非同质资产的批量交易者

Darren K. Hayunga, Henry J. Munneke
{"title":"非同质资产的批量交易者","authors":"Darren K. Hayunga, Henry J. Munneke","doi":"10.1007/s11146-024-09986-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article conducts a comprehensive analysis of the potential returns from investing in residential real property, with a special interest in any added gains due to trading larger volumes. Since the literature suggests that they are at a bargaining disadvantage, one notable finding is that individuals earn price benefits like so-called professional investors. Upon controlling for myriad well-known bargaining channels as well as investors’ demand characteristics, we find the mean price gains due to bargaining for individuals range from 4.2% for the lower volume investors (3–4 homes) to more than 7% for the highest volume traders (13 + properties). These average returns are for both buyers and sellers. Professionals exhibit bargaining acumen beginning with their first transactions (6.4%) and garner returns like individuals at higher volume levels (7.3%). The finding of investors’ bargaining effects generally increasing with greater volume implies gains in asymmetric information possibly through learning and/or reduced search costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22891,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volume Traders of Non-Homogenous Assets\",\"authors\":\"Darren K. Hayunga, Henry J. Munneke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11146-024-09986-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article conducts a comprehensive analysis of the potential returns from investing in residential real property, with a special interest in any added gains due to trading larger volumes. Since the literature suggests that they are at a bargaining disadvantage, one notable finding is that individuals earn price benefits like so-called professional investors. Upon controlling for myriad well-known bargaining channels as well as investors’ demand characteristics, we find the mean price gains due to bargaining for individuals range from 4.2% for the lower volume investors (3–4 homes) to more than 7% for the highest volume traders (13 + properties). These average returns are for both buyers and sellers. Professionals exhibit bargaining acumen beginning with their first transactions (6.4%) and garner returns like individuals at higher volume levels (7.3%). The finding of investors’ bargaining effects generally increasing with greater volume implies gains in asymmetric information possibly through learning and/or reduced search costs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-024-09986-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-024-09986-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对投资住宅不动产的潜在收益进行了全面分析,尤其关注交易量较大所带来的额外收益。由于有文献表明,个人投资者在议价方面处于劣势,因此一个值得注意的发现是,个人投资者也能像所谓的专业投资者一样获得价格收益。在控制了众多众所周知的议价渠道以及投资者的需求特征后,我们发现个人议价带来的平均价格收益从交易量较小的投资者(3-4 套住房)的 4.2% 到交易量最大的交易者(13 套以上房产)的 7% 不等。这些平均收益既适用于买方,也适用于卖方。专业人士从首次交易(6.4%)开始就表现出了讨价还价的敏锐性,在交易量较高时,他们也能像个人投资者一样获得回报(7.3%)。投资者的讨价还价效应一般随着交易量的增加而增加,这一发现意味着不对称信息可能通过学习和/或降低搜索成本而获得收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Volume Traders of Non-Homogenous Assets

This article conducts a comprehensive analysis of the potential returns from investing in residential real property, with a special interest in any added gains due to trading larger volumes. Since the literature suggests that they are at a bargaining disadvantage, one notable finding is that individuals earn price benefits like so-called professional investors. Upon controlling for myriad well-known bargaining channels as well as investors’ demand characteristics, we find the mean price gains due to bargaining for individuals range from 4.2% for the lower volume investors (3–4 homes) to more than 7% for the highest volume traders (13 + properties). These average returns are for both buyers and sellers. Professionals exhibit bargaining acumen beginning with their first transactions (6.4%) and garner returns like individuals at higher volume levels (7.3%). The finding of investors’ bargaining effects generally increasing with greater volume implies gains in asymmetric information possibly through learning and/or reduced search costs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real Estate Automated Valuation Model with Explainable Artificial Intelligence Based on Shapley Values Differential Measurement Error in House Price Indices The Spillover Effects of Land Value Taxation: How Can It Affect Your Neighbors' Job Growth? The Impact of Monetary Policy on REITs: Evidence from FOMC Announcements Tax Induced Divestment in the Residential Market - Insights from Investors and Non-investors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1