加勒比地区一家私立医院开展非住院冠状动脉血管成形术的部分成本分析和经济影响

IF 1.4 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Value in health regional issues Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1016/j.vhri.2024.100988
Licurgo J. Cruz MD , Helio M. Grullón-Rodríguez MD , Yanely López-Bencosme MD , Sergio Gresse Jr. MPH , Yinny Cen Feng MD , Anthony Gutiérrez-Martínez MD, MSc
{"title":"加勒比地区一家私立医院开展非住院冠状动脉血管成形术的部分成本分析和经济影响","authors":"Licurgo J. Cruz MD ,&nbsp;Helio M. Grullón-Rodríguez MD ,&nbsp;Yanely López-Bencosme MD ,&nbsp;Sergio Gresse Jr. MPH ,&nbsp;Yinny Cen Feng MD ,&nbsp;Anthony Gutiérrez-Martínez MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.100988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to assess direct costs of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without hospital admission versus PCI with hospital admission longer than 24 hours in a private hospital-institutional perspective in the Dominican Republic in 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study has a comparative approach based on a prospective cross-sectional partial-cost analysis. We evaluated the direct costs of 10 patients from PCI without hospital admission approach and 10 patients from a hospital admission longer than 24 hours as a control group. We used a “first-come-first-served” approach from December 2021 to March 2022. The analysis used the electronic invoice generated for each patient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PCI without hospital admission approach represents $472.56 in patient savings, equivalent to a cost reduction of 12.5%. The subcosts analysis showed the pharmacy section as the main driver of the overall cost difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PCI without hospital admission was economically cost-saving compared with the control approach in direct costs in the Dominican perspective. The economic benefit is substantial and compliments the ease of use. This analysis may lead to improvements in institutional management of resources and can potentially be adapted to other health systems in the region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23497,"journal":{"name":"Value in health regional issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial-Cost Analysis and Economic Impact of Ambulatory Coronary Angioplasty in a Private Hospital in the Caribbean\",\"authors\":\"Licurgo J. Cruz MD ,&nbsp;Helio M. Grullón-Rodríguez MD ,&nbsp;Yanely López-Bencosme MD ,&nbsp;Sergio Gresse Jr. MPH ,&nbsp;Yinny Cen Feng MD ,&nbsp;Anthony Gutiérrez-Martínez MD, MSc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vhri.2024.100988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to assess direct costs of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without hospital admission versus PCI with hospital admission longer than 24 hours in a private hospital-institutional perspective in the Dominican Republic in 2022.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study has a comparative approach based on a prospective cross-sectional partial-cost analysis. We evaluated the direct costs of 10 patients from PCI without hospital admission approach and 10 patients from a hospital admission longer than 24 hours as a control group. We used a “first-come-first-served” approach from December 2021 to March 2022. The analysis used the electronic invoice generated for each patient.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>PCI without hospital admission approach represents $472.56 in patient savings, equivalent to a cost reduction of 12.5%. The subcosts analysis showed the pharmacy section as the main driver of the overall cost difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PCI without hospital admission was economically cost-saving compared with the control approach in direct costs in the Dominican perspective. The economic benefit is substantial and compliments the ease of use. This analysis may lead to improvements in institutional management of resources and can potentially be adapted to other health systems in the region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in health regional issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in health regional issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212109924000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估 2022 年多米尼加共和国私立医院-机构视角下未经入院的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 (PCI) 与入院时间超过 24 小时的 PCI 的直接成本。我们评估了 10 名未住院的 PCI 患者和 10 名住院超过 24 小时的对照组患者的直接成本。我们在 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 3 月期间采用了 "先到先得 "的方法。分析使用了为每位患者生成的电子发票。结果不住院行冠脉介入治疗为患者节省了 472.56 美元,相当于降低了 12.5% 的成本。子成本分析表明,药房部分是造成总体成本差异的主要原因。结论从多米尼加的角度来看,与对照方法相比,不住院的 PCI 方法在直接成本方面节省了经济成本。经济效益显著,且易于使用。这项分析可能会改善机构对资源的管理,并有可能应用于该地区的其他医疗系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Partial-Cost Analysis and Economic Impact of Ambulatory Coronary Angioplasty in a Private Hospital in the Caribbean

Objectives

This study aimed to assess direct costs of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) without hospital admission versus PCI with hospital admission longer than 24 hours in a private hospital-institutional perspective in the Dominican Republic in 2022.

Methods

This study has a comparative approach based on a prospective cross-sectional partial-cost analysis. We evaluated the direct costs of 10 patients from PCI without hospital admission approach and 10 patients from a hospital admission longer than 24 hours as a control group. We used a “first-come-first-served” approach from December 2021 to March 2022. The analysis used the electronic invoice generated for each patient.

Results

PCI without hospital admission approach represents $472.56 in patient savings, equivalent to a cost reduction of 12.5%. The subcosts analysis showed the pharmacy section as the main driver of the overall cost difference.

Conclusions

PCI without hospital admission was economically cost-saving compared with the control approach in direct costs in the Dominican perspective. The economic benefit is substantial and compliments the ease of use. This analysis may lead to improvements in institutional management of resources and can potentially be adapted to other health systems in the region.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in health regional issues
Value in health regional issues Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
127
期刊最新文献
Understanding What Matters: Stakeholder Views on Decision Criteria for Cancer Drug Selection in the Public Sector in Malaysia. Postpartum Screening for Type 2 Diabetes in Women With a History of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Singapore Cost-Utility Analysis of Dose-Dense Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in Comparison With Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Chemotherapy Regimen in the Treatment of Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer in Iran. Editorial Board Table of Contents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1