医学预防原则:二十年1,2

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.banm.2024.04.015
Alain C. Masquelet , Jacques de Saint-Julien , Renaud Denoix de Saint-Marc , Jean-François Mattei , Gérard Reach , Sylvain Rigal
{"title":"医学预防原则:二十年1,2","authors":"Alain C. Masquelet ,&nbsp;Jacques de Saint-Julien ,&nbsp;Renaud Denoix de Saint-Marc ,&nbsp;Jean-François Mattei ,&nbsp;Gérard Reach ,&nbsp;Sylvain Rigal","doi":"10.1016/j.banm.2024.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The precautionary principle (PP) is a risk management method in situations of scientific uncertainty. Its lack of precise definition in official texts led to numerous interpretations in the past. The PP was initially limited to the environment. The extension to human health raised fears of an increase of proceedings and an interference with innovative research.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Twenty-four people involved in the precautionary principle have been interviewed and a literature review has been carried out.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A renewed analysis of the PP has emphasized several points: the PP is a complex process that includes a spirit of caution, rigorous reasoning, and evaluation of hypotheses and, lastly, precautionary measures. The major part of confusion raises when the PP is in danger of drifting into inappropriate precautionary measures; individual care medicine is well controlled by the “Code de déontologie médicale” (Code of Medical Ethics); biomedical research has scientific constraints and its own rules. In these two medical fields, PP is not applicable unless a major innovation raises an ethical problem; on the other hand, public health may be submitted to the PP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Consequently, mastery of the PP implies to promote training actions devoted to medical doctors, administrative and political decision makers, educational establishments and the media.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55317,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine","volume":"208 6","pages":"Pages 772-780"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le principe de précaution en médecine : vingt ans après\",\"authors\":\"Alain C. Masquelet ,&nbsp;Jacques de Saint-Julien ,&nbsp;Renaud Denoix de Saint-Marc ,&nbsp;Jean-François Mattei ,&nbsp;Gérard Reach ,&nbsp;Sylvain Rigal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.banm.2024.04.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The precautionary principle (PP) is a risk management method in situations of scientific uncertainty. Its lack of precise definition in official texts led to numerous interpretations in the past. The PP was initially limited to the environment. The extension to human health raised fears of an increase of proceedings and an interference with innovative research.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Twenty-four people involved in the precautionary principle have been interviewed and a literature review has been carried out.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A renewed analysis of the PP has emphasized several points: the PP is a complex process that includes a spirit of caution, rigorous reasoning, and evaluation of hypotheses and, lastly, precautionary measures. The major part of confusion raises when the PP is in danger of drifting into inappropriate precautionary measures; individual care medicine is well controlled by the “Code de déontologie médicale” (Code of Medical Ethics); biomedical research has scientific constraints and its own rules. In these two medical fields, PP is not applicable unless a major innovation raises an ethical problem; on the other hand, public health may be submitted to the PP.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Consequently, mastery of the PP implies to promote training actions devoted to medical doctors, administrative and political decision makers, educational establishments and the media.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine\",\"volume\":\"208 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 772-780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001407924001183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001407924001183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的预防原则(PP)是在科学不确定情况下的一种风险管理方法。由于其在官方文本中缺乏准确定义,过去曾有过多种解释。PP 最初仅限于环境领域。对预防原则的重新分析强调了以下几点:预防原则是一个复杂的过程,包括谨慎的精神、严格的推理和对假设的评估,以及最后的预防措施。当 PP 有可能偏离不适当的预防措施时,就会产生主要的困惑;个人护理医学受到 "医德准则"(Code de déontologie médicale)的严格控制;生物医学研究有其自身的科学限制和规则。因此,掌握 PP 意味着促进专门针对医生、行政和政治决策者、教育机构和媒体的培训活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Le principe de précaution en médecine : vingt ans après

Objectives

The precautionary principle (PP) is a risk management method in situations of scientific uncertainty. Its lack of precise definition in official texts led to numerous interpretations in the past. The PP was initially limited to the environment. The extension to human health raised fears of an increase of proceedings and an interference with innovative research.

Method

Twenty-four people involved in the precautionary principle have been interviewed and a literature review has been carried out.

Results

A renewed analysis of the PP has emphasized several points: the PP is a complex process that includes a spirit of caution, rigorous reasoning, and evaluation of hypotheses and, lastly, precautionary measures. The major part of confusion raises when the PP is in danger of drifting into inappropriate precautionary measures; individual care medicine is well controlled by the “Code de déontologie médicale” (Code of Medical Ethics); biomedical research has scientific constraints and its own rules. In these two medical fields, PP is not applicable unless a major innovation raises an ethical problem; on the other hand, public health may be submitted to the PP.

Conclusion

Consequently, mastery of the PP implies to promote training actions devoted to medical doctors, administrative and political decision makers, educational establishments and the media.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
189
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Rédigé par des spécialistes à l''intention d''une Communauté pluridisciplinaire le Bulletin de l''Académie nationale de médecine est au service de toutes les professions médicales : médecins, pharmaciens, biologistes et vétérinaires ainsi que de l''Administration et des institutions intervenant dans le domaine de la santé. Les mémoires originaux et les mises au point sur des thèmes d''actualité sont associés au compte rendu des discussions qui ont suivi leur présentation. Les rapports des commissions sur l''éthique médicale l''exercice de la profession les questions hospitalières la politique du médicament et l''enseignement de la médecine justifient les recommandations de l''Académie.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Sommaire Index des mots Index des auteurs La prise en charge médicopsychologique des adultes jeunes amputés traumatiques du membre inférieur : une remise en continuité somato-psychique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1