使用不同固位材料的定位器固位的下颌种植体覆盖义齿种植体周围骨水平的比较:回顾性研究

Mohamed Said
{"title":"使用不同固位材料的定位器固位的下颌种植体覆盖义齿种植体周围骨水平的比较:回顾性研究","authors":"Mohamed Said","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.270724.2949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare the effect of nylon versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) retentive insert of locator attachments on peri-implant bone loss in mandibular implant overdenture. Materials and methods: Completely edentulous patients, with two implants locator attachment for mandibular overdenture were recalled for this study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I: overdenture retained by locator attachment using nylon retentive male insert, and Group II: overdenture retained by locator attachment with PEEK retentive male insert. Digital periapical radiographs were conducted to capture images of dental implants using a long-cone paralleling technique. Images taken immediately (baseline) and 24 months after loading were used for this study to measure the vertical bone loss (VBL) and horizontal bone loss (HBL). It was considered statistically significant when P value was less than 0.05. Results: Twenty-four dental implants were placed in twelve patients aged between 52 and 65 years, comprising 7 men and 5 women. There were no instances of implant loss in either group from the time of placement through prosthetic delivery up to the two-year follow-up period. Group I recorded significant lower VBL than Group II after 24 months of loading (P < 0.05). On the other hand, there was no significant differences in HBL between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Implant overdentures retained by PEEK insert did cause more peri-implant bone loss when compared to those retained with nylon inserts; however further studies are needed to validate these results.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of peri-implant bone level in mandibular implant overdenture retained by locator attachment with varying retentive insert materials: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Said\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/edj.2024.270724.2949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To compare the effect of nylon versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) retentive insert of locator attachments on peri-implant bone loss in mandibular implant overdenture. Materials and methods: Completely edentulous patients, with two implants locator attachment for mandibular overdenture were recalled for this study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I: overdenture retained by locator attachment using nylon retentive male insert, and Group II: overdenture retained by locator attachment with PEEK retentive male insert. Digital periapical radiographs were conducted to capture images of dental implants using a long-cone paralleling technique. Images taken immediately (baseline) and 24 months after loading were used for this study to measure the vertical bone loss (VBL) and horizontal bone loss (HBL). It was considered statistically significant when P value was less than 0.05. Results: Twenty-four dental implants were placed in twelve patients aged between 52 and 65 years, comprising 7 men and 5 women. There were no instances of implant loss in either group from the time of placement through prosthetic delivery up to the two-year follow-up period. Group I recorded significant lower VBL than Group II after 24 months of loading (P < 0.05). On the other hand, there was no significant differences in HBL between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Implant overdentures retained by PEEK insert did cause more peri-implant bone loss when compared to those retained with nylon inserts; however further studies are needed to validate these results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian dental journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.270724.2949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.270724.2949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较尼龙和聚醚醚酮(PEEK)固位连接体对下颌种植体覆盖义齿种植体周围骨质流失的影响。材料和方法:本研究召回了下颌覆盖义齿的完全无牙颌患者,他们都有两个种植体定位附件。患者分为两组:第一组:使用尼龙固位公插件,通过定位器固位的覆盖义齿;第二组:使用PEEK固位公插件,通过定位器固位的覆盖义齿。采用长锥体平行技术拍摄数字根尖周X光片,以捕捉牙科植入物的图像。在本研究中,使用了植入后即刻(基线)和 24 个月的图像来测量垂直骨质流失(VBL)和水平骨质流失(HBL)。当 P 值小于 0.05 时,即认为具有统计学意义。结果12 名年龄在 52 岁至 65 岁之间的患者共植入了 24 个种植体,其中男性 7 人,女性 5 人。从种植体植入到修复体交付,直至两年的随访期间,两组患者均未出现种植体脱落的情况。第一组在植入 24 个月后的 VBL 值明显低于第二组(P < 0.05)。另一方面,两组的 HBL 没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。结论与使用尼龙内衬的种植体相比,使用PEEK内衬固位的种植体覆盖义齿确实会造成更多的种植体周围骨质流失;但是还需要进一步的研究来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of peri-implant bone level in mandibular implant overdenture retained by locator attachment with varying retentive insert materials: A retrospective study
Aim: To compare the effect of nylon versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) retentive insert of locator attachments on peri-implant bone loss in mandibular implant overdenture. Materials and methods: Completely edentulous patients, with two implants locator attachment for mandibular overdenture were recalled for this study. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I: overdenture retained by locator attachment using nylon retentive male insert, and Group II: overdenture retained by locator attachment with PEEK retentive male insert. Digital periapical radiographs were conducted to capture images of dental implants using a long-cone paralleling technique. Images taken immediately (baseline) and 24 months after loading were used for this study to measure the vertical bone loss (VBL) and horizontal bone loss (HBL). It was considered statistically significant when P value was less than 0.05. Results: Twenty-four dental implants were placed in twelve patients aged between 52 and 65 years, comprising 7 men and 5 women. There were no instances of implant loss in either group from the time of placement through prosthetic delivery up to the two-year follow-up period. Group I recorded significant lower VBL than Group II after 24 months of loading (P < 0.05). On the other hand, there was no significant differences in HBL between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Implant overdentures retained by PEEK insert did cause more peri-implant bone loss when compared to those retained with nylon inserts; however further studies are needed to validate these results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness Of Smartphone Application In Improving Oral Hygiene Compared To Oral Instructions In Patients With Plaque-induced Gingivitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Histopathological Evaluation of Cholecalciferol Overdose on Tongue Structure of Albino Rats (Immunohistochemical Study) EFFECT OF EXTERNAL COLD AND VIBRATION (BUZZY DEVICE) VERSUS THE CONVENTIONAL INJECTION TECHNIQUE ON PAIN PERCEPTION DURING LOCAL ANESTHESIA ADMINSTRATION IN CHILDREN: A SPLIT-MOUTH RANDOMIZED CLINICALTRIAL STUDY Effect of Different In-Office Bleaching techniques on Enamel Color and Surface Roughness: In Vitro Study SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND COLOR STABILITY OF MILLED VERSUS 3D PRINTED INTERIM RESTORATION AFTER IMMERSION IN TWO PH MEDIA (IN VITRO STUDY)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1