社会环境对大麻使用者的主观价值。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1037/pha0000717
Thomas P Shellenberg, Justin C Strickland, Cecilia L Bergeria, Sean D Regnier, William W Stoops, Joshua A Lile
{"title":"社会环境对大麻使用者的主观价值。","authors":"Thomas P Shellenberg, Justin C Strickland, Cecilia L Bergeria, Sean D Regnier, William W Stoops, Joshua A Lile","doi":"10.1037/pha0000717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disordered cannabis use is linked to social problems, which could be explained by a subjective devaluation of nondrug social contexts and/or an overvaluation of cannabis-paired options relative to nondrug alternatives. To examine these hypotheses, measures to assess the subjective value of social- and/or cannabis-paired contexts were collected in people who use cannabis (<i>n</i> = 85) and controls (<i>n</i> = 98) using crowdsourcing methods. Measures included a cued concurrent choice task that presented two images (cannabis, social, social cannabis, and neutral images) paired with monetary options, hypothetical purchase tasks that included access to social parties with and without a cannabis \"open bar,\" and the Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS). Little evidence was found to suggest that the cannabis group undervalued social contexts. People who used cannabis demonstrated a preference for social- versus neutral-cued options, and no preference for cannabis- versus social cannabis-cued options on the choice task. In addition, social party demand and SAS scores did not differ between groups. In contrast, we observed evidence for an overvaluation of cannabis context in people who use cannabis, including preference for social cannabis- versus social-cued options, and more disadvantageous choices for cannabis-cued options on the choice task, as well as more intense and inelastic demand for the social cannabis party compared to the social party. These results suggest that social problems associated with cannabis use could be at least partially explained by an overvaluation of cannabis-paired options, rather than devaluation of nondrug social-paired options, in the value calculations underlying drug use decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The subjective value of social context in people who use cannabis.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P Shellenberg, Justin C Strickland, Cecilia L Bergeria, Sean D Regnier, William W Stoops, Joshua A Lile\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pha0000717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Disordered cannabis use is linked to social problems, which could be explained by a subjective devaluation of nondrug social contexts and/or an overvaluation of cannabis-paired options relative to nondrug alternatives. To examine these hypotheses, measures to assess the subjective value of social- and/or cannabis-paired contexts were collected in people who use cannabis (<i>n</i> = 85) and controls (<i>n</i> = 98) using crowdsourcing methods. Measures included a cued concurrent choice task that presented two images (cannabis, social, social cannabis, and neutral images) paired with monetary options, hypothetical purchase tasks that included access to social parties with and without a cannabis \\\"open bar,\\\" and the Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS). Little evidence was found to suggest that the cannabis group undervalued social contexts. People who used cannabis demonstrated a preference for social- versus neutral-cued options, and no preference for cannabis- versus social cannabis-cued options on the choice task. In addition, social party demand and SAS scores did not differ between groups. In contrast, we observed evidence for an overvaluation of cannabis context in people who use cannabis, including preference for social cannabis- versus social-cued options, and more disadvantageous choices for cannabis-cued options on the choice task, as well as more intense and inelastic demand for the social cannabis party compared to the social party. These results suggest that social problems associated with cannabis use could be at least partially explained by an overvaluation of cannabis-paired options, rather than devaluation of nondrug social-paired options, in the value calculations underlying drug use decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":12089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大麻的无序使用与社会问题有关,其原因可能是对非毒品社会环境的主观贬低和/或相对于非毒品选择而言对与大麻配对的选择的高估。为了验证这些假设,我们采用众包方法收集了大麻使用者(85 人)和对照组(98 人)的数据,以评估社交和/或大麻配对情境的主观价值。测量方法包括提示并发选择任务(呈现两种图像(大麻、社交、社交大麻和中性图像)与货币选项配对)、假设购买任务(包括参加有大麻 "开放酒吧 "和没有大麻 "开放酒吧 "的社交派对)和社交厌恶量表(SAS)。几乎没有证据表明大麻组低估了社交环境的价值。在选择任务中,吸食大麻的人表现出对社交与中性提示选项的偏好,而对大麻与社交大麻提示选项没有偏好。此外,社交聚会需求和 SAS 分数在各组之间没有差异。与此相反,我们观察到的证据表明,吸食大麻的人高估了大麻的背景,包括偏好社交大麻选项而非社交提示选项,在选择任务中对大麻提示选项的选择更不利,以及与社交派对相比,对社交大麻派对的需求更强烈且缺乏弹性。这些结果表明,与吸食大麻有关的社会问题至少可以部分地解释为,在毒品使用决策的价值计算中,高估了与大麻配对的选项,而不是贬低了与非毒品社交配对的选项。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The subjective value of social context in people who use cannabis.
Disordered cannabis use is linked to social problems, which could be explained by a subjective devaluation of nondrug social contexts and/or an overvaluation of cannabis-paired options relative to nondrug alternatives. To examine these hypotheses, measures to assess the subjective value of social- and/or cannabis-paired contexts were collected in people who use cannabis (n = 85) and controls (n = 98) using crowdsourcing methods. Measures included a cued concurrent choice task that presented two images (cannabis, social, social cannabis, and neutral images) paired with monetary options, hypothetical purchase tasks that included access to social parties with and without a cannabis "open bar," and the Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS). Little evidence was found to suggest that the cannabis group undervalued social contexts. People who used cannabis demonstrated a preference for social- versus neutral-cued options, and no preference for cannabis- versus social cannabis-cued options on the choice task. In addition, social party demand and SAS scores did not differ between groups. In contrast, we observed evidence for an overvaluation of cannabis context in people who use cannabis, including preference for social cannabis- versus social-cued options, and more disadvantageous choices for cannabis-cued options on the choice task, as well as more intense and inelastic demand for the social cannabis party compared to the social party. These results suggest that social problems associated with cannabis use could be at least partially explained by an overvaluation of cannabis-paired options, rather than devaluation of nondrug social-paired options, in the value calculations underlying drug use decisions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the human abuse potential of concurrent use of electronic cigarettes and low nicotine cigarettes among adults who smoke. Residual next-day effects of alprazolam on psychomotor performance and simulated driving in healthy normal adults. Efficacy and safety of balovaptan for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A behavioral choice analysis of the role of life events during early nonabstinent natural recovery from alcohol use disorder. An experimental investigation into the impact of acute stress on alcohol craving.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1