将公平纳入患者安全事件分析的全系统战略

IF 2.3 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.04.004
{"title":"将公平纳入患者安全事件分析的全系统战略","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is a lack of framework to incorporate equity into event analysis. This quality improvement initiative involved the development of equity tools that were introduced in a two-hour interactive, case-based training across 11 acute care facilities at the largest municipal health care system in the United States. A pre and post survey (which included analysis of a clinical vignette) was also conducted to assess for knowledge and comfort embedding equity in patient safety event analysis, and to measure discomfort or distress during the training. A separate assessment was used to evaluate the tools.</p></div><div><h3>Equity Tools</h3><p>A visual aid, the Patient Equity Wheel, was created to facilitate more comprehensive and robust health equity discussions by compiling a comprehensive list of equity categories, including internal, external, and organizational dimensions of equity. The Wheel was designed for use during each phase of event analysis. An Embedding Equity in Root Cause Analysis Worksheet was developed to aid in assessing considerations of equitable care in the investigation process and includes questions to ask staff to further assess bias or equitable care factors.</p></div><div><h3>Initiative Outcome and Key Insights</h3><p>Participant knowledge and level of comfort increased after training. The most commonly unrecognized categories of bias were Training/Competencies, Structural Workflow, and Culture/Norms. Most participants responded that they had no discomfort or distress during the training. Post-training feedback noted that the tools were being used across the system in various stages of event analysis and have been reported to improve health equity conversations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":14835,"journal":{"name":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","volume":"50 8","pages":"Pages 606-611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systemwide Strategy to Embed Equity into Patient Safety Event Analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is a lack of framework to incorporate equity into event analysis. This quality improvement initiative involved the development of equity tools that were introduced in a two-hour interactive, case-based training across 11 acute care facilities at the largest municipal health care system in the United States. A pre and post survey (which included analysis of a clinical vignette) was also conducted to assess for knowledge and comfort embedding equity in patient safety event analysis, and to measure discomfort or distress during the training. A separate assessment was used to evaluate the tools.</p></div><div><h3>Equity Tools</h3><p>A visual aid, the Patient Equity Wheel, was created to facilitate more comprehensive and robust health equity discussions by compiling a comprehensive list of equity categories, including internal, external, and organizational dimensions of equity. The Wheel was designed for use during each phase of event analysis. An Embedding Equity in Root Cause Analysis Worksheet was developed to aid in assessing considerations of equitable care in the investigation process and includes questions to ask staff to further assess bias or equitable care factors.</p></div><div><h3>Initiative Outcome and Key Insights</h3><p>Participant knowledge and level of comfort increased after training. The most commonly unrecognized categories of bias were Training/Competencies, Structural Workflow, and Culture/Norms. Most participants responded that they had no discomfort or distress during the training. Post-training feedback noted that the tools were being used across the system in various stages of event analysis and have been reported to improve health equity conversations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"volume\":\"50 8\",\"pages\":\"Pages 606-611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155372502400103X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155372502400103X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景缺乏将公平纳入事件分析的框架。这项质量改进计划包括开发公平工具,并在美国最大的市级医疗保健系统的 11 家急症护理机构开展的两小时基于案例的互动培训中介绍这些工具。此外,还进行了一项前后调查(包括对临床小故事的分析),以评估将公平纳入患者安全事件分析的知识和舒适度,并测量培训期间的不适或困扰。患者公平轮(Patient Equity Wheel)是一种可视化辅助工具,旨在通过汇编一份全面的公平类别清单,包括公平的内部、外部和组织层面,促进更全面、更有力的健康公平讨论。该工具可在事件分析的各个阶段使用。开发了 "将公平纳入根本原因分析工作表",以帮助评估调查过程中对公平护理的考虑,其中包括向工作人员提出的问题,以进一步评估偏见或公平护理因素。最常见的未认识到的偏见类别是培训/能力、结构性工作流程和文化/规范。大多数参与者都表示在培训过程中没有任何不适或困扰。培训后的反馈意见指出,这些工具正在整个系统中用于不同阶段的事件分析,并被报告用于改善健康公平对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Systemwide Strategy to Embed Equity into Patient Safety Event Analysis

Background

There is a lack of framework to incorporate equity into event analysis. This quality improvement initiative involved the development of equity tools that were introduced in a two-hour interactive, case-based training across 11 acute care facilities at the largest municipal health care system in the United States. A pre and post survey (which included analysis of a clinical vignette) was also conducted to assess for knowledge and comfort embedding equity in patient safety event analysis, and to measure discomfort or distress during the training. A separate assessment was used to evaluate the tools.

Equity Tools

A visual aid, the Patient Equity Wheel, was created to facilitate more comprehensive and robust health equity discussions by compiling a comprehensive list of equity categories, including internal, external, and organizational dimensions of equity. The Wheel was designed for use during each phase of event analysis. An Embedding Equity in Root Cause Analysis Worksheet was developed to aid in assessing considerations of equitable care in the investigation process and includes questions to ask staff to further assess bias or equitable care factors.

Initiative Outcome and Key Insights

Participant knowledge and level of comfort increased after training. The most commonly unrecognized categories of bias were Training/Competencies, Structural Workflow, and Culture/Norms. Most participants responded that they had no discomfort or distress during the training. Post-training feedback noted that the tools were being used across the system in various stages of event analysis and have been reported to improve health equity conversations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
49 days
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Editorial Board The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 50th Anniversary Article Collections: Patient Communication Protecting Parkinson's Patients: Hospital Care Standards to Avoid Preventable Harm Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1