一些医生对照顾残疾患者的看法:对全国医生调查开放式问题的答复

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Disability and Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101635
Lisa I. Iezzoni MD, MSc
{"title":"一些医生对照顾残疾患者的看法:对全国医生调查开放式问题的答复","authors":"Lisa I. Iezzoni MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For over 50 years, federal disability civil rights laws have mandated that patients with disability receive equitable health care. However, disabled patients continue to experience health care disparities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore physicians’ views, in their own words, about caring for patients with disability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Review of responses to open-ended question at the end of a nationally representative survey of 714 outpatient physicians about their experiences caring for adult disabled patients. The open-ended question asked for additional comments participants wanted to share. Only 108 (15.1 %) survey participants provided responses suitable for analysis (e.g., legible, complete thought). All issues reported here reflect comments from ≥5 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Common concerns involved high costs, too little time, insufficient space, inadequate training, and lack of adequate mental health services to care for disabled patients. Many physicians appeared frustrated by legal requirements that they cover accommodation costs. Multiple physicians described as “unfair” having to pay for sign language interpreters, especially since interpreter costs generally exceed reimbursements for patients’ visits. Physicians also commented on high costs and space demands of accessible exam tables, especially for small practices, and on challenges accommodating patients with severe obesity, including concerns that patients with severe obesity could damage their exam tables. Some participants suggested that disabled patients require advocates to get good quality care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Albeit limited by the small number of responses, these open-ended comments from our nationwide survey of physicians suggest some doctors view certain accessibility requirements as unfair to them or infeasible in their practice environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What some physicians say about caring for patients with disability: Responses to open-ended question to nationwide physician survey\",\"authors\":\"Lisa I. Iezzoni MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>For over 50 years, federal disability civil rights laws have mandated that patients with disability receive equitable health care. However, disabled patients continue to experience health care disparities.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To explore physicians’ views, in their own words, about caring for patients with disability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Review of responses to open-ended question at the end of a nationally representative survey of 714 outpatient physicians about their experiences caring for adult disabled patients. The open-ended question asked for additional comments participants wanted to share. Only 108 (15.1 %) survey participants provided responses suitable for analysis (e.g., legible, complete thought). All issues reported here reflect comments from ≥5 participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Common concerns involved high costs, too little time, insufficient space, inadequate training, and lack of adequate mental health services to care for disabled patients. Many physicians appeared frustrated by legal requirements that they cover accommodation costs. Multiple physicians described as “unfair” having to pay for sign language interpreters, especially since interpreter costs generally exceed reimbursements for patients’ visits. Physicians also commented on high costs and space demands of accessible exam tables, especially for small practices, and on challenges accommodating patients with severe obesity, including concerns that patients with severe obesity could damage their exam tables. Some participants suggested that disabled patients require advocates to get good quality care.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Albeit limited by the small number of responses, these open-ended comments from our nationwide survey of physicians suggest some doctors view certain accessibility requirements as unfair to them or infeasible in their practice environments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657424000669\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657424000669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景50多年来,联邦残疾民权法规定残疾患者必须获得公平的医疗服务。方法在对 714 名门诊医生进行的一项具有全国代表性的调查中,回顾了他们对开放式问题的回答,该问题是关于他们护理成年残疾病人的经验。开放式问题询问了参与者希望分享的其他意见。只有 108 位(15.1%)调查参与者提供了适合分析的回答(例如,字迹清晰、想法完整)。这里报告的所有问题都反映了≥5 位参与者的意见。结果 常见的问题包括成本高、时间太少、空间不足、培训不足以及缺乏足够的心理健康服务来照顾残障患者。许多医生对要求他们支付住宿费用的法律规定感到沮丧。多名医生认为,必须支付手语翻译费用是 "不公平的",尤其是翻译费用通常超过了患者的就诊报销额度。医生们还对无障碍检查台的高成本和空间需求发表了意见,尤其是对小诊所而言,并对为严重肥胖患者提供便利所面临的挑战发表了意见,包括担心严重肥胖患者会损坏检查台。结论尽管受限于回复数量较少,但我们在全国范围内对医生进行调查后得出的这些开放式评论表明,一些医生认为某些无障碍要求对他们不公平,或者在他们的执业环境中不可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What some physicians say about caring for patients with disability: Responses to open-ended question to nationwide physician survey

Background

For over 50 years, federal disability civil rights laws have mandated that patients with disability receive equitable health care. However, disabled patients continue to experience health care disparities.

Objective

To explore physicians’ views, in their own words, about caring for patients with disability.

Methods

Review of responses to open-ended question at the end of a nationally representative survey of 714 outpatient physicians about their experiences caring for adult disabled patients. The open-ended question asked for additional comments participants wanted to share. Only 108 (15.1 %) survey participants provided responses suitable for analysis (e.g., legible, complete thought). All issues reported here reflect comments from ≥5 participants.

Results

Common concerns involved high costs, too little time, insufficient space, inadequate training, and lack of adequate mental health services to care for disabled patients. Many physicians appeared frustrated by legal requirements that they cover accommodation costs. Multiple physicians described as “unfair” having to pay for sign language interpreters, especially since interpreter costs generally exceed reimbursements for patients’ visits. Physicians also commented on high costs and space demands of accessible exam tables, especially for small practices, and on challenges accommodating patients with severe obesity, including concerns that patients with severe obesity could damage their exam tables. Some participants suggested that disabled patients require advocates to get good quality care.

Conclusions

Albeit limited by the small number of responses, these open-ended comments from our nationwide survey of physicians suggest some doctors view certain accessibility requirements as unfair to them or infeasible in their practice environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
期刊最新文献
Physical activity as a mediator in the relationship between health locus of control and health-related quality of life in multiple sclerosis patients with different disease duration. Covid-19 Pandemic's impact on socio-emotional problems experienced by victims of violence with disabilities. Racial-ethnic differences in the associations between functional disabilities and subsequent depression among community-dwelling midlife and older adults in the US. Transportation for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Home- and Community-Based Services. School-based factors influencing physical activity participation in children and adolescents with disabilities: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1