{"title":"一些医生对照顾残疾患者的看法:对全国医生调查开放式问题的答复","authors":"Lisa I. Iezzoni MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For over 50 years, federal disability civil rights laws have mandated that patients with disability receive equitable health care. However, disabled patients continue to experience health care disparities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore physicians’ views, in their own words, about caring for patients with disability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Review of responses to open-ended question at the end of a nationally representative survey of 714 outpatient physicians about their experiences caring for adult disabled patients. The open-ended question asked for additional comments participants wanted to share. Only 108 (15.1 %) survey participants provided responses suitable for analysis (e.g., legible, complete thought). All issues reported here reflect comments from ≥5 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Common concerns involved high costs, too little time, insufficient space, inadequate training, and lack of adequate mental health services to care for disabled patients. Many physicians appeared frustrated by legal requirements that they cover accommodation costs. Multiple physicians described as “unfair” having to pay for sign language interpreters, especially since interpreter costs generally exceed reimbursements for patients’ visits. Physicians also commented on high costs and space demands of accessible exam tables, especially for small practices, and on challenges accommodating patients with severe obesity, including concerns that patients with severe obesity could damage their exam tables. Some participants suggested that disabled patients require advocates to get good quality care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Albeit limited by the small number of responses, these open-ended comments from our nationwide survey of physicians suggest some doctors view certain accessibility requirements as unfair to them or infeasible in their practice environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 101635"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What some physicians say about caring for patients with disability: Responses to open-ended question to nationwide physician survey\",\"authors\":\"Lisa I. Iezzoni MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For over 50 years, federal disability civil rights laws have mandated that patients with disability receive equitable health care. However, disabled patients continue to experience health care disparities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore physicians’ views, in their own words, about caring for patients with disability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Review of responses to open-ended question at the end of a nationally representative survey of 714 outpatient physicians about their experiences caring for adult disabled patients. The open-ended question asked for additional comments participants wanted to share. Only 108 (15.1 %) survey participants provided responses suitable for analysis (e.g., legible, complete thought). All issues reported here reflect comments from ≥5 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Common concerns involved high costs, too little time, insufficient space, inadequate training, and lack of adequate mental health services to care for disabled patients. Many physicians appeared frustrated by legal requirements that they cover accommodation costs. Multiple physicians described as “unfair” having to pay for sign language interpreters, especially since interpreter costs generally exceed reimbursements for patients’ visits. Physicians also commented on high costs and space demands of accessible exam tables, especially for small practices, and on challenges accommodating patients with severe obesity, including concerns that patients with severe obesity could damage their exam tables. Some participants suggested that disabled patients require advocates to get good quality care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Albeit limited by the small number of responses, these open-ended comments from our nationwide survey of physicians suggest some doctors view certain accessibility requirements as unfair to them or infeasible in their practice environments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657424000669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657424000669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
What some physicians say about caring for patients with disability: Responses to open-ended question to nationwide physician survey
Background
For over 50 years, federal disability civil rights laws have mandated that patients with disability receive equitable health care. However, disabled patients continue to experience health care disparities.
Objective
To explore physicians’ views, in their own words, about caring for patients with disability.
Methods
Review of responses to open-ended question at the end of a nationally representative survey of 714 outpatient physicians about their experiences caring for adult disabled patients. The open-ended question asked for additional comments participants wanted to share. Only 108 (15.1 %) survey participants provided responses suitable for analysis (e.g., legible, complete thought). All issues reported here reflect comments from ≥5 participants.
Results
Common concerns involved high costs, too little time, insufficient space, inadequate training, and lack of adequate mental health services to care for disabled patients. Many physicians appeared frustrated by legal requirements that they cover accommodation costs. Multiple physicians described as “unfair” having to pay for sign language interpreters, especially since interpreter costs generally exceed reimbursements for patients’ visits. Physicians also commented on high costs and space demands of accessible exam tables, especially for small practices, and on challenges accommodating patients with severe obesity, including concerns that patients with severe obesity could damage their exam tables. Some participants suggested that disabled patients require advocates to get good quality care.
Conclusions
Albeit limited by the small number of responses, these open-ended comments from our nationwide survey of physicians suggest some doctors view certain accessibility requirements as unfair to them or infeasible in their practice environments.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include:
• Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health
• Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature
• Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs
• Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.