在儿科急诊复苏中使用视频审查团队领导评估工具的有效性证据

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES AEM Education and Training Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1002/aet2.10985
Victoria Hartwell MD, MEd, Katherine Edmunds MD, MEd, Laura Elliott MD, Brenda Williams MSN, RN, Paul T. Menk MD, Gary L. Geis MD
{"title":"在儿科急诊复苏中使用视频审查团队领导评估工具的有效性证据","authors":"Victoria Hartwell MD, MEd,&nbsp;Katherine Edmunds MD, MEd,&nbsp;Laura Elliott MD,&nbsp;Brenda Williams MSN, RN,&nbsp;Paul T. Menk MD,&nbsp;Gary L. Geis MD","doi":"10.1002/aet2.10985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Effective leadership of health care action teams has demonstrated positive influence on team performance and patient care, but there is no consensus on how to assess these skills. We developed a novel team leadership assessment tool for leaders of interprofessional pediatric resuscitation teams and collected validity evidence for this tool using video review.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a prospective cohort study from November 2021 to October 2022. A novel team leadership assessment tool was developed using literature review and local expertise and then piloted and refined using medical simulation. Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows from a single tertiary care pediatric medical center were enrolled, and videos of one medical resuscitation and one trauma resuscitation were collected per fellow each month. Three reviewers underwent reviewer training and then scored the videos using the assessment tool. Raters provided feedback on feasibility and ease of use using a 5-point Likert scale. Inter-rater reliability for the assessment tool using Gwet's agreement coefficient and the association between performance and clinical level of training using generalized linear mixed model were calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twelve PEM fellows enrolled and 146 videos were reviewed. The inter-rater reliability for each domain ranged from 0.45 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) to 0.59 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), with the inter-rater reliability of the total score being 0.49 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The reviewers’ mean ratings of the elements of the tool were as follows: clarity of the domains (4.6/5), the independence of each domain from each other (3.9/5), the ease of use of the 5-point Likert scale (4.5/5), the usefulness of the provided examples for each domain (4.6/5), and the ability to assess each domain without having to rewatch (4.5/5). The tool differentiated between levels of clinical training for two of the six domains (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.02).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We developed a novel team leadership assessment tool for pediatric resuscitation team leaders that demonstrated moderate inter-rater reliability. The tool was easy to use and feasible for educators to assess the performance of PEM trainees in complex high-stakes clinical situations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":37032,"journal":{"name":"AEM Education and Training","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10985","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity evidence for a team-leading assessment tool in pediatric emergency resuscitations using video review\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Hartwell MD, MEd,&nbsp;Katherine Edmunds MD, MEd,&nbsp;Laura Elliott MD,&nbsp;Brenda Williams MSN, RN,&nbsp;Paul T. Menk MD,&nbsp;Gary L. Geis MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aet2.10985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Effective leadership of health care action teams has demonstrated positive influence on team performance and patient care, but there is no consensus on how to assess these skills. We developed a novel team leadership assessment tool for leaders of interprofessional pediatric resuscitation teams and collected validity evidence for this tool using video review.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a prospective cohort study from November 2021 to October 2022. A novel team leadership assessment tool was developed using literature review and local expertise and then piloted and refined using medical simulation. Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows from a single tertiary care pediatric medical center were enrolled, and videos of one medical resuscitation and one trauma resuscitation were collected per fellow each month. Three reviewers underwent reviewer training and then scored the videos using the assessment tool. Raters provided feedback on feasibility and ease of use using a 5-point Likert scale. Inter-rater reliability for the assessment tool using Gwet's agreement coefficient and the association between performance and clinical level of training using generalized linear mixed model were calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twelve PEM fellows enrolled and 146 videos were reviewed. The inter-rater reliability for each domain ranged from 0.45 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) to 0.59 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001), with the inter-rater reliability of the total score being 0.49 (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). The reviewers’ mean ratings of the elements of the tool were as follows: clarity of the domains (4.6/5), the independence of each domain from each other (3.9/5), the ease of use of the 5-point Likert scale (4.5/5), the usefulness of the provided examples for each domain (4.6/5), and the ability to assess each domain without having to rewatch (4.5/5). The tool differentiated between levels of clinical training for two of the six domains (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.02).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We developed a novel team leadership assessment tool for pediatric resuscitation team leaders that demonstrated moderate inter-rater reliability. The tool was easy to use and feasible for educators to assess the performance of PEM trainees in complex high-stakes clinical situations.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aet2.10985\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AEM Education and Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AEM Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aet2.10985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景医疗行动团队的有效领导对团队绩效和患者护理具有积极影响,但如何评估这些技能尚未达成共识。我们为跨专业儿科复苏团队的领导者开发了一种新型团队领导力评估工具,并通过视频审查收集了该工具的有效性证据。 方法 这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究时间为 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 10 月。我们利用文献综述和本地专业知识开发了一种新型团队领导力评估工具,然后利用医学模拟进行了试点和改进。来自一家三级儿科医疗中心的儿科急诊医学(PEM)研究员参与了这项研究,每月为每位研究员收集一次医疗复苏和一次创伤复苏的视频。三名评审员接受了评审员培训,然后使用评估工具对视频进行评分。评审员使用 5 点李克特量表就可行性和易用性提供反馈意见。使用 Gwet 一致系数计算了评估工具的评分者之间的可靠性,并使用广义线性混合模型计算了评分表现与临床培训水平之间的关联。 结果 12 名 PEM 学员参加了评估,共审查了 146 个视频。每个领域的评分者间信度为 0.45 (p < 0.0001) 至 0.59 (p < 0.0001),总分的评分者间信度为 0.49 (p < 0.0001)。评审员对该工具各要素的平均评分如下:各领域的清晰度(4.6/5)、各领域之间的独立性(3.9/5)、5 点李克特量表的易用性(4.5/5)、为各领域提供的示例的实用性(4.6/5)以及无需重新观看即可评估各领域的能力(4.5/5)。在六个领域中,该工具对两个领域的临床培训水平进行了区分(p < 0.02)。 结论 我们为儿科复苏团队领导开发了一种新颖的团队领导力评估工具,该工具显示出中等程度的评分者间可靠性。该工具易于使用,可供教育工作者评估儿科急救培训学员在复杂、高风险的临床环境中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validity evidence for a team-leading assessment tool in pediatric emergency resuscitations using video review

Background

Effective leadership of health care action teams has demonstrated positive influence on team performance and patient care, but there is no consensus on how to assess these skills. We developed a novel team leadership assessment tool for leaders of interprofessional pediatric resuscitation teams and collected validity evidence for this tool using video review.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study from November 2021 to October 2022. A novel team leadership assessment tool was developed using literature review and local expertise and then piloted and refined using medical simulation. Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows from a single tertiary care pediatric medical center were enrolled, and videos of one medical resuscitation and one trauma resuscitation were collected per fellow each month. Three reviewers underwent reviewer training and then scored the videos using the assessment tool. Raters provided feedback on feasibility and ease of use using a 5-point Likert scale. Inter-rater reliability for the assessment tool using Gwet's agreement coefficient and the association between performance and clinical level of training using generalized linear mixed model were calculated.

Results

Twelve PEM fellows enrolled and 146 videos were reviewed. The inter-rater reliability for each domain ranged from 0.45 (p < 0.0001) to 0.59 (p < 0.0001), with the inter-rater reliability of the total score being 0.49 (p < 0.0001). The reviewers’ mean ratings of the elements of the tool were as follows: clarity of the domains (4.6/5), the independence of each domain from each other (3.9/5), the ease of use of the 5-point Likert scale (4.5/5), the usefulness of the provided examples for each domain (4.6/5), and the ability to assess each domain without having to rewatch (4.5/5). The tool differentiated between levels of clinical training for two of the six domains (p < 0.02).

Conclusions

We developed a novel team leadership assessment tool for pediatric resuscitation team leaders that demonstrated moderate inter-rater reliability. The tool was easy to use and feasible for educators to assess the performance of PEM trainees in complex high-stakes clinical situations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AEM Education and Training
AEM Education and Training Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
89
期刊最新文献
Changing behavior and promoting clinical empathy through a patient experience curriculum for health profession students Leadership training in emergency medicine: A national survey AI passed the test, but can it make the rounds? Effects of opening a vertical care area on emergency medicine resident clinical experience Precision education in medicine: A necessary transformation to better prepare physicians to meet the needs of their patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1