这不是我真正考虑的事情":家长对幼儿期提供多少食物的看法和做法

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Sensory Studies Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1111/joss.12917
Leticia Vidal, Gerónimo Brunet, Alejandra Girona, Leandro Machín, María R. Curutchet, Carolina de León, Gastón Ares
{"title":"这不是我真正考虑的事情\":家长对幼儿期提供多少食物的看法和做法","authors":"Leticia Vidal,&nbsp;Gerónimo Brunet,&nbsp;Alejandra Girona,&nbsp;Leandro Machín,&nbsp;María R. Curutchet,&nbsp;Carolina de León,&nbsp;Gastón Ares","doi":"10.1111/joss.12917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Children are born with an innate capacity to self-regulate their energy intake, but cues from the food environment can undermine children's self-regulation, promoting overconsumption, and challenging energy balance. The size of the portion offered by parents and caregivers has been shown to be correlated with how much food children consume, which is known as the portion size effect. Furthermore, some parental feeding practices may interfere with children's ability to self-regulate. The present research explored parents' perspectives and practices about how much food they offer to their children in Uruguay. Forty-two in-depth interviews with parents of children between 6 months and 5 years old were conducted. Results showed that parental decisions about portion sizes for their children were mostly unconscious and intuitive. Parents were unconcerned about portion sizes, mainly due to the belief that children are able to self-regulate. Although parents identified themselves as mainly responsible for deciding how much food to serve their children, the majority reported to be responsive when their child refuses to eat or finish their meal, or when they request to eat more. Coercive feeding practices were only mentioned by a minority of parents.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\n \n <p>Results from the present work stress the need to raise awareness of children's vulnerability to portion size effects, since portion size selection seems to be a highly arbitrary process. Further research is needed to identify the best approaches to disseminate information among parents and caregivers to promote appropriate portion sizes for children, as well as responsive feeding practices.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It's not something I really think about’: Parents' perspectives and practices about how much food to offer in early childhood\",\"authors\":\"Leticia Vidal,&nbsp;Gerónimo Brunet,&nbsp;Alejandra Girona,&nbsp;Leandro Machín,&nbsp;María R. Curutchet,&nbsp;Carolina de León,&nbsp;Gastón Ares\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joss.12917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <p>Children are born with an innate capacity to self-regulate their energy intake, but cues from the food environment can undermine children's self-regulation, promoting overconsumption, and challenging energy balance. The size of the portion offered by parents and caregivers has been shown to be correlated with how much food children consume, which is known as the portion size effect. Furthermore, some parental feeding practices may interfere with children's ability to self-regulate. The present research explored parents' perspectives and practices about how much food they offer to their children in Uruguay. Forty-two in-depth interviews with parents of children between 6 months and 5 years old were conducted. Results showed that parental decisions about portion sizes for their children were mostly unconscious and intuitive. Parents were unconcerned about portion sizes, mainly due to the belief that children are able to self-regulate. Although parents identified themselves as mainly responsible for deciding how much food to serve their children, the majority reported to be responsive when their child refuses to eat or finish their meal, or when they request to eat more. Coercive feeding practices were only mentioned by a minority of parents.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Practical Applications</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results from the present work stress the need to raise awareness of children's vulnerability to portion size effects, since portion size selection seems to be a highly arbitrary process. Further research is needed to identify the best approaches to disseminate information among parents and caregivers to promote appropriate portion sizes for children, as well as responsive feeding practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sensory Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12917\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.12917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童与生俱来就有自我调节能量摄入的能力,但来自食物环境的暗示可能会破坏儿童的自我调节能力,促进过度摄入,挑战能量平衡。事实证明,父母和照料者提供的食物分量与儿童摄入食物的多少有关,这就是所谓的分量效应。此外,父母的一些喂养方式可能会干扰儿童的自我调节能力。本研究探讨了乌拉圭家长对给孩子提供多少食物的看法和做法。研究人员对 42 名 6 个月至 5 岁儿童的家长进行了深入访谈。结果表明,家长对孩子食物分量的决定大多是无意识的、直观的。家长不关心孩子的饮食份量,主要是因为他们认为孩子能够自我调节。虽然家长认为自己主要负责决定给孩子提供多少食物,但大多数家长表示,当孩子拒绝进食或吃不完饭,或要求多吃时,他们会做出反应。只有少数家长提到强制喂养的做法。 实际应用 本研究的结果强调,有必要提高对儿童易受份量影响的认识,因为份量的选择似乎是一个非常随意的过程。我们需要进一步开展研究,以确定向家长和看护者传播信息的最佳方法,从而推广适合儿童的份量以及有针对性的喂养方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘It's not something I really think about’: Parents' perspectives and practices about how much food to offer in early childhood

Children are born with an innate capacity to self-regulate their energy intake, but cues from the food environment can undermine children's self-regulation, promoting overconsumption, and challenging energy balance. The size of the portion offered by parents and caregivers has been shown to be correlated with how much food children consume, which is known as the portion size effect. Furthermore, some parental feeding practices may interfere with children's ability to self-regulate. The present research explored parents' perspectives and practices about how much food they offer to their children in Uruguay. Forty-two in-depth interviews with parents of children between 6 months and 5 years old were conducted. Results showed that parental decisions about portion sizes for their children were mostly unconscious and intuitive. Parents were unconcerned about portion sizes, mainly due to the belief that children are able to self-regulate. Although parents identified themselves as mainly responsible for deciding how much food to serve their children, the majority reported to be responsive when their child refuses to eat or finish their meal, or when they request to eat more. Coercive feeding practices were only mentioned by a minority of parents.

Practical Applications

Results from the present work stress the need to raise awareness of children's vulnerability to portion size effects, since portion size selection seems to be a highly arbitrary process. Further research is needed to identify the best approaches to disseminate information among parents and caregivers to promote appropriate portion sizes for children, as well as responsive feeding practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Correction to “How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations” Rabitti, N. S., Appiani, M., Proserpio, C., Pagliarini, E., & Laureati, M. (2024). How do consumers with different food neophobia levels react to health and environmental information? A case study on legume-based formulations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 39(3), e12915. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12915 Displaying ingredients on healthy snack packaging: A study on visual attention, choice, and purchase intention Normative cortical activation patterns in children distinguishing one or two tactile sensory inputs points: An functional MRI study Pleasantness of fat flavor is decreased in young adults with high perceived stress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1