估计饲料中营养成分的变化及其对泌乳奶牛的影响

A.L. Carroll , K.J. Hanford , C. Abney-Schulte , P.J. Kononoff
{"title":"估计饲料中营养成分的变化及其对泌乳奶牛的影响","authors":"A.L. Carroll ,&nbsp;K.J. Hanford ,&nbsp;C. Abney-Schulte ,&nbsp;P.J. Kononoff","doi":"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Diets formulated for dairy cattle are designed to supply nutrients, but rations delivered to the animal may deviate from original formulations, resulting in implications for milk production, composition, and even pregnancy rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospective feed mixing records collected from 8 commercial dairy farms over 52 wk. Farms ranged from 2,982 to 29,783 animals, producing 31.8 ± 5.93 (±SD) kg of milk with 4.14 ± 0.461% fat and 3.26 ± 0.218% protein. Data collected included daily TMR nutrient deviation, calculated as diet nutrient content minus the observed divided by the formulated diet concentrations of CP, fat, NDF, and starch. Data were analyzed with fixed effects of time (modeled as 28-d periods) and days of positive nutrient deviation in fat, CP, NDF, and starch with each nutrient alone and in combination with the other nutrients, random effects of herd, and repeated measure of time within herd. The nutrient deviation by farm averaged (±SD) 1.68 ± 2.655, 2.28 ± 4.473, 1.75 ± 2.621, and 1.47 ± 2.147% for CP, fat, NDF, and starch, respectively. Days of positive nutrient deviation per period averaged (±SD) 25.5 ± 3.47, 25.5 ± 3.72, 25.6 ± 3.49, and 25.9 ± 2.61, respectively. Dry matter intake (DMI; 17.2 ± 1.78 kg/d) decreased with increasing positive deviation days in starch (−0.0483 ± 0.01265) and increased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (0.0211 ± 0.00942). Milk yield (31.4 ± 2.50 kg/d) increased with positive deviation days in starch (0.0486 ± 0.02110) and decreased with increased positive deviation days in NDF (−0.0298 ± 0.02202). Finally, pregnancy rate (21.7 ± 4.34) increased with increasing positive deviation days in fat (0.385 ± 0.1635) and decreased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (−0.420 ± 0.1879). For these models, period significantly affected milk yield but was not observed to affect pregnancy rate and DMI. Results suggest farm and nutrient type were significant sources of variation, and overall, farms overfeed nutrients CP, fat, NDF, and starch 92% of the days of a 28-d period.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94061,"journal":{"name":"JDS communications","volume":"5 6","pages":"Pages 548-552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle\",\"authors\":\"A.L. Carroll ,&nbsp;K.J. Hanford ,&nbsp;C. Abney-Schulte ,&nbsp;P.J. Kononoff\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jdsc.2024-0564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Diets formulated for dairy cattle are designed to supply nutrients, but rations delivered to the animal may deviate from original formulations, resulting in implications for milk production, composition, and even pregnancy rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospective feed mixing records collected from 8 commercial dairy farms over 52 wk. Farms ranged from 2,982 to 29,783 animals, producing 31.8 ± 5.93 (±SD) kg of milk with 4.14 ± 0.461% fat and 3.26 ± 0.218% protein. Data collected included daily TMR nutrient deviation, calculated as diet nutrient content minus the observed divided by the formulated diet concentrations of CP, fat, NDF, and starch. Data were analyzed with fixed effects of time (modeled as 28-d periods) and days of positive nutrient deviation in fat, CP, NDF, and starch with each nutrient alone and in combination with the other nutrients, random effects of herd, and repeated measure of time within herd. The nutrient deviation by farm averaged (±SD) 1.68 ± 2.655, 2.28 ± 4.473, 1.75 ± 2.621, and 1.47 ± 2.147% for CP, fat, NDF, and starch, respectively. Days of positive nutrient deviation per period averaged (±SD) 25.5 ± 3.47, 25.5 ± 3.72, 25.6 ± 3.49, and 25.9 ± 2.61, respectively. Dry matter intake (DMI; 17.2 ± 1.78 kg/d) decreased with increasing positive deviation days in starch (−0.0483 ± 0.01265) and increased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (0.0211 ± 0.00942). Milk yield (31.4 ± 2.50 kg/d) increased with positive deviation days in starch (0.0486 ± 0.02110) and decreased with increased positive deviation days in NDF (−0.0298 ± 0.02202). Finally, pregnancy rate (21.7 ± 4.34) increased with increasing positive deviation days in fat (0.385 ± 0.1635) and decreased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (−0.420 ± 0.1879). For these models, period significantly affected milk yield but was not observed to affect pregnancy rate and DMI. Results suggest farm and nutrient type were significant sources of variation, and overall, farms overfeed nutrients CP, fat, NDF, and starch 92% of the days of a 28-d period.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDS communications\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 548-552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDS communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDS communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666910224000760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为奶牛配制的日粮旨在提供营养,但提供给动物的日粮可能会偏离最初的配方,从而对奶牛的产奶量、成分甚至妊娠率产生影响。本研究的目的是评估从 8 个商业奶牛场收集的 52 周内的饲料混合回顾性记录。牧场的牲畜数量从 2,982 头到 29,783 头不等,牛奶产量为 31.8 ± 5.93(±SD)千克,脂肪含量为 4.14 ± 0.461%,蛋白质含量为 3.26 ± 0.218%。收集的数据包括每日 TMR 营养偏差,计算方法是日粮营养含量减去观察值,再除以配方日粮中 CP、脂肪、NDF 和淀粉的浓度。分析数据时使用了时间(以 28 天为一个周期)和脂肪、CP、NDF 和淀粉中每种营养素单独或与其他营养素混合的正营养偏差天数的固定效应、牛群的随机效应和牛群内时间的重复测量效应。各牧场 CP、脂肪、NDF 和淀粉的营养偏差平均值(±SD)分别为 1.68 ± 2.655%、2.28 ± 4.473%、1.75 ± 2.621% 和 1.47 ± 2.147%。每期营养成分正偏差天数平均值(±SD)分别为 25.5 ± 3.47、25.5 ± 3.72、25.6 ± 3.49 和 25.9 ± 2.61。干物质摄入量(DMI;17.2 ± 1.78 kg/d)随着淀粉正偏差天数的增加而减少(-0.0483 ± 0.01265),随着CP正偏差天数的增加而增加(0.0211 ± 0.00942)。产奶量(31.4 ± 2.50 kg/d)随着淀粉正偏差天数的增加而增加(0.0486 ± 0.02110),随着 NDF 正偏差天数的增加而减少(-0.0298 ± 0.02202)。最后,妊娠率(21.7 ± 4.34)随脂肪正偏差天数(0.385 ± 0.1635)的增加而增加,随 CP 正偏差天数(-0.420 ± 0.1879)的增加而减少。在这些模型中,时期对产奶量有明显影响,但未观察到对怀孕率和DMI有影响。结果表明,牧场和营养物质类型是重要的变异来源,总体而言,牧场在 28 天期间有 92% 的天数过量饲喂营养物质 CP、脂肪、NDF 和淀粉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimation of the nutrient variation in feed delivery and effects on lactating dairy cattle
Diets formulated for dairy cattle are designed to supply nutrients, but rations delivered to the animal may deviate from original formulations, resulting in implications for milk production, composition, and even pregnancy rate. The objective of this study was to evaluate retrospective feed mixing records collected from 8 commercial dairy farms over 52 wk. Farms ranged from 2,982 to 29,783 animals, producing 31.8 ± 5.93 (±SD) kg of milk with 4.14 ± 0.461% fat and 3.26 ± 0.218% protein. Data collected included daily TMR nutrient deviation, calculated as diet nutrient content minus the observed divided by the formulated diet concentrations of CP, fat, NDF, and starch. Data were analyzed with fixed effects of time (modeled as 28-d periods) and days of positive nutrient deviation in fat, CP, NDF, and starch with each nutrient alone and in combination with the other nutrients, random effects of herd, and repeated measure of time within herd. The nutrient deviation by farm averaged (±SD) 1.68 ± 2.655, 2.28 ± 4.473, 1.75 ± 2.621, and 1.47 ± 2.147% for CP, fat, NDF, and starch, respectively. Days of positive nutrient deviation per period averaged (±SD) 25.5 ± 3.47, 25.5 ± 3.72, 25.6 ± 3.49, and 25.9 ± 2.61, respectively. Dry matter intake (DMI; 17.2 ± 1.78 kg/d) decreased with increasing positive deviation days in starch (−0.0483 ± 0.01265) and increased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (0.0211 ± 0.00942). Milk yield (31.4 ± 2.50 kg/d) increased with positive deviation days in starch (0.0486 ± 0.02110) and decreased with increased positive deviation days in NDF (−0.0298 ± 0.02202). Finally, pregnancy rate (21.7 ± 4.34) increased with increasing positive deviation days in fat (0.385 ± 0.1635) and decreased with increasing positive deviation days in CP (−0.420 ± 0.1879). For these models, period significantly affected milk yield but was not observed to affect pregnancy rate and DMI. Results suggest farm and nutrient type were significant sources of variation, and overall, farms overfeed nutrients CP, fat, NDF, and starch 92% of the days of a 28-d period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JDS communications
JDS communications Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board Getting to grips with resilience: Toward large-scale phenotyping of this complex trait* Development of genomic evaluation for methane efficiency in Canadian Holsteins* Validation and interdevice reliability of a behavior monitoring collar to measure rumination, feeding activity, and idle time of lactating dairy cows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1