估。在考虑正态性后进行了单因素方差分析。结果超声波和清洗液能显著提高 NextDent C&B MFH 试样的清洗效率(P<.005),而超声波对 DIOnavi-P.MAX 试样的清洗效率没有影响。MAX 试样的效率。在 NextDent C&B MFH 和 DIOnavi-P.MAX 中,印后清洁方法对表面粗糙度的影响没有明显差异(P>.005)。MAX(P> .005)。印后清洁方法没有观察到表面硬度的明显变化(P> .008)。在 NextDent C&B MFH 中,乙醇+超声波显著降低了抗折强度(P< .005)。DIOnavi-P.结论乙醇作为 NextDent C&B MFH 和 DIOnavi-P.MAX 的印后清洁溶液与异丙醇的效果相当。MAX.在清洁溶液中添加超声波时应谨慎。这些研究结果表明,根据 3D 打印树脂材料的不同,可以推荐不同的打印后清洁方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of postprinting cleaning methods on the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of three-dimensionally printed resins

Statement of problem

The outcome of photopolymerized 3-dimensional (3D) printing is influenced by the methods used for postprinting cleaning, yet information on postprinting cleaning is sparse.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the cleaning efficiency and surface and mechanical properties of 3D printed resin according to postprinting cleaning methods.

Material and methods

Specimens were fabricated from a 3D model using resin materials (NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX) and were tested for postprinting cleaning methods for 5 minutes with isopropyl alcohol, isopropyl alcohol + ultrasonic, ethyl alcohol, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic, and ultrasonic alone. Postpolymerization was followed for 5 minutes. The cleaning efficiency, microcomputed tomography (µCT), surface roughness, Vickers hardness, and flexural strength of the specimens were evaluated. The 1-way ANOVA test was performed after considering normality. A post hoc analysis with Bonferroni was also performed (α=.008 or.005).

Results

Ultrasonic in addition to cleaning solutions significantly improved the cleaning efficiency in NextDent C&B MFH specimens (P<.005), whereas ultrasonic did not affect the efficiency in DIOnavi-P. MAX specimens. No significant differences were found in surface roughness by postprinting cleaning methods in either NextDent C&B MFH or DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005). No significant changes in surface hardness were observed by postprinting cleaning methods (P>.008). In the NextDent C&B MFH, ethyl alcohol + ultrasonic significantly decreased the flexural strength (P<.005). There were no significant differences in the flexural strength in the DIOnavi-P. MAX (P>.005).

Conclusions

Ethyl alcohol was comparable with isopropyl alcohol for use as a postprinting cleaning solution for both NextDent C&B MFH and DIOnavi-P. MAX. The addition of ultrasonic to cleaning solutions should be applied with caution. These findings suggest that different postprinting cleaning methods can be recommended depending on the 3D printed resin materials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
A method for decontaminating a dental implant and components after abutment screw loosening: A clinical report. Effect of machining method and margin design on the accuracy and margin quality of monolithic zirconia crowns. A digital workflow for recording implant positions and jaw relation for implant-supported complete arch prostheses. Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of a patient after mucormycosis using a digitally fabricated hollow complete denture with 3D printed intramucosal inserts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1