利用 3D U-Net 设计和评估基于深度学习的上下颌骨下结构自动分割系统

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100780
L. Melerowitz , S. Sreenivasa , M. Nachbar , A. Stsefanenka , M. Beck , C. Senger , N. Predescu , S. Ullah Akram , V. Budach , D. Zips , M. Heiland , S. Nahles , C. Stromberger
{"title":"利用 3D U-Net 设计和评估基于深度学习的上下颌骨下结构自动分割系统","authors":"L. Melerowitz ,&nbsp;S. Sreenivasa ,&nbsp;M. Nachbar ,&nbsp;A. Stsefanenka ,&nbsp;M. Beck ,&nbsp;C. Senger ,&nbsp;N. Predescu ,&nbsp;S. Ullah Akram ,&nbsp;V. Budach ,&nbsp;D. Zips ,&nbsp;M. Heiland ,&nbsp;S. Nahles ,&nbsp;C. Stromberger","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current segmentation approaches for radiation treatment planning in head and neck cancer patients (HNCP) typically consider the entire mandible as an organ at risk, whereas segmentation of the maxilla remains uncommon. Accurate risk assessment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) or implant-based dental rehabilitation after radiation therapy may require a nuanced analysis of dose distribution in specific mandibular and maxillary segments. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and inconsistent, and there is no definition of jaw subsections.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The mandible and maxilla were divided into 12 substructures. The model was developed from 82 computed tomography (CT) scans of HNCP and adopts an encoder-decoder three-dimensional (3D) U-Net structure. The efficiency and accuracy of the automated method were compared against manual segmentation on an additional set of 20 independent CT scans. The evaluation metrics used were the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and surface DSC (sDSC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Automated segmentations were performed in a median of 86 s, compared to manual segmentations, which took a median of 53.5 min. The median DSC per substructure ranged from 0.81 to 0.91, and the median HD95 ranged from 1.61 to 4.22. The number of artifacts did not affect these scores. The maxillary substructures showed lower metrics than the mandibular substructures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The jaw substructure segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, time efficiency, and promising results in CT scans with and without metal artifacts. This novel model could provide further investigation into dose relationships with ORN or dental implant failure in normal tissue complication prediction models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000570/pdfft?md5=d76ae4c5033a1b5a71b961c2af0f93cb&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000570-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and evaluation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation of maxillary and mandibular substructures using a 3D U-Net\",\"authors\":\"L. Melerowitz ,&nbsp;S. Sreenivasa ,&nbsp;M. Nachbar ,&nbsp;A. Stsefanenka ,&nbsp;M. Beck ,&nbsp;C. Senger ,&nbsp;N. Predescu ,&nbsp;S. Ullah Akram ,&nbsp;V. Budach ,&nbsp;D. Zips ,&nbsp;M. Heiland ,&nbsp;S. Nahles ,&nbsp;C. Stromberger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Current segmentation approaches for radiation treatment planning in head and neck cancer patients (HNCP) typically consider the entire mandible as an organ at risk, whereas segmentation of the maxilla remains uncommon. Accurate risk assessment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) or implant-based dental rehabilitation after radiation therapy may require a nuanced analysis of dose distribution in specific mandibular and maxillary segments. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and inconsistent, and there is no definition of jaw subsections.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The mandible and maxilla were divided into 12 substructures. The model was developed from 82 computed tomography (CT) scans of HNCP and adopts an encoder-decoder three-dimensional (3D) U-Net structure. The efficiency and accuracy of the automated method were compared against manual segmentation on an additional set of 20 independent CT scans. The evaluation metrics used were the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and surface DSC (sDSC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Automated segmentations were performed in a median of 86 s, compared to manual segmentations, which took a median of 53.5 min. The median DSC per substructure ranged from 0.81 to 0.91, and the median HD95 ranged from 1.61 to 4.22. The number of artifacts did not affect these scores. The maxillary substructures showed lower metrics than the mandibular substructures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The jaw substructure segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, time efficiency, and promising results in CT scans with and without metal artifacts. This novel model could provide further investigation into dose relationships with ORN or dental implant failure in normal tissue complication prediction models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000570/pdfft?md5=d76ae4c5033a1b5a71b961c2af0f93cb&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000570-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000570\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景目前头颈部癌症患者(HNCP)放射治疗计划的分割方法通常将整个下颌骨视为风险器官,而上颌骨的分割仍不常见。要对放疗后的骨软化症(ORN)或种植牙康复进行准确的风险评估,可能需要对特定下颌骨和上颌骨节段的剂量分布进行细致分析。手动分割既费时又不一致,而且没有颌骨分段的定义。该模型是根据 82 例 HNCP 计算机断层扫描(CT)结果建立的,采用了编码器-解码器三维(3D)U-网络结构。在另外一组 20 个独立的 CT 扫描图像上,将自动方法的效率和准确性与人工分割进行了比较。使用的评估指标包括 Dice 相似性系数 (DSC)、95% Hausdorff 距离 (HD95) 和表面 DSC (sDSC)。每个子结构的 DSC 中位数从 0.81 到 0.91 不等,HD95 中位数从 1.61 到 4.22 不等。伪影的数量并不影响这些分数。结论在有金属伪影和无金属伪影的 CT 扫描中,颌骨下部结构分割显示出较高的准确性、时间效率和良好的效果。这种新型模型可进一步研究正常组织并发症预测模型中剂量与 ORN 或牙科种植失败的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Design and evaluation of a deep learning-based automatic segmentation of maxillary and mandibular substructures using a 3D U-Net

Background

Current segmentation approaches for radiation treatment planning in head and neck cancer patients (HNCP) typically consider the entire mandible as an organ at risk, whereas segmentation of the maxilla remains uncommon. Accurate risk assessment for osteoradionecrosis (ORN) or implant-based dental rehabilitation after radiation therapy may require a nuanced analysis of dose distribution in specific mandibular and maxillary segments. Manual segmentation is time-consuming and inconsistent, and there is no definition of jaw subsections.

Materials and methods

The mandible and maxilla were divided into 12 substructures. The model was developed from 82 computed tomography (CT) scans of HNCP and adopts an encoder-decoder three-dimensional (3D) U-Net structure. The efficiency and accuracy of the automated method were compared against manual segmentation on an additional set of 20 independent CT scans. The evaluation metrics used were the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and surface DSC (sDSC).

Results

Automated segmentations were performed in a median of 86 s, compared to manual segmentations, which took a median of 53.5 min. The median DSC per substructure ranged from 0.81 to 0.91, and the median HD95 ranged from 1.61 to 4.22. The number of artifacts did not affect these scores. The maxillary substructures showed lower metrics than the mandibular substructures.

Conclusions

The jaw substructure segmentation demonstrated high accuracy, time efficiency, and promising results in CT scans with and without metal artifacts. This novel model could provide further investigation into dose relationships with ORN or dental implant failure in normal tissue complication prediction models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and safety of single-fraction sub-ablative radiotherapy with systemic therapy in colorectal cancer patients with ≤ 10 metastases: A multicenter pilot study (NCT05375708) Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how Reirradiation − still navigating uncharted waters? The impact of rectal spacers in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy Maximum disease diameter is associated with outcomes in stage II follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy alone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1