Liam Butler PhD , Alexander Ivanov MD , Turgay Celik MD , Ibrahim Karabayir PhD , Lokesh Chinthala MS , Melissa M. Hudson MD , Kiri K. Ness PhD , Daniel A. Mulrooney MD, MS , Stephanie B. Dixon MD, MPH , Mohammad S. Tootooni PhD , Adam J. Doerr MD , Byron C. Jaeger PhD , Robert L. Davis MD, MPH , David D. McManus MD, ScM , David Herrington MD, MHS , Oguz Akbilgic DBA, PhD
{"title":"使用 Apple Watch 心电图远程监测致命冠心病的可行性","authors":"Liam Butler PhD , Alexander Ivanov MD , Turgay Celik MD , Ibrahim Karabayir PhD , Lokesh Chinthala MS , Melissa M. Hudson MD , Kiri K. Ness PhD , Daniel A. Mulrooney MD, MS , Stephanie B. Dixon MD, MPH , Mohammad S. Tootooni PhD , Adam J. Doerr MD , Byron C. Jaeger PhD , Robert L. Davis MD, MPH , David D. McManus MD, ScM , David Herrington MD, MHS , Oguz Akbilgic DBA, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fatal coronary heart disease (FCHD) is often described as sudden cardiac death (affects >4 million people/year), where coronary artery disease is the only identified condition. Electrocardiographic artificial intelligence (ECG-AI) models for FCHD risk prediction using ECG data from wearable devices could enable wider screening/monitoring efforts.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To develop a single-lead ECG–based deep learning model for FCHD risk prediction and assess concordance between clinical and Apple Watch ECGs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An FCHD single-lead (“lead I” from 12-lead ECGs) ECG-AI model was developed using 167,662 ECGs (50,132 patients) from the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center. Eighty percent of the data (5-fold cross-validation) was used for training and 20% as a holdout. Cox proportional hazards (CPH) models incorporating ECG-AI predictions with age, sex, and race were also developed. The models were tested on paired clinical single-lead and Apple Watch ECGs from 243 St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study participants. The correlation and concordance of the predictions were assessed using Pearson correlation (R), Spearman correlation (ρ), and Cohen’s kappa.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ECG-AI and CPH models resulted in AUC = 0.76 and 0.79, respectively, on the 20% holdout and AUC = 0.85 and 0.87 on the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist external validation data. There was moderate-strong positive correlation between predictions (R = 0.74, ρ = 0.67, and κ = 0.58) when tested on the 243 paired ECGs. The clinical (lead I) and Apple Watch predictions led to the same low/high-risk FCHD classification for 99% of the participants. CPH prediction correlation resulted in an R = 0.81, ρ = 0.76, and κ = 0.78.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Risk of FCHD can be predicted from single-lead ECGs obtained from wearable devices and are statistically concordant with lead I of a 12-lead ECG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 115-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000306/pdfft?md5=75e33d0289fa6cf13b0db8075297b6a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693624000306-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of remote monitoring for fatal coronary heart disease using Apple Watch ECGs\",\"authors\":\"Liam Butler PhD , Alexander Ivanov MD , Turgay Celik MD , Ibrahim Karabayir PhD , Lokesh Chinthala MS , Melissa M. Hudson MD , Kiri K. Ness PhD , Daniel A. Mulrooney MD, MS , Stephanie B. Dixon MD, MPH , Mohammad S. Tootooni PhD , Adam J. Doerr MD , Byron C. Jaeger PhD , Robert L. Davis MD, MPH , David D. McManus MD, ScM , David Herrington MD, MHS , Oguz Akbilgic DBA, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2024.03.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Fatal coronary heart disease (FCHD) is often described as sudden cardiac death (affects >4 million people/year), where coronary artery disease is the only identified condition. Electrocardiographic artificial intelligence (ECG-AI) models for FCHD risk prediction using ECG data from wearable devices could enable wider screening/monitoring efforts.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To develop a single-lead ECG–based deep learning model for FCHD risk prediction and assess concordance between clinical and Apple Watch ECGs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An FCHD single-lead (“lead I” from 12-lead ECGs) ECG-AI model was developed using 167,662 ECGs (50,132 patients) from the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center. Eighty percent of the data (5-fold cross-validation) was used for training and 20% as a holdout. Cox proportional hazards (CPH) models incorporating ECG-AI predictions with age, sex, and race were also developed. The models were tested on paired clinical single-lead and Apple Watch ECGs from 243 St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study participants. The correlation and concordance of the predictions were assessed using Pearson correlation (R), Spearman correlation (ρ), and Cohen’s kappa.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ECG-AI and CPH models resulted in AUC = 0.76 and 0.79, respectively, on the 20% holdout and AUC = 0.85 and 0.87 on the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist external validation data. There was moderate-strong positive correlation between predictions (R = 0.74, ρ = 0.67, and κ = 0.58) when tested on the 243 paired ECGs. The clinical (lead I) and Apple Watch predictions led to the same low/high-risk FCHD classification for 99% of the participants. CPH prediction correlation resulted in an R = 0.81, ρ = 0.76, and κ = 0.78.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Risk of FCHD can be predicted from single-lead ECGs obtained from wearable devices and are statistically concordant with lead I of a 12-lead ECG.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"5 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 115-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000306/pdfft?md5=75e33d0289fa6cf13b0db8075297b6a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2666693624000306-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693624000306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景致命性冠心病(FCHD)通常被描述为心脏性猝死(每年影响>400万人),其中冠状动脉疾病是唯一确定的疾病。方法利用田纳西大学健康科学中心的167662份心电图(50132名患者)开发了FCHD单导联(12导联心电图中的 "I导联")心电图人工智能模型。其中 80% 的数据(5 倍交叉验证)用于训练,20% 作为保留数据。此外,还开发了将心电图 AI 预测与年龄、性别和种族相结合的 Cox 比例危险(CPH)模型。这些模型在 243 名圣犹达终生队列研究参与者的配对临床单导联和 Apple Watch 心电图上进行了测试。使用皮尔逊相关性(R)、斯皮尔曼相关性(ρ)和科恩卡帕(Cohen's kappa)对预测的相关性和一致性进行了评估。结果ECG-AI和CPH模型在20%保留率数据上的AUC分别为0.76和0.79,在Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist外部验证数据上的AUC分别为0.85和0.87。在 243 张配对心电图上进行测试时,预测结果之间存在中等强度的正相关性(R = 0.74、ρ = 0.67 和 κ = 0.58)。在 99% 的参与者中,临床预测(导联 I)和 Apple Watch 预测得出的 FCHD 低/高风险分类结果相同。CPH 预测相关性的 R = 0.81、ρ = 0.76 和 κ = 0.78。
Feasibility of remote monitoring for fatal coronary heart disease using Apple Watch ECGs
Background
Fatal coronary heart disease (FCHD) is often described as sudden cardiac death (affects >4 million people/year), where coronary artery disease is the only identified condition. Electrocardiographic artificial intelligence (ECG-AI) models for FCHD risk prediction using ECG data from wearable devices could enable wider screening/monitoring efforts.
Objectives
To develop a single-lead ECG–based deep learning model for FCHD risk prediction and assess concordance between clinical and Apple Watch ECGs.
Methods
An FCHD single-lead (“lead I” from 12-lead ECGs) ECG-AI model was developed using 167,662 ECGs (50,132 patients) from the University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center. Eighty percent of the data (5-fold cross-validation) was used for training and 20% as a holdout. Cox proportional hazards (CPH) models incorporating ECG-AI predictions with age, sex, and race were also developed. The models were tested on paired clinical single-lead and Apple Watch ECGs from 243 St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study participants. The correlation and concordance of the predictions were assessed using Pearson correlation (R), Spearman correlation (ρ), and Cohen’s kappa.
Results
The ECG-AI and CPH models resulted in AUC = 0.76 and 0.79, respectively, on the 20% holdout and AUC = 0.85 and 0.87 on the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist external validation data. There was moderate-strong positive correlation between predictions (R = 0.74, ρ = 0.67, and κ = 0.58) when tested on the 243 paired ECGs. The clinical (lead I) and Apple Watch predictions led to the same low/high-risk FCHD classification for 99% of the participants. CPH prediction correlation resulted in an R = 0.81, ρ = 0.76, and κ = 0.78.
Conclusion
Risk of FCHD can be predicted from single-lead ECGs obtained from wearable devices and are statistically concordant with lead I of a 12-lead ECG.