急性无并发症 B 型硬膜外血肿最佳药物治疗的风险分层。

Kelvin Jeason Yang , Huey-Shiuan Kuo , Nai-Hsin Chi , Hsi-Yu Yu , Shoei-Shen Wang , I-Hui Wu
{"title":"急性无并发症 B 型硬膜外血肿最佳药物治疗的风险分层。","authors":"Kelvin Jeason Yang ,&nbsp;Huey-Shiuan Kuo ,&nbsp;Nai-Hsin Chi ,&nbsp;Hsi-Yu Yu ,&nbsp;Shoei-Shen Wang ,&nbsp;I-Hui Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Best medical therapy (BMT) for acute uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma (TBIMH) is the current treatment guideline, but there is considerable controversy about subsequent clinical course and outcome, which may be associated with a significant failure rate. The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors for BMT failure and to develop a risk score to guide clinical decision making.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with acute uncomplicated TBIMH between 2011 January and 2020 December were retrospectively studied. Logistic regression was applied to univariately assess potential risk predictors, and multivariable model results were then used to formulate a simplified predictive model for BMT failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In a total of 61 patients, the overall rate of BMT failure was 57.4% (35/61), of which 48.6% (17/35) occurred within 28 days of onset. Logistic regression identified maximum descending aortic diameter (HR ​= ​1.99 CI ​= ​1.16–3.40, p ​= ​0.012), initial IMH thickness (HR ​= ​3.29, CI ​= ​1.28–8.46, p ​= ​0.013) and presence of focal contrast enhancement (HR ​= ​3.12, CI ​= ​1.49–6.54, p ​= ​0.003) as potential risk predictors of BMT failure. A risk score was calculated as follows: [Max DTA diameter (mm)∗0.6876 ​+ ​Max IMH thickness (mm)∗1.1918 ​+ ​PAU/ULP ∗1.1369]. Freedom from BMT failure at 1 year was 72% in patients with a risk score ​&lt; ​4.12, compared with only 35.1% in those with a risk score ​≧ ​4.12.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a substantial proportion of patients with acute uncomplicated TBIMH, initial BMT failed. Based on the three initial computed tomographic imaging variables, this risk score could help stratify patients at high or low risk for BMT failure and provided additional information for early intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages e148-e154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk stratification of best medical therapy for acute uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma\",\"authors\":\"Kelvin Jeason Yang ,&nbsp;Huey-Shiuan Kuo ,&nbsp;Nai-Hsin Chi ,&nbsp;Hsi-Yu Yu ,&nbsp;Shoei-Shen Wang ,&nbsp;I-Hui Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2024.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Best medical therapy (BMT) for acute uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma (TBIMH) is the current treatment guideline, but there is considerable controversy about subsequent clinical course and outcome, which may be associated with a significant failure rate. The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors for BMT failure and to develop a risk score to guide clinical decision making.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients with acute uncomplicated TBIMH between 2011 January and 2020 December were retrospectively studied. Logistic regression was applied to univariately assess potential risk predictors, and multivariable model results were then used to formulate a simplified predictive model for BMT failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In a total of 61 patients, the overall rate of BMT failure was 57.4% (35/61), of which 48.6% (17/35) occurred within 28 days of onset. Logistic regression identified maximum descending aortic diameter (HR ​= ​1.99 CI ​= ​1.16–3.40, p ​= ​0.012), initial IMH thickness (HR ​= ​3.29, CI ​= ​1.28–8.46, p ​= ​0.013) and presence of focal contrast enhancement (HR ​= ​3.12, CI ​= ​1.49–6.54, p ​= ​0.003) as potential risk predictors of BMT failure. A risk score was calculated as follows: [Max DTA diameter (mm)∗0.6876 ​+ ​Max IMH thickness (mm)∗1.1918 ​+ ​PAU/ULP ∗1.1369]. Freedom from BMT failure at 1 year was 72% in patients with a risk score ​&lt; ​4.12, compared with only 35.1% in those with a risk score ​≧ ​4.12.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In a substantial proportion of patients with acute uncomplicated TBIMH, initial BMT failed. Based on the three initial computed tomographic imaging variables, this risk score could help stratify patients at high or low risk for BMT failure and provided additional information for early intervention.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages e148-e154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479666X24000362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的急性无并发症 B 型硬膜外血肿(TBIMH)的最佳药物治疗(BMT)是目前的治疗指南,但对后续临床过程和结果存在相当大的争议,这可能与显著的失败率有关。本研究旨在确定 BMT 失败的潜在风险因素,并制定一个风险评分来指导临床决策。方法回顾性研究了 2011 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间急性无并发症 TBIMH 患者。结果在61名患者中,BMT失败的总比率为57.4%(35/61),其中48.6%(17/35)发生在发病28天内。逻辑回归确定降主动脉最大直径(HR = 1.99 CI = 1.16-3.40,P = 0.012)、初始 IMH 厚度(HR = 3.29,CI = 1.28-8.46,P = 0.013)和局灶造影剂增强(HR = 3.12,CI = 1.49-6.54,P = 0.003)为 BMT 失败的潜在风险预测因素。风险评分计算如下[最大 DTA 直径(毫米)∗0.6876 + 最大 IMH 厚度(毫米)∗1.1918 + PAU/ULP ∗1.1369]。风险评分< 4.12的患者1年内免于BMT失败的比例为72%,而风险评分≧ 4.12的患者仅为35.1%。基于三个初始计算机断层扫描成像变量,该风险评分可帮助对 BMT 失败的高风险或低风险患者进行分层,并为早期干预提供额外信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk stratification of best medical therapy for acute uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma

Objectives

Best medical therapy (BMT) for acute uncomplicated type B intramural hematoma (TBIMH) is the current treatment guideline, but there is considerable controversy about subsequent clinical course and outcome, which may be associated with a significant failure rate. The purpose of this study was to identify potential risk factors for BMT failure and to develop a risk score to guide clinical decision making.

Methods

Patients with acute uncomplicated TBIMH between 2011 January and 2020 December were retrospectively studied. Logistic regression was applied to univariately assess potential risk predictors, and multivariable model results were then used to formulate a simplified predictive model for BMT failure.

Results

In a total of 61 patients, the overall rate of BMT failure was 57.4% (35/61), of which 48.6% (17/35) occurred within 28 days of onset. Logistic regression identified maximum descending aortic diameter (HR ​= ​1.99 CI ​= ​1.16–3.40, p ​= ​0.012), initial IMH thickness (HR ​= ​3.29, CI ​= ​1.28–8.46, p ​= ​0.013) and presence of focal contrast enhancement (HR ​= ​3.12, CI ​= ​1.49–6.54, p ​= ​0.003) as potential risk predictors of BMT failure. A risk score was calculated as follows: [Max DTA diameter (mm)∗0.6876 ​+ ​Max IMH thickness (mm)∗1.1918 ​+ ​PAU/ULP ∗1.1369]. Freedom from BMT failure at 1 year was 72% in patients with a risk score ​< ​4.12, compared with only 35.1% in those with a risk score ​≧ ​4.12.

Conclusions

In a substantial proportion of patients with acute uncomplicated TBIMH, initial BMT failed. Based on the three initial computed tomographic imaging variables, this risk score could help stratify patients at high or low risk for BMT failure and provided additional information for early intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
期刊最新文献
Enhancements in artificial intelligence for medical examinations: A leap from ChatGPT 3.5 to ChatGPT 4.0 in the FRCS trauma & orthopaedics examination. A boost to concentration or a distracting noise? A systematic review of surgeon and anaesthetist perspectives of the benefit of intra-operative music. List of editors Surgeon ability to predict physical activity and sedentary time: Comparison of self-reported and measured activity Sensitivity and specificity of surgeons' intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1