Paola Andrea Gallego Aristizabal , Tania Paola Lujan Chavarría , Sara Isabel Vergara Hernández , Federico Rincón Acosta , María Paula Sánchez Carmona , Paula Andrea Salazar Ospina , Carlos Jose Atencia Florez , Carlos Mario Barros Liñán , Fabián Jaimes
{"title":"在哥伦比亚麦德林的三个中心,对 COVID-19 患者死亡率的两个临床预测模型(4C 和 NEWS2)进行外部验证:评估疫苗接种的长期影响","authors":"Paola Andrea Gallego Aristizabal , Tania Paola Lujan Chavarría , Sara Isabel Vergara Hernández , Federico Rincón Acosta , María Paula Sánchez Carmona , Paula Andrea Salazar Ospina , Carlos Jose Atencia Florez , Carlos Mario Barros Liñán , Fabián Jaimes","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>External validation of the 4C and NEWS2 scores for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients, and evaluation of its operational performance in two time periods: before and after the start of the vaccination program in Colombia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort in three high complexity hospitals in the city of Medellín, Colombia, between June 2020 and April 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for the 4C mortality risk score and the NEWS2 were 0.75 (95% CI 0.73–0.78) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.66–0.71), respectively. For the 4C score, the AUC for the first and second periods was 0.77 (95% CI 0.74–0.80) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.78); whilst for the NEWS2 score, it was 0.68 (95% CI 0.65–0.71) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.64–0.73). The calibration for both scores was adequate, albeit with reduced performance during the second period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The 4C mortality risk score proved to be the more adequate predictor of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients in this Latin American population. The operational performance during both time periods remained similar, which shows its utility notwithstanding major changes, including vaccination, as the pandemic evolved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"54 5","pages":"Article 104921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000782/pdfft?md5=5cb197dbc079f4cabcfce636c26fe560&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000782-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of two clinical prediction models for mortality in COVID-19 patients (4C and NEWS2), in three centers in Medellín, Colombia: Assessing the impact of vaccination over time\",\"authors\":\"Paola Andrea Gallego Aristizabal , Tania Paola Lujan Chavarría , Sara Isabel Vergara Hernández , Federico Rincón Acosta , María Paula Sánchez Carmona , Paula Andrea Salazar Ospina , Carlos Jose Atencia Florez , Carlos Mario Barros Liñán , Fabián Jaimes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>External validation of the 4C and NEWS2 scores for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients, and evaluation of its operational performance in two time periods: before and after the start of the vaccination program in Colombia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective cohort in three high complexity hospitals in the city of Medellín, Colombia, between June 2020 and April 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for the 4C mortality risk score and the NEWS2 were 0.75 (95% CI 0.73–0.78) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.66–0.71), respectively. For the 4C score, the AUC for the first and second periods was 0.77 (95% CI 0.74–0.80) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.78); whilst for the NEWS2 score, it was 0.68 (95% CI 0.65–0.71) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.64–0.73). The calibration for both scores was adequate, albeit with reduced performance during the second period.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The 4C mortality risk score proved to be the more adequate predictor of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients in this Latin American population. The operational performance during both time periods remained similar, which shows its utility notwithstanding major changes, including vaccination, as the pandemic evolved.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases now\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 104921\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000782/pdfft?md5=5cb197dbc079f4cabcfce636c26fe560&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000782-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases now\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000782\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 对预测 COVID-19 患者院内死亡率的 4C 和 NEWS2 评分进行外部验证,并评估其在哥伦比亚疫苗接种计划开始之前和之后两个时间段的操作性能。结果 4C死亡率风险评分和NEWS2的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.75(95% CI 0.73-0.78)和0.68(95% CI 0.66-0.71)。对于 4C 评分,第一和第二阶段的 AUC 分别为 0.77(95% CI 0.74-0.80)和 0.75(95% CI 0.71-0.78);而对于 NEWS2 评分,AUC 分别为 0.68(95% CI 0.65-0.71)和 0.69(95% CI 0.64-0.73)。结论在拉丁美洲人群中,4C 死亡率风险评分被证明是预测 COVID-19 患者院内死亡率的更有效指标。两个时间段内的操作性能保持相似,这表明尽管随着大流行病的发展发生了包括疫苗接种在内的重大变化,该评分仍具有实用性。
External validation of two clinical prediction models for mortality in COVID-19 patients (4C and NEWS2), in three centers in Medellín, Colombia: Assessing the impact of vaccination over time
Objectives
External validation of the 4C and NEWS2 scores for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients, and evaluation of its operational performance in two time periods: before and after the start of the vaccination program in Colombia.
Methods
Retrospective cohort in three high complexity hospitals in the city of Medellín, Colombia, between June 2020 and April 2022.
Results
The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for the 4C mortality risk score and the NEWS2 were 0.75 (95% CI 0.73–0.78) and 0.68 (95% CI 0.66–0.71), respectively. For the 4C score, the AUC for the first and second periods was 0.77 (95% CI 0.74–0.80) and 0.75 (95% CI 0.71–0.78); whilst for the NEWS2 score, it was 0.68 (95% CI 0.65–0.71) and 0.69 (95% CI 0.64–0.73). The calibration for both scores was adequate, albeit with reduced performance during the second period.
Conclusions
The 4C mortality risk score proved to be the more adequate predictor of in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients in this Latin American population. The operational performance during both time periods remained similar, which shows its utility notwithstanding major changes, including vaccination, as the pandemic evolved.