创世记》第 34 章与律法

William A. Tooman
{"title":"创世记》第 34 章与律法","authors":"William A. Tooman","doi":"10.1353/cbq.2024.a924362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Two features of the Shechem story present challenges for reading: the story’s ambiguities and its relationship to the law. The two features are mutually implicating. Through their words and their actions, particular characters allude to particular laws, revealing that they hold divergent points of view on the crisis instigated by Prince Shechem. Disclosing this conflict of perspectives clarifies many of the story’s ambiguities and maximizes others. In this way, Genesis 34 reveals itself as a legal riddle. All the legal actions proposed and taken by different characters correspond with biblical laws, but all are wrongly applied. One possibility after another is tested and discarded, until all the options are discounted.","PeriodicalId":424111,"journal":{"name":"The Catholic Biblical Quarterly","volume":"282 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genesis 34 and the Law\",\"authors\":\"William A. Tooman\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cbq.2024.a924362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Two features of the Shechem story present challenges for reading: the story’s ambiguities and its relationship to the law. The two features are mutually implicating. Through their words and their actions, particular characters allude to particular laws, revealing that they hold divergent points of view on the crisis instigated by Prince Shechem. Disclosing this conflict of perspectives clarifies many of the story’s ambiguities and maximizes others. In this way, Genesis 34 reveals itself as a legal riddle. All the legal actions proposed and taken by different characters correspond with biblical laws, but all are wrongly applied. One possibility after another is tested and discarded, until all the options are discounted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Catholic Biblical Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"282 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Catholic Biblical Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2024.a924362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Catholic Biblical Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2024.a924362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:《示剑》故事的两个特点给阅读带来了挑战:故事的模糊性及其与法律的关系。这两个特点相互牵连。通过他们的言行,特定的人物暗指特定的法律,揭示了他们对于示剑王子挑起的危机持有不同的观点。这种观点冲突的揭示澄清了故事中的许多含糊之处,同时也最大限度地扩大了其他含糊之处。这样,《创世纪》第 34 章就像一个法律谜语。不同人物提出和采取的所有法律行动都符合《圣经》中的律法,但都被错误地应用了。一个又一个可能性被检验和抛弃,直到所有选项都被否定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genesis 34 and the Law
Abstract: Two features of the Shechem story present challenges for reading: the story’s ambiguities and its relationship to the law. The two features are mutually implicating. Through their words and their actions, particular characters allude to particular laws, revealing that they hold divergent points of view on the crisis instigated by Prince Shechem. Disclosing this conflict of perspectives clarifies many of the story’s ambiguities and maximizes others. In this way, Genesis 34 reveals itself as a legal riddle. All the legal actions proposed and taken by different characters correspond with biblical laws, but all are wrongly applied. One possibility after another is tested and discarded, until all the options are discounted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Theology of Sacrifice as Gift in Ben Sira Murmuring against Moses: The Contentious History and Contested Future of Pentateuchal Studies by John S. Bergsma and Jeffrey L. Morrow (review) Explanations for Exile in Amos by Martha Campos (review) The Riddle of Mark 7:15 Elijah and Elisha in the Signs of the Gospel of John: Assessing Prophetic Christologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1