Felix Schlicht , Jan Vosshenrich , Ricardo Donners , Alina Carolin Seifert , Matthias Fenchel , Dominik Nickel , Markus Obmann , Dorothee Harder , Hanns-Christian Breit
{"title":"0.55 T 下腰椎磁共振成像中基于深度学习的高级图像重建--与基于深度学习的传统重建相比对图像质量和采集时间的影响","authors":"Felix Schlicht , Jan Vosshenrich , Ricardo Donners , Alina Carolin Seifert , Matthias Fenchel , Dominik Nickel , Markus Obmann , Dorothee Harder , Hanns-Christian Breit","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate an optimized deep leaning-based image post-processing technique in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T in terms of image quality and image acquisition time.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Lumbar spine imaging was conducted on 18 patients using a 0.55 T MRI scanner, employing conventional (CDLR) and advanced (ADLR) deep learning-based post-processing techniques. Two musculoskeletal radiologists visually evaluated the images using a 5-point Likert scale to assess image quality and resolution. Quantitative assessment in terms of signal intensities (SI) and contrast ratios was performed by region of interest measurements in different body-tissues (vertebral bone, intervertebral disc, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid and autochthonous back muscles) to investigate differences between CDLR and ADLR sequences.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The images processed with the advanced technique (ADLR) were rated superior to the conventional technique (CDLR) in terms of signal/contrast, resolution, and assessability of the spinal canal and neural foramen. The interrater agreement was moderate for signal/contrast (ICC = 0.68) and good for resolution (ICC = 0.77), but moderate for spinal canal and neuroforaminal assessability (ICC = 0.55). Quantitative assessment showed a higher contrast ratio for fluid-sensitive sequences in the ADLR images. The use of ADLR reduced image acquisition time by 44.4%, from 14:22 min to 07:59 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms improve the visually perceived image quality in lumbar spine imaging at 0.55 T while simultaneously allowing to substantially decrease image acquisition times.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>Advanced deep learning-based image post-processing techniques (ADLR) in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T significantly improves image quality while reducing image acquisition time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000224/pdfft?md5=758cb01b85dcdca1cb917fb3cdfbb660&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000224-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T – Effects on image quality and acquisition time in comparison to conventional deep learning-based reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Felix Schlicht , Jan Vosshenrich , Ricardo Donners , Alina Carolin Seifert , Matthias Fenchel , Dominik Nickel , Markus Obmann , Dorothee Harder , Hanns-Christian Breit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate an optimized deep leaning-based image post-processing technique in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T in terms of image quality and image acquisition time.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Lumbar spine imaging was conducted on 18 patients using a 0.55 T MRI scanner, employing conventional (CDLR) and advanced (ADLR) deep learning-based post-processing techniques. Two musculoskeletal radiologists visually evaluated the images using a 5-point Likert scale to assess image quality and resolution. Quantitative assessment in terms of signal intensities (SI) and contrast ratios was performed by region of interest measurements in different body-tissues (vertebral bone, intervertebral disc, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid and autochthonous back muscles) to investigate differences between CDLR and ADLR sequences.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The images processed with the advanced technique (ADLR) were rated superior to the conventional technique (CDLR) in terms of signal/contrast, resolution, and assessability of the spinal canal and neural foramen. The interrater agreement was moderate for signal/contrast (ICC = 0.68) and good for resolution (ICC = 0.77), but moderate for spinal canal and neuroforaminal assessability (ICC = 0.55). Quantitative assessment showed a higher contrast ratio for fluid-sensitive sequences in the ADLR images. The use of ADLR reduced image acquisition time by 44.4%, from 14:22 min to 07:59 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms improve the visually perceived image quality in lumbar spine imaging at 0.55 T while simultaneously allowing to substantially decrease image acquisition times.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><p>Advanced deep learning-based image post-processing techniques (ADLR) in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T significantly improves image quality while reducing image acquisition time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000224/pdfft?md5=758cb01b85dcdca1cb917fb3cdfbb660&pid=1-s2.0-S2352047724000224-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047724000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
材料和方法使用 0.55 T MRI 扫描仪对 18 名患者进行了腰椎成像,采用了基于深度学习的传统(CDLR)和高级(ADLR)后处理技术。两名肌肉骨骼放射科医生使用 5 点李克特量表对图像进行目测评估,以评估图像质量和分辨率。通过对不同的身体组织(椎骨、椎间盘、脊髓、脑脊液和自体背部肌肉)进行感兴趣区测量,对信号强度(SI)和对比度比率进行定量评估,以研究 CDLR 和 ADLR 序列之间的差异。结果使用高级技术(ADLR)处理的图像在信号/对比度、分辨率以及椎管和神经孔的可评估性方面均优于传统技术(CDLR)。在信号/对比度(ICC = 0.68)和分辨率(ICC = 0.77)方面,检查者之间的一致性为中等,但在椎管和神经孔的可评估性(ICC = 0.55)方面,检查者之间的一致性为中等。定量评估显示,ADLR图像中流体敏感序列的对比度更高。结论基于深度学习的高级图像重建算法提高了 0.55 T 腰椎成像的视觉感知图像质量,同时大幅缩短了图像采集时间。临床相关性基于深度学习的高级图像后处理技术(ADLR)在 0.55 T 腰椎 MRI 中的应用显著提高了图像质量,同时缩短了图像采集时间。
Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T – Effects on image quality and acquisition time in comparison to conventional deep learning-based reconstruction
Objectives
To evaluate an optimized deep leaning-based image post-processing technique in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T in terms of image quality and image acquisition time.
Materials and methods
Lumbar spine imaging was conducted on 18 patients using a 0.55 T MRI scanner, employing conventional (CDLR) and advanced (ADLR) deep learning-based post-processing techniques. Two musculoskeletal radiologists visually evaluated the images using a 5-point Likert scale to assess image quality and resolution. Quantitative assessment in terms of signal intensities (SI) and contrast ratios was performed by region of interest measurements in different body-tissues (vertebral bone, intervertebral disc, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid and autochthonous back muscles) to investigate differences between CDLR and ADLR sequences.
Results
The images processed with the advanced technique (ADLR) were rated superior to the conventional technique (CDLR) in terms of signal/contrast, resolution, and assessability of the spinal canal and neural foramen. The interrater agreement was moderate for signal/contrast (ICC = 0.68) and good for resolution (ICC = 0.77), but moderate for spinal canal and neuroforaminal assessability (ICC = 0.55). Quantitative assessment showed a higher contrast ratio for fluid-sensitive sequences in the ADLR images. The use of ADLR reduced image acquisition time by 44.4%, from 14:22 min to 07:59 min.
Conclusions
Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction algorithms improve the visually perceived image quality in lumbar spine imaging at 0.55 T while simultaneously allowing to substantially decrease image acquisition times.
Clinical relevance
Advanced deep learning-based image post-processing techniques (ADLR) in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T significantly improves image quality while reducing image acquisition time.