评估手术室间隔时间指标时应考虑专科急诊情况

Aakanksha Gupta MD, Joseph V. Lombardi MD, MBA, Mikael Fadoul MD,, Bruce L. Tjaden MD, Philip Batista MD, Jeffery Carpenter MD, Katherine McMackin MD
{"title":"评估手术室间隔时间指标时应考虑专科急诊情况","authors":"Aakanksha Gupta MD,&nbsp;Joseph V. Lombardi MD, MBA,&nbsp;Mikael Fadoul MD,,&nbsp;Bruce L. Tjaden MD,&nbsp;Philip Batista MD,&nbsp;Jeffery Carpenter MD,&nbsp;Katherine McMackin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Operating room (OR) utilization is a key metric of productivity for surgeons and surgical services. It is defined as total hours of elective surgery performed within OR block time, including turnover time, divided by the hours of allocated block time. To maximize this metric, hospitals have OR release times built in, which often trigger 72 hours prior to the start of the day. Vascular surgery is among several disciplines that carry a high number of urgent case bookings that require last minute OR availability. The purpose of this study was to examine OR release policy within our own institution in the context of the number of cases booked after the release period by vascular surgery and other surgical services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-center retrospective review of all cases done by the Department of Surgery between October 2021 and October 2022 at a tertiary care university hospital was performed. Urgent cases were defined as those booked within 48 hours of the procedure. Total cases, inpatient vs outpatient/preadmit designation, number of urgent cases booked, OR utilization, and surgeon division were collated. included divisions were vascular (5 surgeons), colorectal (3 surgeons), bariatrics (2 surgeons), breast (7 surgeons), acute care (10 surgeons), general (8 surgeons), plastics (8 surgeons), otolaryngology (5 surgeons), and urology (6 surgeons). Additionally, we propose a novel method to calculate OR utilization based on the number of urgent cases performed by each specialty.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 9295 surgeries were performed by 54 surgeons. Of the surgeries, 1849 were performed on inpatients. Vascular surgeons accounted for 9% of surgeons in the study and booked 372 urgent cases (26%), representing the highest of all divisions including acute care surgery, who booked 180 urgent cases (13%). In addition, vascular surgery performed 26% (n = 476) of all inpatient surgeries during the study period, which made up over one-half (55%) of the total vascular volume of 865 cases. This was the highest percentage of inpatients throughout the surgical service line. Despite this, vascular surgery had one of the lowest OR utilizations at 65% during this time period. However, after accounting for number of urgent cases using the proposed formula, vascular surgery's adjusted OR utilization was found to be 115.7%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ensuring OR availability for services that have high urgency and substantial inpatient volume may allow greater system throughput, patient satisfaction, decreased length of stay, and lower surgeon stress burden. Vascular surgeons had the highest urgent and inpatient case volume of all examined surgical specialties. Hybrid OR availability and allocation of block time for vascular services should be reflected in the need to accommodate this operative climate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272400028X/pdfft?md5=927b3561182af332fd7fb829650c04fe&pid=1-s2.0-S294991272400028X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Specialty acuity should be a consideration while assessing operating room block time metrics\",\"authors\":\"Aakanksha Gupta MD,&nbsp;Joseph V. Lombardi MD, MBA,&nbsp;Mikael Fadoul MD,,&nbsp;Bruce L. Tjaden MD,&nbsp;Philip Batista MD,&nbsp;Jeffery Carpenter MD,&nbsp;Katherine McMackin MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2024.100080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Operating room (OR) utilization is a key metric of productivity for surgeons and surgical services. It is defined as total hours of elective surgery performed within OR block time, including turnover time, divided by the hours of allocated block time. To maximize this metric, hospitals have OR release times built in, which often trigger 72 hours prior to the start of the day. Vascular surgery is among several disciplines that carry a high number of urgent case bookings that require last minute OR availability. The purpose of this study was to examine OR release policy within our own institution in the context of the number of cases booked after the release period by vascular surgery and other surgical services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-center retrospective review of all cases done by the Department of Surgery between October 2021 and October 2022 at a tertiary care university hospital was performed. Urgent cases were defined as those booked within 48 hours of the procedure. Total cases, inpatient vs outpatient/preadmit designation, number of urgent cases booked, OR utilization, and surgeon division were collated. included divisions were vascular (5 surgeons), colorectal (3 surgeons), bariatrics (2 surgeons), breast (7 surgeons), acute care (10 surgeons), general (8 surgeons), plastics (8 surgeons), otolaryngology (5 surgeons), and urology (6 surgeons). Additionally, we propose a novel method to calculate OR utilization based on the number of urgent cases performed by each specialty.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 9295 surgeries were performed by 54 surgeons. Of the surgeries, 1849 were performed on inpatients. Vascular surgeons accounted for 9% of surgeons in the study and booked 372 urgent cases (26%), representing the highest of all divisions including acute care surgery, who booked 180 urgent cases (13%). In addition, vascular surgery performed 26% (n = 476) of all inpatient surgeries during the study period, which made up over one-half (55%) of the total vascular volume of 865 cases. This was the highest percentage of inpatients throughout the surgical service line. Despite this, vascular surgery had one of the lowest OR utilizations at 65% during this time period. However, after accounting for number of urgent cases using the proposed formula, vascular surgery's adjusted OR utilization was found to be 115.7%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Ensuring OR availability for services that have high urgency and substantial inpatient volume may allow greater system throughput, patient satisfaction, decreased length of stay, and lower surgeon stress burden. Vascular surgeons had the highest urgent and inpatient case volume of all examined surgical specialties. Hybrid OR availability and allocation of block time for vascular services should be reflected in the need to accommodate this operative climate.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272400028X/pdfft?md5=927b3561182af332fd7fb829650c04fe&pid=1-s2.0-S294991272400028X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JVS-vascular insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272400028X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272400028X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标手术室(OR)利用率是衡量外科医生和手术服务效率的关键指标。它的定义是在手术室分块时间内完成的择期手术总时数(包括周转时间)除以分配的分块时间时数。为了最大限度地提高这一指标,医院规定了手术室释放时间,通常在一天开始前 72 小时触发。血管外科是紧急病例预约较多的几个学科之一,需要在最后一分钟提供手术室。本研究的目的是根据血管外科和其他外科手术服务在手术室开放期后预约的病例数量,研究本院的手术室开放政策。方法对一家三级医疗大学医院外科在 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月期间完成的所有病例进行单中心回顾性审查。急诊病例是指在手术后 48 小时内预约的病例。我们整理了总病例数、住院病人与门诊病人/分科指定、预订的紧急病例数、手术室使用率和外科医生分科。包括的分科有血管科(5 名外科医生)、结直肠科(3 名外科医生)、减肥科(2 名外科医生)、乳腺科(7 名外科医生)、急症护理科(10 名外科医生)、普通科(8 名外科医生)、整形外科(8 名外科医生)、耳鼻喉科(5 名外科医生)和泌尿科(6 名外科医生)。此外,我们还提出了一种新方法,根据各专科急诊病例的数量来计算手术室的利用率。其中,1849 例手术是为住院病人实施的。研究中,血管外科医生占外科医生总数的 9%,预订了 372 例急诊病例(26%),在所有科室中占比最高,其中急诊外科预订了 180 例急诊病例(13%)。此外,在研究期间,血管外科实施的手术占所有住院手术的 26%(476 例),在 865 例血管手术中占二分之一以上(55%)。这是整个外科服务项目中住院患者比例最高的。尽管如此,血管外科在这一时期的手术室使用率却最低,仅为 65%。然而,在使用建议的公式计算出急诊病例数量后,血管外科的调整后手术室利用率为 115.7%。结论确保高急诊率和大量住院病人的手术室可用性,可以提高系统吞吐量、患者满意度、缩短住院时间并减轻外科医生的压力负担。在所有接受检查的外科专科中,血管外科医生的急诊和住院病例量最高。混合手术室的可用性和血管服务的分块时间分配应反映出适应这种手术环境的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Specialty acuity should be a consideration while assessing operating room block time metrics

Objective

Operating room (OR) utilization is a key metric of productivity for surgeons and surgical services. It is defined as total hours of elective surgery performed within OR block time, including turnover time, divided by the hours of allocated block time. To maximize this metric, hospitals have OR release times built in, which often trigger 72 hours prior to the start of the day. Vascular surgery is among several disciplines that carry a high number of urgent case bookings that require last minute OR availability. The purpose of this study was to examine OR release policy within our own institution in the context of the number of cases booked after the release period by vascular surgery and other surgical services.

Methods

A single-center retrospective review of all cases done by the Department of Surgery between October 2021 and October 2022 at a tertiary care university hospital was performed. Urgent cases were defined as those booked within 48 hours of the procedure. Total cases, inpatient vs outpatient/preadmit designation, number of urgent cases booked, OR utilization, and surgeon division were collated. included divisions were vascular (5 surgeons), colorectal (3 surgeons), bariatrics (2 surgeons), breast (7 surgeons), acute care (10 surgeons), general (8 surgeons), plastics (8 surgeons), otolaryngology (5 surgeons), and urology (6 surgeons). Additionally, we propose a novel method to calculate OR utilization based on the number of urgent cases performed by each specialty.

Results

A total of 9295 surgeries were performed by 54 surgeons. Of the surgeries, 1849 were performed on inpatients. Vascular surgeons accounted for 9% of surgeons in the study and booked 372 urgent cases (26%), representing the highest of all divisions including acute care surgery, who booked 180 urgent cases (13%). In addition, vascular surgery performed 26% (n = 476) of all inpatient surgeries during the study period, which made up over one-half (55%) of the total vascular volume of 865 cases. This was the highest percentage of inpatients throughout the surgical service line. Despite this, vascular surgery had one of the lowest OR utilizations at 65% during this time period. However, after accounting for number of urgent cases using the proposed formula, vascular surgery's adjusted OR utilization was found to be 115.7%.

Conclusions

Ensuring OR availability for services that have high urgency and substantial inpatient volume may allow greater system throughput, patient satisfaction, decreased length of stay, and lower surgeon stress burden. Vascular surgeons had the highest urgent and inpatient case volume of all examined surgical specialties. Hybrid OR availability and allocation of block time for vascular services should be reflected in the need to accommodate this operative climate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS” An Assessment of Racial Diversity in Vascular Surgery Educational Resources The use of artificial intelligence in three-dimensional imaging modalities and diabetic foot disease – a systematic review Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1