阴茎保留和重建:爱尔兰共和国全国阴茎癌集中治疗的 5 年结果。

{"title":"阴茎保留和重建:爱尔兰共和国全国阴茎癌集中治疗的 5 年结果。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Penile cancer is a rare urological </span>malignancy with an age-standardised incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Given this low incidence it has been suggested that centralised care may improve patient outcomes in relation to </span>phallus sparing surgery and nodal assessment [2]. We aim to assess the outcomes after 5-years of national centralisation of penile cancer care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All patients undergoing penile cancer surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 following centralisation of care were included. The primary outcome was proportion of phallus sparing procedures performed. Secondary outcomes were patient characteristics, histologic outcomes and procedures performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>124 patients underwent surgery in the study period. Mean age was 64.49 (±13.87). Overall, 82.3% of patients underwent phallus sparing surgery. This remained stable over the 5-year period from 2018 to 2022 ​at 92%, 85%, 76%, 79% and 78% respectively (p ​= ​0.534). 62.7% had reconstruction performed, including split-thickness skin graft neoglans formation, (57.8% [n ​= ​37]), preputial flap (32.8% [n ​= ​21]), glans resurfacing (4.7% [n ​= ​3]), shaft advancement flap (1.6% [n ​= ​1]), penile shaft skin graft (1.6% [n ​= ​1]), and partial </span>penectomy with urethral centralisation (1.6% [n ​= ​1]). Phallus preservation was not affected by positive nodal status (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.249–2.266], p ​= ​0.564) or T-stage ≥1b (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.153–1.711], p ​= ​0.276). There has been a significant reduction in Nx nodal status from 64% in 2017 to 15% in 2021 (p ​= ​0.009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Centralisation of treatment for rare malignancies such as penile cancer may improve oncologic outcomes and rates of phallus preservation. This study has shown centralisation to has a high rate of phallus preservation. Further long-term analysis of outcomes in Ireland is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 5","pages":"Pages 292-295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phallus preservation and reconstruction: 5-year outcomes of national penile cancer centralisation in the Republic of Ireland\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p><span><span>Penile cancer is a rare urological </span>malignancy with an age-standardised incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Given this low incidence it has been suggested that centralised care may improve patient outcomes in relation to </span>phallus sparing surgery and nodal assessment [2]. We aim to assess the outcomes after 5-years of national centralisation of penile cancer care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All patients undergoing penile cancer surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 following centralisation of care were included. The primary outcome was proportion of phallus sparing procedures performed. Secondary outcomes were patient characteristics, histologic outcomes and procedures performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p><span>124 patients underwent surgery in the study period. Mean age was 64.49 (±13.87). Overall, 82.3% of patients underwent phallus sparing surgery. This remained stable over the 5-year period from 2018 to 2022 ​at 92%, 85%, 76%, 79% and 78% respectively (p ​= ​0.534). 62.7% had reconstruction performed, including split-thickness skin graft neoglans formation, (57.8% [n ​= ​37]), preputial flap (32.8% [n ​= ​21]), glans resurfacing (4.7% [n ​= ​3]), shaft advancement flap (1.6% [n ​= ​1]), penile shaft skin graft (1.6% [n ​= ​1]), and partial </span>penectomy with urethral centralisation (1.6% [n ​= ​1]). Phallus preservation was not affected by positive nodal status (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.249–2.266], p ​= ​0.564) or T-stage ≥1b (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.153–1.711], p ​= ​0.276). There has been a significant reduction in Nx nodal status from 64% in 2017 to 15% in 2021 (p ​= ​0.009).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Centralisation of treatment for rare malignancies such as penile cancer may improve oncologic outcomes and rates of phallus preservation. This study has shown centralisation to has a high rate of phallus preservation. Further long-term analysis of outcomes in Ireland is required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 292-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000337\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000337","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 阴茎癌是一种罕见的泌尿系统恶性肿瘤,年龄标准化发病率为每 10 万人年 0.8 例[1]。鉴于发病率较低,有人认为集中治疗可改善患者在阴茎切除手术和结节评估方面的预后[2]。我们旨在评估全国阴茎癌集中治疗 5 年后的疗效。方法对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析,纳入了 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月集中护理后接受阴茎癌手术的所有患者。主要结果是所实施的阴茎切除手术的比例。次要结果为患者特征、组织学结果和所实施的手术。平均年龄为 64.49 (±13.87)岁。总体而言,82.3%的患者接受了保留阴茎手术。从2018年到2022年的5年间,这一比例保持稳定,分别为92%、85%、76%、79%和78%(p = 0.534)。62.7%的患者进行了重建手术,包括分层厚皮移植新阴茎形成术(57.8% [n = 37])、阴茎前皮瓣(32.8% [n = 21])、龟头重塑术(4.7% [n = 3])、阴茎轴前移皮瓣(1.6% [n = 1])、阴茎轴植皮术(1.6% [n = 1])和阴茎部分切除并尿道集中术(1.6% [n = 1])。阴茎保留不受结节阳性状态(OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.249-2.266],p = 0.564)或 T 分期≥1b(OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.153-1.711],p = 0.276)的影响。Nx结节状态从2017年的64%大幅降至2021年的15%(p = 0.009)。结论集中治疗阴茎癌等罕见恶性肿瘤可改善肿瘤治疗效果和阴茎保留率。这项研究表明,集中化治疗具有较高的阴茎保留率。需要对爱尔兰的治疗效果进行进一步的长期分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Phallus preservation and reconstruction: 5-year outcomes of national penile cancer centralisation in the Republic of Ireland

Introduction

Penile cancer is a rare urological malignancy with an age-standardised incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Given this low incidence it has been suggested that centralised care may improve patient outcomes in relation to phallus sparing surgery and nodal assessment [2]. We aim to assess the outcomes after 5-years of national centralisation of penile cancer care.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All patients undergoing penile cancer surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 following centralisation of care were included. The primary outcome was proportion of phallus sparing procedures performed. Secondary outcomes were patient characteristics, histologic outcomes and procedures performed.

Results

124 patients underwent surgery in the study period. Mean age was 64.49 (±13.87). Overall, 82.3% of patients underwent phallus sparing surgery. This remained stable over the 5-year period from 2018 to 2022 ​at 92%, 85%, 76%, 79% and 78% respectively (p ​= ​0.534). 62.7% had reconstruction performed, including split-thickness skin graft neoglans formation, (57.8% [n ​= ​37]), preputial flap (32.8% [n ​= ​21]), glans resurfacing (4.7% [n ​= ​3]), shaft advancement flap (1.6% [n ​= ​1]), penile shaft skin graft (1.6% [n ​= ​1]), and partial penectomy with urethral centralisation (1.6% [n ​= ​1]). Phallus preservation was not affected by positive nodal status (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.249–2.266], p ​= ​0.564) or T-stage ≥1b (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.153–1.711], p ​= ​0.276). There has been a significant reduction in Nx nodal status from 64% in 2017 to 15% in 2021 (p ​= ​0.009).

Conclusion

Centralisation of treatment for rare malignancies such as penile cancer may improve oncologic outcomes and rates of phallus preservation. This study has shown centralisation to has a high rate of phallus preservation. Further long-term analysis of outcomes in Ireland is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination. A boost to concentration or a distracting noise? A systematic review of surgeon and anaesthetist perspectives of the benefit of intra-operative music. List of editors Surgeon ability to predict physical activity and sedentary time: Comparison of self-reported and measured activity Sensitivity and specificity of surgeons' intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1