Thomas Flegel, Katharina Dobersek, Sabrina Bayer, Lisa F. Becker, Shenja Loderstedt, Irene C. Böttcher, Josephine Dietzel, Carina Tästensen, Theresa Kalliwoda, Marie A. Harkenthal, Andreas Kühnapfel, Vivian Weiß, Sarah Gutmann
{"title":"客户了解兽医神经转诊中心对小动物的指示","authors":"Thomas Flegel, Katharina Dobersek, Sabrina Bayer, Lisa F. Becker, Shenja Loderstedt, Irene C. Böttcher, Josephine Dietzel, Carina Tästensen, Theresa Kalliwoda, Marie A. Harkenthal, Andreas Kühnapfel, Vivian Weiß, Sarah Gutmann","doi":"10.1111/jvim.17085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>It is not known how much information clients retrieve from discharge instructions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate client's understanding of discharge instructions and influencing factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Dogs and cats being hospitalized for neurological diseases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Clients were presented questionnaires regarding their pet's disease, diagnostics, treatments, prognosis and discharge instructions at time of discharge and 2 weeks later. The same questions were answered by discharging veterinarians at time of discharge. Clients answered additional questions regarding the subjective feelings during discharge conversation. Data collected included: data describing discharging veterinarian (age, gender, years of clinical experience, specialist status), data describing the client (age, gender, educational status). Raw percentage of agreement (RPA) between answers of clinicians and clients as well as factors potentially influencing the RPA were evaluated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 230 clients being approached 151 (65.7%) and 70 (30.4%) clients responded to the first and second questionnaire, respectively (130 dog and 30 cat owners). The general RPA between clinician's and client's responses over all questions together was 68.9% and 66.8% at the 2 time points. Questions regarding adverse effects of medication (29.0%), residual clinical signs (35.8%), and confinement instructions (36.8%) had the lowest RPAs at the first time point. The age of clients (<i>P</i> = .008) negatively influenced RPAs, with clients older than 50 years having lower RPA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\n \n <p>Clients can only partially reproduce information provided at discharge. Only clients' increasing age influenced recall of information. Instructions deemed to be important should be specifically stressed during discharge.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"38 3","pages":"1639-1650"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.17085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Client's understanding of instructions for small animals in a veterinary neurological referral center\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Flegel, Katharina Dobersek, Sabrina Bayer, Lisa F. Becker, Shenja Loderstedt, Irene C. Böttcher, Josephine Dietzel, Carina Tästensen, Theresa Kalliwoda, Marie A. Harkenthal, Andreas Kühnapfel, Vivian Weiß, Sarah Gutmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jvim.17085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>It is not known how much information clients retrieve from discharge instructions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate client's understanding of discharge instructions and influencing factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Animals</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dogs and cats being hospitalized for neurological diseases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clients were presented questionnaires regarding their pet's disease, diagnostics, treatments, prognosis and discharge instructions at time of discharge and 2 weeks later. The same questions were answered by discharging veterinarians at time of discharge. Clients answered additional questions regarding the subjective feelings during discharge conversation. Data collected included: data describing discharging veterinarian (age, gender, years of clinical experience, specialist status), data describing the client (age, gender, educational status). Raw percentage of agreement (RPA) between answers of clinicians and clients as well as factors potentially influencing the RPA were evaluated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 230 clients being approached 151 (65.7%) and 70 (30.4%) clients responded to the first and second questionnaire, respectively (130 dog and 30 cat owners). The general RPA between clinician's and client's responses over all questions together was 68.9% and 66.8% at the 2 time points. Questions regarding adverse effects of medication (29.0%), residual clinical signs (35.8%), and confinement instructions (36.8%) had the lowest RPAs at the first time point. The age of clients (<i>P</i> = .008) negatively influenced RPAs, with clients older than 50 years having lower RPA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clients can only partially reproduce information provided at discharge. Only clients' increasing age influenced recall of information. Instructions deemed to be important should be specifically stressed during discharge.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"1639-1650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.17085\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.17085\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.17085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Client's understanding of instructions for small animals in a veterinary neurological referral center
Background
It is not known how much information clients retrieve from discharge instructions.
Objective
To investigate client's understanding of discharge instructions and influencing factors.
Animals
Dogs and cats being hospitalized for neurological diseases.
Methods
Clients were presented questionnaires regarding their pet's disease, diagnostics, treatments, prognosis and discharge instructions at time of discharge and 2 weeks later. The same questions were answered by discharging veterinarians at time of discharge. Clients answered additional questions regarding the subjective feelings during discharge conversation. Data collected included: data describing discharging veterinarian (age, gender, years of clinical experience, specialist status), data describing the client (age, gender, educational status). Raw percentage of agreement (RPA) between answers of clinicians and clients as well as factors potentially influencing the RPA were evaluated.
Results
Of 230 clients being approached 151 (65.7%) and 70 (30.4%) clients responded to the first and second questionnaire, respectively (130 dog and 30 cat owners). The general RPA between clinician's and client's responses over all questions together was 68.9% and 66.8% at the 2 time points. Questions regarding adverse effects of medication (29.0%), residual clinical signs (35.8%), and confinement instructions (36.8%) had the lowest RPAs at the first time point. The age of clients (P = .008) negatively influenced RPAs, with clients older than 50 years having lower RPA.
Conclusions and Clinical Importance
Clients can only partially reproduce information provided at discharge. Only clients' increasing age influenced recall of information. Instructions deemed to be important should be specifically stressed during discharge.
期刊介绍:
The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.