在非临床普通毒理学研究中使用和实施虚拟对照的注意事项

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology Pub Date : 2024-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105632
Xavier Palazzi , Lennart T. Anger , Theresa Boulineau , Armelle Grevot , Magali Guffroy , Kristin Henson , Natalie Hoepp , Matt Jacobsen , Vijay P. Kale , John Kreeger , Joan H. Lane , Dingzhou Li , Wolfgang Muster , Brianna Paisley , Lila Ramaiah , Nicola Robertson , Valerie Shultz , Thomas Steger Hartmann , Richard Westhouse
{"title":"在非临床普通毒理学研究中使用和实施虚拟对照的注意事项","authors":"Xavier Palazzi ,&nbsp;Lennart T. Anger ,&nbsp;Theresa Boulineau ,&nbsp;Armelle Grevot ,&nbsp;Magali Guffroy ,&nbsp;Kristin Henson ,&nbsp;Natalie Hoepp ,&nbsp;Matt Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Vijay P. Kale ,&nbsp;John Kreeger ,&nbsp;Joan H. Lane ,&nbsp;Dingzhou Li ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Muster ,&nbsp;Brianna Paisley ,&nbsp;Lila Ramaiah ,&nbsp;Nicola Robertson ,&nbsp;Valerie Shultz ,&nbsp;Thomas Steger Hartmann ,&nbsp;Richard Westhouse","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The replacement of a proportion of concurrent controls by virtual controls in nonclinical safety studies has gained traction over the last few years. This is supported by foundational work, encouraged by regulators, and aligned with societal expectations regarding the use of animals in research. This paper provides an overview of the points to consider for any institution on the verge of implementing this concept, with emphasis given on database creation, risks, and discipline-specific perspectives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 105632"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Points to consider regarding the use and implementation of virtual controls in nonclinical general toxicology studies\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Palazzi ,&nbsp;Lennart T. Anger ,&nbsp;Theresa Boulineau ,&nbsp;Armelle Grevot ,&nbsp;Magali Guffroy ,&nbsp;Kristin Henson ,&nbsp;Natalie Hoepp ,&nbsp;Matt Jacobsen ,&nbsp;Vijay P. Kale ,&nbsp;John Kreeger ,&nbsp;Joan H. Lane ,&nbsp;Dingzhou Li ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Muster ,&nbsp;Brianna Paisley ,&nbsp;Lila Ramaiah ,&nbsp;Nicola Robertson ,&nbsp;Valerie Shultz ,&nbsp;Thomas Steger Hartmann ,&nbsp;Richard Westhouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The replacement of a proportion of concurrent controls by virtual controls in nonclinical safety studies has gained traction over the last few years. This is supported by foundational work, encouraged by regulators, and aligned with societal expectations regarding the use of animals in research. This paper provides an overview of the points to consider for any institution on the verge of implementing this concept, with emphasis given on database creation, risks, and discipline-specific perspectives.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105632\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000734\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230024000734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去几年中,在非临床安全性研究中用虚拟对照组取代一定比例的同期对照组的做法越来越受到重视。这得到了基础研究工作的支持、监管机构的鼓励以及社会对在研究中使用动物的期望。本文概述了即将实施这一概念的任何机构需要考虑的要点,重点是数据库创建、风险和特定学科的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Points to consider regarding the use and implementation of virtual controls in nonclinical general toxicology studies

The replacement of a proportion of concurrent controls by virtual controls in nonclinical safety studies has gained traction over the last few years. This is supported by foundational work, encouraged by regulators, and aligned with societal expectations regarding the use of animals in research. This paper provides an overview of the points to consider for any institution on the verge of implementing this concept, with emphasis given on database creation, risks, and discipline-specific perspectives.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
期刊最新文献
Comparison of carbonyls and tobacco-specific nitrosamines in aerosols of heated tobacco products and conventional cigarette smoke using both targeted and untargeted analytical methods Accurate regulatory classification of chemical respiratory allergens: The case for robust characterisation of causation Applicability of the in vitro skin irritation methods (EpiSkin™, EpiDerm™ SIT) to organosilicon-based substances Editorial Board Toxicological evaluation of vanadium and derivation of a parenteral tolerable intake value for medical devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1