Alain C. Masquelet , Jacques de Saint-Julien , Renaud Denoix de Saint-Marc , Jean-François Mattei , Gérard Reach , Sylvain Rigal
{"title":"医学预防原则:二十年1,2","authors":"Alain C. Masquelet , Jacques de Saint-Julien , Renaud Denoix de Saint-Marc , Jean-François Mattei , Gérard Reach , Sylvain Rigal","doi":"10.1016/j.banm.2024.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The precautionary principle (PP) is a risk management method in situations of scientific uncertainty. Its lack of precise definition in official texts led to numerous interpretations in the past. The PP was initially limited to the environment. The extension to human health raised fears of an increase of proceedings and an interference with innovative research.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Twenty-four people involved in the precautionary principle have been interviewed and a literature review has been carried out.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A renewed analysis of the PP has emphasized several points: the PP is a complex process that includes a spirit of caution, rigorous reasoning, and evaluation of hypotheses and, lastly, precautionary measures. The major part of confusion raises when the PP is in danger of drifting into inappropriate precautionary measures; individual care medicine is well controlled by the “Code de déontologie médicale” (Code of Medical Ethics); biomedical research has scientific constraints and its own rules. In these two medical fields, PP is not applicable unless a major innovation raises an ethical problem; on the other hand, public health may be submitted to the PP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Consequently, mastery of the PP implies to promote training actions devoted to medical doctors, administrative and political decision makers, educational establishments and the media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55317,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine","volume":"208 6","pages":"Pages 772-780"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le principe de précaution en médecine : vingt ans après\",\"authors\":\"Alain C. Masquelet , Jacques de Saint-Julien , Renaud Denoix de Saint-Marc , Jean-François Mattei , Gérard Reach , Sylvain Rigal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.banm.2024.04.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The precautionary principle (PP) is a risk management method in situations of scientific uncertainty. Its lack of precise definition in official texts led to numerous interpretations in the past. The PP was initially limited to the environment. The extension to human health raised fears of an increase of proceedings and an interference with innovative research.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Twenty-four people involved in the precautionary principle have been interviewed and a literature review has been carried out.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A renewed analysis of the PP has emphasized several points: the PP is a complex process that includes a spirit of caution, rigorous reasoning, and evaluation of hypotheses and, lastly, precautionary measures. The major part of confusion raises when the PP is in danger of drifting into inappropriate precautionary measures; individual care medicine is well controlled by the “Code de déontologie médicale” (Code of Medical Ethics); biomedical research has scientific constraints and its own rules. In these two medical fields, PP is not applicable unless a major innovation raises an ethical problem; on the other hand, public health may be submitted to the PP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Consequently, mastery of the PP implies to promote training actions devoted to medical doctors, administrative and political decision makers, educational establishments and the media.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine\",\"volume\":\"208 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 772-780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001407924001183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001407924001183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的预防原则(PP)是在科学不确定情况下的一种风险管理方法。由于其在官方文本中缺乏准确定义,过去曾有过多种解释。PP 最初仅限于环境领域。对预防原则的重新分析强调了以下几点:预防原则是一个复杂的过程,包括谨慎的精神、严格的推理和对假设的评估,以及最后的预防措施。当 PP 有可能偏离不适当的预防措施时,就会产生主要的困惑;个人护理医学受到 "医德准则"(Code de déontologie médicale)的严格控制;生物医学研究有其自身的科学限制和规则。因此,掌握 PP 意味着促进专门针对医生、行政和政治决策者、教育机构和媒体的培训活动。
Le principe de précaution en médecine : vingt ans après
Objectives
The precautionary principle (PP) is a risk management method in situations of scientific uncertainty. Its lack of precise definition in official texts led to numerous interpretations in the past. The PP was initially limited to the environment. The extension to human health raised fears of an increase of proceedings and an interference with innovative research.
Method
Twenty-four people involved in the precautionary principle have been interviewed and a literature review has been carried out.
Results
A renewed analysis of the PP has emphasized several points: the PP is a complex process that includes a spirit of caution, rigorous reasoning, and evaluation of hypotheses and, lastly, precautionary measures. The major part of confusion raises when the PP is in danger of drifting into inappropriate precautionary measures; individual care medicine is well controlled by the “Code de déontologie médicale” (Code of Medical Ethics); biomedical research has scientific constraints and its own rules. In these two medical fields, PP is not applicable unless a major innovation raises an ethical problem; on the other hand, public health may be submitted to the PP.
Conclusion
Consequently, mastery of the PP implies to promote training actions devoted to medical doctors, administrative and political decision makers, educational establishments and the media.
期刊介绍:
Rédigé par des spécialistes à l''intention d''une Communauté pluridisciplinaire le Bulletin de l''Académie nationale de médecine est au service de toutes les professions médicales : médecins, pharmaciens, biologistes et vétérinaires ainsi que de l''Administration et des institutions intervenant dans le domaine de la santé.
Les mémoires originaux et les mises au point sur des thèmes d''actualité sont associés au compte rendu des discussions qui ont suivi leur présentation. Les rapports des commissions sur l''éthique médicale l''exercice de la profession les questions hospitalières la politique du médicament et l''enseignement de la médecine justifient les recommandations de l''Académie.