以行动者为中心、可扩展的土地系统类型学,解决世界热带干旱林地生物多样性丧失问题

IF 8.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Global Environmental Change Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102849
Marie Pratzer , Patrick Meyfroidt , Marina Antongiovanni , Roxana Aragon , Germán Baldi , Stasiek Czaplicki Cabezas , Cristina A. de la Vega-Leinert , Shalini Dhyani , Jean-Christophe Diepart , Pedro David Fernandez , Stephen T. Garnett , Gregorio I. Gavier Pizarro , Tamanna Kalam , Pradeep Koulgi , Yann le Polain de Waroux , Sofia Marinaro , Matias Mastrangelo , Daniel Mueller , Robert Mueller , Ranjini Murali , Tobias Kuemmerle
{"title":"以行动者为中心、可扩展的土地系统类型学,解决世界热带干旱林地生物多样性丧失问题","authors":"Marie Pratzer ,&nbsp;Patrick Meyfroidt ,&nbsp;Marina Antongiovanni ,&nbsp;Roxana Aragon ,&nbsp;Germán Baldi ,&nbsp;Stasiek Czaplicki Cabezas ,&nbsp;Cristina A. de la Vega-Leinert ,&nbsp;Shalini Dhyani ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Diepart ,&nbsp;Pedro David Fernandez ,&nbsp;Stephen T. Garnett ,&nbsp;Gregorio I. Gavier Pizarro ,&nbsp;Tamanna Kalam ,&nbsp;Pradeep Koulgi ,&nbsp;Yann le Polain de Waroux ,&nbsp;Sofia Marinaro ,&nbsp;Matias Mastrangelo ,&nbsp;Daniel Mueller ,&nbsp;Robert Mueller ,&nbsp;Ranjini Murali ,&nbsp;Tobias Kuemmerle","doi":"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Land use is a key driver of the ongoing biodiversity crisis and therefore also a major opportunity for its mitigation. However, appropriately considering the diversity of land-use actors and activities in conservation assessments and planning is challenging. As a result, top-down conservation policy and planning are often criticized for a lack of contextual nuance widely acknowledged to be required for effective and just conservation action. To address these challenges, we have developed a conceptually consistent, scalable land system typology and demonstrated its usefulness for the world's tropical dry woodlands. Our typology identifies key land-use actors and activities that represent typical threats to biodiversity and opportunities for conservation action. We identified land systems in a hierarchical way, with a global level allowing for broad-scale planning and comparative work. Nested within it, a regionalized level provides social-ecological specificity and context. We showcase this regionalization for five hotspots of land-use change and biodiversity loss in dry woodlands in Argentina, Bolivia, Mozambique, India, and Cambodia. Unlike other approaches to present land use, our typology accounts for the complexity of overlapping land uses. This allows, for example, assessment of how conservation measures conflict with other land uses, understanding of the social-ecological co-benefits and trade-offs of area-based conservation, mapping of threats, or targeting area-based and actor-based conservation measures. Moreover, our framework enables cross-regional learning by revealing both commonalities and social-ecological differences, as we demonstrate here for the world's tropical dry woodlands. By bridging the gap between global, top-down, and regional, bottom-up initiatives, our framework enables more contextually appropriate sustainability planning across scales and more targeted and social-ecologically nuanced interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":328,"journal":{"name":"Global Environmental Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000530/pdfft?md5=6fc2fac10b61c0f4cd38d8f1dbc4dac6&pid=1-s2.0-S0959378024000530-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An actor-centered, scalable land system typology for addressing biodiversity loss in the world’s tropical dry woodlands\",\"authors\":\"Marie Pratzer ,&nbsp;Patrick Meyfroidt ,&nbsp;Marina Antongiovanni ,&nbsp;Roxana Aragon ,&nbsp;Germán Baldi ,&nbsp;Stasiek Czaplicki Cabezas ,&nbsp;Cristina A. de la Vega-Leinert ,&nbsp;Shalini Dhyani ,&nbsp;Jean-Christophe Diepart ,&nbsp;Pedro David Fernandez ,&nbsp;Stephen T. Garnett ,&nbsp;Gregorio I. Gavier Pizarro ,&nbsp;Tamanna Kalam ,&nbsp;Pradeep Koulgi ,&nbsp;Yann le Polain de Waroux ,&nbsp;Sofia Marinaro ,&nbsp;Matias Mastrangelo ,&nbsp;Daniel Mueller ,&nbsp;Robert Mueller ,&nbsp;Ranjini Murali ,&nbsp;Tobias Kuemmerle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Land use is a key driver of the ongoing biodiversity crisis and therefore also a major opportunity for its mitigation. However, appropriately considering the diversity of land-use actors and activities in conservation assessments and planning is challenging. As a result, top-down conservation policy and planning are often criticized for a lack of contextual nuance widely acknowledged to be required for effective and just conservation action. To address these challenges, we have developed a conceptually consistent, scalable land system typology and demonstrated its usefulness for the world's tropical dry woodlands. Our typology identifies key land-use actors and activities that represent typical threats to biodiversity and opportunities for conservation action. We identified land systems in a hierarchical way, with a global level allowing for broad-scale planning and comparative work. Nested within it, a regionalized level provides social-ecological specificity and context. We showcase this regionalization for five hotspots of land-use change and biodiversity loss in dry woodlands in Argentina, Bolivia, Mozambique, India, and Cambodia. Unlike other approaches to present land use, our typology accounts for the complexity of overlapping land uses. This allows, for example, assessment of how conservation measures conflict with other land uses, understanding of the social-ecological co-benefits and trade-offs of area-based conservation, mapping of threats, or targeting area-based and actor-based conservation measures. Moreover, our framework enables cross-regional learning by revealing both commonalities and social-ecological differences, as we demonstrate here for the world's tropical dry woodlands. By bridging the gap between global, top-down, and regional, bottom-up initiatives, our framework enables more contextually appropriate sustainability planning across scales and more targeted and social-ecologically nuanced interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000530/pdfft?md5=6fc2fac10b61c0f4cd38d8f1dbc4dac6&pid=1-s2.0-S0959378024000530-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Environmental Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"6\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000530\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Environmental Change","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378024000530","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地利用是当前生物多样性危机的主要驱动因素,因此也是缓解危机的主要机会。然而,在保护评估和规划中适当考虑土地使用参与者和活动的多样性具有挑战性。因此,自上而下的保护政策和规划经常受到批评,因为缺乏公认的有效和公正保护行动所需的背景细微差别。为了应对这些挑战,我们开发了一种概念一致、可扩展的土地系统类型学,并证明了它对世界热带干旱林地的实用性。我们的类型学确定了主要的土地使用行为者和活动,这些行为者和活动代表了对生物多样性的典型威胁和保护行动的机遇。我们以分层的方式确定了土地系统,其中全球层面可用于大范围规划和比较工作。其中,区域化层次提供了社会生态的特殊性和背景。我们针对阿根廷、玻利维亚、莫桑比克、印度和柬埔寨干旱林地的五个土地利用变化和生物多样性丧失热点地区展示了这种区域化方法。与其他介绍土地利用的方法不同,我们的类型学考虑到了重叠土地利用的复杂性。例如,这样就可以评估保护措施如何与其他土地用途发生冲突,了解基于区域保护的社会生态共同利益和权衡,绘制威胁图,或确定基于区域和基于行为者的保护措施。此外,我们的框架还能通过揭示共性和社会生态差异实现跨区域学习,正如我们在此为世界热带干旱林地所展示的那样。通过弥合全球、自上而下和区域、自下而上的倡议之间的差距,我们的框架可以实现更符合实际情况的跨尺度可持续性规划,以及更有针对性和社会生态细致入微的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An actor-centered, scalable land system typology for addressing biodiversity loss in the world’s tropical dry woodlands

Land use is a key driver of the ongoing biodiversity crisis and therefore also a major opportunity for its mitigation. However, appropriately considering the diversity of land-use actors and activities in conservation assessments and planning is challenging. As a result, top-down conservation policy and planning are often criticized for a lack of contextual nuance widely acknowledged to be required for effective and just conservation action. To address these challenges, we have developed a conceptually consistent, scalable land system typology and demonstrated its usefulness for the world's tropical dry woodlands. Our typology identifies key land-use actors and activities that represent typical threats to biodiversity and opportunities for conservation action. We identified land systems in a hierarchical way, with a global level allowing for broad-scale planning and comparative work. Nested within it, a regionalized level provides social-ecological specificity and context. We showcase this regionalization for five hotspots of land-use change and biodiversity loss in dry woodlands in Argentina, Bolivia, Mozambique, India, and Cambodia. Unlike other approaches to present land use, our typology accounts for the complexity of overlapping land uses. This allows, for example, assessment of how conservation measures conflict with other land uses, understanding of the social-ecological co-benefits and trade-offs of area-based conservation, mapping of threats, or targeting area-based and actor-based conservation measures. Moreover, our framework enables cross-regional learning by revealing both commonalities and social-ecological differences, as we demonstrate here for the world's tropical dry woodlands. By bridging the gap between global, top-down, and regional, bottom-up initiatives, our framework enables more contextually appropriate sustainability planning across scales and more targeted and social-ecologically nuanced interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Environmental Change
Global Environmental Change 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
146
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Global Environmental Change is a prestigious international journal that publishes articles of high quality, both theoretically and empirically rigorous. The journal aims to contribute to the understanding of global environmental change from the perspectives of human and policy dimensions. Specifically, it considers global environmental change as the result of processes occurring at the local level, but with wide-ranging impacts on various spatial, temporal, and socio-political scales. In terms of content, the journal seeks articles with a strong social science component. This includes research that examines the societal drivers and consequences of environmental change, as well as social and policy processes that aim to address these challenges. While the journal covers a broad range of topics, including biodiversity and ecosystem services, climate, coasts, food systems, land use and land cover, oceans, urban areas, and water resources, it also welcomes contributions that investigate the drivers, consequences, and management of other areas affected by environmental change. Overall, Global Environmental Change encourages research that deepens our understanding of the complex interactions between human activities and the environment, with the goal of informing policy and decision-making.
期刊最新文献
Disruptive data: How access and benefit-sharing discourses structured ideas and decisions during the Convention on Biological Diversity negotiations over digital sequence information from 2016 to 2022 Does stricter sewage treatment targets policy exacerbate the contradiction between effluent water quality improvement and carbon emissions mitigation? An evidence from China Are energy transitions reproducing inequalities? Power, social stigma and distributive (in)justice in Mexico Climate beliefs, climate technologies and transformation pathways: Contextualizing public perceptions in 22 countries A new dynamic framework is required to assess adaptation limits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1