复制还是更新业务模式?动态环境中的绩效效应

IF 7.4 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Long Range Planning Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102440
Cornelis V. Heij, Henk W. Volberda, Rick M.A. Hollen
{"title":"复制还是更新业务模式?动态环境中的绩效效应","authors":"Cornelis V. Heij,&nbsp;Henk W. Volberda,&nbsp;Rick M.A. Hollen","doi":"10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is often assumed that business model innovation drives firm performance, especially when firms operate in highly dynamic environments. However, despite the rise in research on business models, there is little systematic evidence of how various levels of environmental dynamism actually influence the performance effects of two basic types of business model innovation, namely replication (i.e., scaling up and improving an existing business model) and renewal (i.e., introducing a new business model). In this paper, we delineate a conceptual distinction between these two types of business model innovation and investigate how environmental dynamism impacts their performance outcomes. Based on a cross-industry survey that includes both SMEs and larger firms, we show that environmental dynamism weakens the positive effects of business model replication on firm performance. By contrast, in environments where the level of dynamism is intermediate, rather than high or low, environmental dynamism strengthens the performance effects of business model renewal. We discuss how these insights contribute to the business model innovation literature and how they can provide top managers with guidance on when and how to innovate a business model to turn it into a competitive advantage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18141,"journal":{"name":"Long Range Planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002463012400027X/pdfft?md5=fac2003a5eba6972d82c026e1d577c2b&pid=1-s2.0-S002463012400027X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To replicate or to renew your business model? The performance effect in dynamic environments\",\"authors\":\"Cornelis V. Heij,&nbsp;Henk W. Volberda,&nbsp;Rick M.A. Hollen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lrp.2024.102440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It is often assumed that business model innovation drives firm performance, especially when firms operate in highly dynamic environments. However, despite the rise in research on business models, there is little systematic evidence of how various levels of environmental dynamism actually influence the performance effects of two basic types of business model innovation, namely replication (i.e., scaling up and improving an existing business model) and renewal (i.e., introducing a new business model). In this paper, we delineate a conceptual distinction between these two types of business model innovation and investigate how environmental dynamism impacts their performance outcomes. Based on a cross-industry survey that includes both SMEs and larger firms, we show that environmental dynamism weakens the positive effects of business model replication on firm performance. By contrast, in environments where the level of dynamism is intermediate, rather than high or low, environmental dynamism strengthens the performance effects of business model renewal. We discuss how these insights contribute to the business model innovation literature and how they can provide top managers with guidance on when and how to innovate a business model to turn it into a competitive advantage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Long Range Planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002463012400027X/pdfft?md5=fac2003a5eba6972d82c026e1d577c2b&pid=1-s2.0-S002463012400027X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Long Range Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002463012400027X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Long Range Planning","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002463012400027X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们通常认为,商业模式创新会推动企业绩效,尤其是当企业在高度动态的环境中运营时。然而,尽管有关商业模式的研究不断增加,但几乎没有系统性的证据表明,不同程度的环境动态究竟如何影响两种基本类型的商业模式创新,即复制(即扩大和改进现有商业模式)和更新(即引入新的商业模式)的绩效效应。在本文中,我们从概念上区分了这两种类型的商业模式创新,并研究了环境动态如何影响它们的绩效结果。基于一项包括中小型企业和大型企业在内的跨行业调查,我们发现环境动态削弱了商业模式复制对企业绩效的积极影响。相比之下,在动态水平处于中间而非高低的环境中,环境动态会增强商业模式更新的绩效效应。我们将讨论这些见解对商业模式创新文献的贡献,以及如何为高层管理者提供指导,帮助他们了解何时以及如何创新商业模式,将其转化为竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To replicate or to renew your business model? The performance effect in dynamic environments

It is often assumed that business model innovation drives firm performance, especially when firms operate in highly dynamic environments. However, despite the rise in research on business models, there is little systematic evidence of how various levels of environmental dynamism actually influence the performance effects of two basic types of business model innovation, namely replication (i.e., scaling up and improving an existing business model) and renewal (i.e., introducing a new business model). In this paper, we delineate a conceptual distinction between these two types of business model innovation and investigate how environmental dynamism impacts their performance outcomes. Based on a cross-industry survey that includes both SMEs and larger firms, we show that environmental dynamism weakens the positive effects of business model replication on firm performance. By contrast, in environments where the level of dynamism is intermediate, rather than high or low, environmental dynamism strengthens the performance effects of business model renewal. We discuss how these insights contribute to the business model innovation literature and how they can provide top managers with guidance on when and how to innovate a business model to turn it into a competitive advantage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Long Range Planning (LRP) is an internationally renowned journal specializing in the field of strategic management. Since its establishment in 1968, the journal has consistently published original research, garnering a strong reputation among academics. LRP actively encourages the submission of articles that involve empirical research and theoretical perspectives, including studies that provide critical assessments and analysis of the current state of knowledge in crucial strategic areas. The primary user base of LRP primarily comprises individuals from academic backgrounds, with the journal playing a dual role within this community. Firstly, it serves as a platform for the dissemination of research findings among academic researchers. Secondly, it serves as a channel for the transmission of ideas that can be effectively utilized in educational settings. The articles published in LRP cater to a diverse audience, including practicing managers and students in professional programs. While some articles may focus on practical applications, others may primarily target academic researchers. LRP adopts an inclusive approach to empirical research, accepting studies that draw on various methodologies such as primary survey data, archival data, case studies, and recognized approaches to data collection.
期刊最新文献
A layered governance approach to regulating Big Tech New blood brings change: Exploring the link between rookie independent directors and corporate cash holdings A balancing act: Independent and interdependent effects of board of directors and top management team gender composition on innovation Investment horizon, slack resources, and firm performance: Evidence from privately held european firms Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1