RESPCCT 研究:由社区主导开发以人为本的工具,用于衡量围产期服务中的健康公平性

S. Vedam, Kathrin Stoll, Lesley Tarasoff, Wanda Phillips-Beck, Winnie Lo, Kate MacDonald, Ariane Metellus, Michael Rost, Muriel Scott, Karen Hodge, Mo Korchinski, Marit van der Pijl, Cristina Alonso, Esther Clark, Ali Tatum, Rachel Olson, Kathy Xie, Mary Decker, Karolina Wenzel, Alexandra Roine, Wendy Hall
{"title":"RESPCCT 研究:由社区主导开发以人为本的工具,用于衡量围产期服务中的健康公平性","authors":"S. Vedam, Kathrin Stoll, Lesley Tarasoff, Wanda Phillips-Beck, Winnie Lo, Kate MacDonald, Ariane Metellus, Michael Rost, Muriel Scott, Karen Hodge, Mo Korchinski, Marit van der Pijl, Cristina Alonso, Esther Clark, Ali Tatum, Rachel Olson, Kathy Xie, Mary Decker, Karolina Wenzel, Alexandra Roine, Wendy Hall","doi":"10.35844/001c.94399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While Canadian maternal mortality rates suggest widespread access to high-quality care, perinatal health care outcomes and care experiences among pregnant people in Canada vary widely, particularly among communities that have been historically oppressed, excluded, and marginalized. The lack of patient-oriented research and measurement in perinatal services led to the RESPCCT (Research Examining the Stories of Pregnancy and Childbirth in Canada Today) Study which used a community participatory action research (CPAR) approach to examine experiences of pregnancy and childbirth care. In this paper, we describe co-creation of a person-centered survey instrument that measures respect, disrespect and mistreatment during pregnancy-related care of individuals with diverse identities, backgrounds and circumstances. The study was co-led by a Community Steering Council alongside a multi-disciplinary group of researchers and clinicians, and pilot tested by service users from across Canada. The final survey instrument includes items that assess respectful care across 17 domains, including validated measures of autonomy, respect, mistreatment, trauma, and discrimination. It also captures information about respondents’ identities, backgrounds, circumstances, access to care, provider type, and outcomes. A total of 6096 individuals participated in the survey. We describe how we implemented CPAR best practices, strengths, challenges, and lessons learned for instrument development in reproductive justice research.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The RESPCCT Study: Community-led Development of a Person-Centered Instrument to Measure Health Equity in Perinatal Services\",\"authors\":\"S. Vedam, Kathrin Stoll, Lesley Tarasoff, Wanda Phillips-Beck, Winnie Lo, Kate MacDonald, Ariane Metellus, Michael Rost, Muriel Scott, Karen Hodge, Mo Korchinski, Marit van der Pijl, Cristina Alonso, Esther Clark, Ali Tatum, Rachel Olson, Kathy Xie, Mary Decker, Karolina Wenzel, Alexandra Roine, Wendy Hall\",\"doi\":\"10.35844/001c.94399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While Canadian maternal mortality rates suggest widespread access to high-quality care, perinatal health care outcomes and care experiences among pregnant people in Canada vary widely, particularly among communities that have been historically oppressed, excluded, and marginalized. The lack of patient-oriented research and measurement in perinatal services led to the RESPCCT (Research Examining the Stories of Pregnancy and Childbirth in Canada Today) Study which used a community participatory action research (CPAR) approach to examine experiences of pregnancy and childbirth care. In this paper, we describe co-creation of a person-centered survey instrument that measures respect, disrespect and mistreatment during pregnancy-related care of individuals with diverse identities, backgrounds and circumstances. The study was co-led by a Community Steering Council alongside a multi-disciplinary group of researchers and clinicians, and pilot tested by service users from across Canada. The final survey instrument includes items that assess respectful care across 17 domains, including validated measures of autonomy, respect, mistreatment, trauma, and discrimination. It also captures information about respondents’ identities, backgrounds, circumstances, access to care, provider type, and outcomes. A total of 6096 individuals participated in the survey. We describe how we implemented CPAR best practices, strengths, challenges, and lessons learned for instrument development in reproductive justice research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of participatory research methods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of participatory research methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.94399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.94399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然加拿大的孕产妇死亡率表明高质量的医疗服务非常普及,但加拿大孕妇的围产期保健结果和护理经验却千差万别,尤其是在历史上一直受到压迫、排斥和边缘化的社区。由于在围产期服务方面缺乏以患者为导向的研究和测量,因此开展了 "RESPCCT(Research Examining the Stories of Pregnancy and Childbirth in Canada Today)研究",该研究采用了社区参与行动研究(CPAR)的方法来考察怀孕和分娩护理经验。在本文中,我们介绍了共同创建以人为本的调查工具的情况,该工具可测量具有不同身份、背景和环境的个人在与妊娠相关的护理过程中受到的尊重、不尊重和虐待。这项研究由社区指导委员会与由研究人员和临床医生组成的多学科小组共同领导,并由来自加拿大各地的服务使用者进行试点测试。最终的调查工具包括评估 17 个领域的尊重护理的项目,其中包括自主、尊重、虐待、创伤和歧视的有效测量。它还收集了有关受访者身份、背景、环境、获得护理的机会、提供者类型和结果的信息。共有 6096 人参与了调查。我们介绍了如何在生殖公正研究中实施 CPAR 最佳实践、优势、挑战和工具开发方面的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The RESPCCT Study: Community-led Development of a Person-Centered Instrument to Measure Health Equity in Perinatal Services
While Canadian maternal mortality rates suggest widespread access to high-quality care, perinatal health care outcomes and care experiences among pregnant people in Canada vary widely, particularly among communities that have been historically oppressed, excluded, and marginalized. The lack of patient-oriented research and measurement in perinatal services led to the RESPCCT (Research Examining the Stories of Pregnancy and Childbirth in Canada Today) Study which used a community participatory action research (CPAR) approach to examine experiences of pregnancy and childbirth care. In this paper, we describe co-creation of a person-centered survey instrument that measures respect, disrespect and mistreatment during pregnancy-related care of individuals with diverse identities, backgrounds and circumstances. The study was co-led by a Community Steering Council alongside a multi-disciplinary group of researchers and clinicians, and pilot tested by service users from across Canada. The final survey instrument includes items that assess respectful care across 17 domains, including validated measures of autonomy, respect, mistreatment, trauma, and discrimination. It also captures information about respondents’ identities, backgrounds, circumstances, access to care, provider type, and outcomes. A total of 6096 individuals participated in the survey. We describe how we implemented CPAR best practices, strengths, challenges, and lessons learned for instrument development in reproductive justice research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: ”How Communities and Research Institutions Work Together to Dismantle Structural Racism and Advance Health Equity” Program Evaluation and Improvement by a Homeless Community Using a Human Centered Design Approach The RESPCCT Study: Community-led Development of a Person-Centered Instrument to Measure Health Equity in Perinatal Services The Equity-Centered Participatory Compensation Model (EPCM): A Tutorial for This Emergent Methodology Amplifying Youth Voices Using Digital Technology: A Case Study in Collaborative Research With Youth Service Organizations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1