曲率比例空间激光雷达测距与制图 (LOAM)

IF 3.1 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1
Clayder Gonzalez, Martin Adams
{"title":"曲率比例空间激光雷达测距与制图 (LOAM)","authors":"Clayder Gonzalez, Martin Adams","doi":"10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The LiDAR Odometry and Mapping (LOAM) algorithm ranks in second place in the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Toyota Technological Institute (KITTI), Visual Odometry/SLAM Evaluations. It utilizes a feature extraction algorithm based on the evaluation of the curvature of points under test, to produce estimated smooth and non-smooth regions within typically laser based Point Cloud Data (PCD). This feature extractor (FE) however, does not take into account PCD spatial or detection uncertainty, which can result in the divergence of the LOAM algorithm. Therefore, this article proposes the use of the Curvature Scale Space (CSS) algorithm as a replacement for LOAM’s current feature extractor. It justifies the substitution, based on the CSS algorithm’s similar computational complexity but improved feature detection repeatability. LOAM’s current feature extractor and the proposed CSS feature extractor are tested and compared with simulated and real data, including the KITTI odometry-laser data set. Additionally, a recent deep learning based LiDAR Odometry (LO) algorithm, the Convolutional Auto-Encoder (CAE)-LO algorithm, will also be compared, using this data set, in terms of its computational speed and performance. Performance comparisons are made based on the Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) and Cardinalized Optimal Linear Assignment (COLA) metrics. Based on these metrics, the comparisons show significant improvements of the LOAM algorithm with the CSS feature extractor compared with the benchmark versions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curvature Scale Space LiDAR Odometry And Mapping (LOAM)\",\"authors\":\"Clayder Gonzalez, Martin Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The LiDAR Odometry and Mapping (LOAM) algorithm ranks in second place in the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Toyota Technological Institute (KITTI), Visual Odometry/SLAM Evaluations. It utilizes a feature extraction algorithm based on the evaluation of the curvature of points under test, to produce estimated smooth and non-smooth regions within typically laser based Point Cloud Data (PCD). This feature extractor (FE) however, does not take into account PCD spatial or detection uncertainty, which can result in the divergence of the LOAM algorithm. Therefore, this article proposes the use of the Curvature Scale Space (CSS) algorithm as a replacement for LOAM’s current feature extractor. It justifies the substitution, based on the CSS algorithm’s similar computational complexity but improved feature detection repeatability. LOAM’s current feature extractor and the proposed CSS feature extractor are tested and compared with simulated and real data, including the KITTI odometry-laser data set. Additionally, a recent deep learning based LiDAR Odometry (LO) algorithm, the Convolutional Auto-Encoder (CAE)-LO algorithm, will also be compared, using this data set, in terms of its computational speed and performance. Performance comparisons are made based on the Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) and Cardinalized Optimal Linear Assignment (COLA) metrics. Based on these metrics, the comparisons show significant improvements of the LOAM algorithm with the CSS feature extractor compared with the benchmark versions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在卡尔斯鲁厄理工学院和丰田技术研究所(KITTI)的视觉目标测量/SLAM 评估中,激光雷达目标测量和绘图(LOAM)算法排名第二。它利用一种基于被测点曲率评估的特征提取算法,在典型的激光点云数据(PCD)中生成估计的平滑和非平滑区域。然而,这种特征提取器(FE)并没有考虑到 PCD 空间或检测的不确定性,这可能会导致 LOAM 算法出现偏差。因此,本文建议使用曲率尺度空间(CSS)算法来替代 LOAM 当前的特征提取器。基于CSS算法相似的计算复杂度和更好的特征检测可重复性,本文对这种替代方法进行了论证。LOAM 当前的特征提取器和所提出的 CSS 特征提取器通过模拟数据和真实数据(包括 KITTI 光度计-激光数据集)进行了测试和比较。此外,基于深度学习的最新激光雷达测距(LO)算法,即卷积自动编码器(CAE)-LO 算法,也将使用该数据集对其计算速度和性能进行比较。性能比较基于绝对轨迹误差(ATE)和标称最优线性分配(COLA)指标。根据这些指标,比较结果表明,与基准版本相比,采用 CSS 特征提取器的 LOAM 算法有显著改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Curvature Scale Space LiDAR Odometry And Mapping (LOAM)

The LiDAR Odometry and Mapping (LOAM) algorithm ranks in second place in the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Toyota Technological Institute (KITTI), Visual Odometry/SLAM Evaluations. It utilizes a feature extraction algorithm based on the evaluation of the curvature of points under test, to produce estimated smooth and non-smooth regions within typically laser based Point Cloud Data (PCD). This feature extractor (FE) however, does not take into account PCD spatial or detection uncertainty, which can result in the divergence of the LOAM algorithm. Therefore, this article proposes the use of the Curvature Scale Space (CSS) algorithm as a replacement for LOAM’s current feature extractor. It justifies the substitution, based on the CSS algorithm’s similar computational complexity but improved feature detection repeatability. LOAM’s current feature extractor and the proposed CSS feature extractor are tested and compared with simulated and real data, including the KITTI odometry-laser data set. Additionally, a recent deep learning based LiDAR Odometry (LO) algorithm, the Convolutional Auto-Encoder (CAE)-LO algorithm, will also be compared, using this data set, in terms of its computational speed and performance. Performance comparisons are made based on the Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) and Cardinalized Optimal Linear Assignment (COLA) metrics. Based on these metrics, the comparisons show significant improvements of the LOAM algorithm with the CSS feature extractor compared with the benchmark versions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 工程技术-机器人学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
219
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems bridges the gap between theory and practice in all areas of intelligent systems and robotics. It publishes original, peer reviewed contributions from initial concept and theory to prototyping to final product development and commercialization. On the theoretical side, the journal features papers focusing on intelligent systems engineering, distributed intelligence systems, multi-level systems, intelligent control, multi-robot systems, cooperation and coordination of unmanned vehicle systems, etc. On the application side, the journal emphasizes autonomous systems, industrial robotic systems, multi-robot systems, aerial vehicles, mobile robot platforms, underwater robots, sensors, sensor-fusion, and sensor-based control. Readers will also find papers on real applications of intelligent and robotic systems (e.g., mechatronics, manufacturing, biomedical, underwater, humanoid, mobile/legged robot and space applications, etc.).
期刊最新文献
UAV Routing for Enhancing the Performance of a Classifier-in-the-loop DFT-VSLAM: A Dynamic Optical Flow Tracking VSLAM Method Design and Development of a Robust Control Platform for a 3-Finger Robotic Gripper Using EMG-Derived Hand Muscle Signals in NI LabVIEW Neural Network-based Adaptive Finite-time Control for 2-DOF Helicopter Systems with Prescribed Performance and Input Saturation Six-Degree-of-Freedom Pose Estimation Method for Multi-Source Feature Points Based on Fully Convolutional Neural Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1