碳普惠制(CGSP)计划:关键设计因素和潜在参与者的态度

IF 2.4 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2024-04-25 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101205
Ruoyu Chen , Suyang Xu , Yiling Du , Yiming Wu , Shiyu Zhao , Ran Tu , Chenyang Wu
{"title":"碳普惠制(CGSP)计划:关键设计因素和潜在参与者的态度","authors":"Ruoyu Chen ,&nbsp;Suyang Xu ,&nbsp;Yiling Du ,&nbsp;Yiming Wu ,&nbsp;Shiyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Ran Tu ,&nbsp;Chenyang Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP) is a tool that employs monetary or non-monetary incentives to promote sustainable behaviors. While CGSP pilot programs have been initiated, its main design dimensions and people’s preferences for these dimensions remain unexplored. This study developed a two-stage framework to summarize key components of the CGSP’s design and delve into participants’ preferences for various CGSP designs. Our findings indicate that individuals aged over 30, with comparatively higher incomes, and living within smaller households, tend to exhibit tendencies towards high-emission travel. Regarding interviewees’ preferences for the key design dimensions of the CGSP, a unanimous consensus emerges that the government should play a leading role in CGSP development. While divergences exist, most interviewees lean towards CGSP programs being voluntary in nature, city-level in scope, and possessing mid-term billing cycles (monthly to semi-annually). Attitudes towards monetary incentives display significant variation among interviewees, with those working in the transportation industry generally exhibiting a greater affinity for non-monetary incentives. The majority of interviewees express comfort with personal information collection for the CGSP, particularly among potential low-emission travelers. This study provides valuable insights for designing and promoting CGSP mechanisms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000609/pdfft?md5=28a89fb056b9bc020bb704c752670da3&pid=1-s2.0-S2213624X24000609-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP) programs: Key design dimensions and attitudes of potential participants\",\"authors\":\"Ruoyu Chen ,&nbsp;Suyang Xu ,&nbsp;Yiling Du ,&nbsp;Yiming Wu ,&nbsp;Shiyu Zhao ,&nbsp;Ran Tu ,&nbsp;Chenyang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP) is a tool that employs monetary or non-monetary incentives to promote sustainable behaviors. While CGSP pilot programs have been initiated, its main design dimensions and people’s preferences for these dimensions remain unexplored. This study developed a two-stage framework to summarize key components of the CGSP’s design and delve into participants’ preferences for various CGSP designs. Our findings indicate that individuals aged over 30, with comparatively higher incomes, and living within smaller households, tend to exhibit tendencies towards high-emission travel. Regarding interviewees’ preferences for the key design dimensions of the CGSP, a unanimous consensus emerges that the government should play a leading role in CGSP development. While divergences exist, most interviewees lean towards CGSP programs being voluntary in nature, city-level in scope, and possessing mid-term billing cycles (monthly to semi-annually). Attitudes towards monetary incentives display significant variation among interviewees, with those working in the transportation industry generally exhibiting a greater affinity for non-monetary incentives. The majority of interviewees express comfort with personal information collection for the CGSP, particularly among potential low-emission travelers. This study provides valuable insights for designing and promoting CGSP mechanisms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000609/pdfft?md5=28a89fb056b9bc020bb704c752670da3&pid=1-s2.0-S2213624X24000609-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies on Transport Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000609\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24000609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

碳普惠制(CGSP)是一种利用货币或非货币激励来促进可持续行为的工具。虽然碳普惠制试点项目已经启动,但其主要设计维度和人们对这些维度的偏好仍未得到探索。本研究建立了一个两阶段框架,以总结 CGSP 设计的主要组成部分,并深入研究参与者对各种 CGSP 设计的偏好。我们的研究结果表明,30 岁以上、收入相对较高、生活在小家庭中的个人倾向于高排放出行。关于受访者对 CGSP 主要设计方面的偏好,一个一致的共识是政府应在 CGSP 的发展中发挥主导作用。虽然存在分歧,但大多数受访者倾向于 CGSP 项目的自愿性质、城市级别范围以及中期计费周期(每月至半年)。受访者对货币激励措施的态度存在很大差异,从事运输行业的受访者一般更倾向于非货币激励措施。大多数受访者对 CGSP 的个人信息收集表示满意,尤其是潜在的低排放旅行者。这项研究为设计和推广 CGSP 机制提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP) programs: Key design dimensions and attitudes of potential participants

The Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP) is a tool that employs monetary or non-monetary incentives to promote sustainable behaviors. While CGSP pilot programs have been initiated, its main design dimensions and people’s preferences for these dimensions remain unexplored. This study developed a two-stage framework to summarize key components of the CGSP’s design and delve into participants’ preferences for various CGSP designs. Our findings indicate that individuals aged over 30, with comparatively higher incomes, and living within smaller households, tend to exhibit tendencies towards high-emission travel. Regarding interviewees’ preferences for the key design dimensions of the CGSP, a unanimous consensus emerges that the government should play a leading role in CGSP development. While divergences exist, most interviewees lean towards CGSP programs being voluntary in nature, city-level in scope, and possessing mid-term billing cycles (monthly to semi-annually). Attitudes towards monetary incentives display significant variation among interviewees, with those working in the transportation industry generally exhibiting a greater affinity for non-monetary incentives. The majority of interviewees express comfort with personal information collection for the CGSP, particularly among potential low-emission travelers. This study provides valuable insights for designing and promoting CGSP mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
Fuelling the pandemic: The impact of fuel prices on COVID-19 COVID-19 and its influence on the propensity to work from home between March 2020 and June 2021 Simulation modeling of passengers flow at airport terminals to reduce delay and enhance level of service Optimization of transport sustainability index to conserve resources: A case study of Delhi, India The effect of airline service quality, perceived value, emotional attachment, and brand loyalty on passengers’ willingness to pay: The moderating role of airline origin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1