估算能效政策和措施效果的紧凑型元模型

IF 3.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Energy Efficiency Pub Date : 2024-04-30 DOI:10.1007/s12053-024-10222-z
Igor Bashmakov, Anna Myshak, Vladmir Bashmakov, Konstantin Borisov, Maxim Dzedzichek, Alexey Lunin, Oleg Lebedev, Tatiana Shishkina
{"title":"估算能效政策和措施效果的紧凑型元模型","authors":"Igor Bashmakov,&nbsp;Anna Myshak,&nbsp;Vladmir Bashmakov,&nbsp;Konstantin Borisov,&nbsp;Maxim Dzedzichek,&nbsp;Alexey Lunin,&nbsp;Oleg Lebedev,&nbsp;Tatiana Shishkina","doi":"10.1007/s12053-024-10222-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Decision-makers want to be reliably advised on the implications of the decisions they make. Very sophisticated models, which decision-makers are often unfamiliar with, are typically used to provide such assessments for large and complex systems. However, even having access to these models, decision-makers can rarely handle them. A model is best known to its developers, who, therefore, need to be contracted to estimate the effects of the proposed policies. This takes time and money, yet leaves the credibility of the results questionable in countries with a limited culture of cooperation between decision-makers and a modeling community. One possible, yet partial, solution is to use an ensemble of models. Another option is to use a set of compact meta-models to address specific policies and measures; the parameters of such compact models can be assessed using other, large and complex, models. Decision-makers can run these simple compact models on their own to make policy dialogue more operational and to have more confidence in the results. This paper presents one such model, which consists of 95 compact sub-models designed to outline comprehensive energy efficiency programs, along with the results of its pilot application for an illustrative set of policies. This application has shown, that such models may serve as an effective tool for a prompt policy dialogue with all stakeholders in compiling the policy package to untap the most of the available energy efficiency potential to meet sector-specific or economy-wide goals in terms of energy savings or energy intensity reduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":537,"journal":{"name":"Energy Efficiency","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compact meta-models to estimate the effects of energy efficiency policies and measures\",\"authors\":\"Igor Bashmakov,&nbsp;Anna Myshak,&nbsp;Vladmir Bashmakov,&nbsp;Konstantin Borisov,&nbsp;Maxim Dzedzichek,&nbsp;Alexey Lunin,&nbsp;Oleg Lebedev,&nbsp;Tatiana Shishkina\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12053-024-10222-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Decision-makers want to be reliably advised on the implications of the decisions they make. Very sophisticated models, which decision-makers are often unfamiliar with, are typically used to provide such assessments for large and complex systems. However, even having access to these models, decision-makers can rarely handle them. A model is best known to its developers, who, therefore, need to be contracted to estimate the effects of the proposed policies. This takes time and money, yet leaves the credibility of the results questionable in countries with a limited culture of cooperation between decision-makers and a modeling community. One possible, yet partial, solution is to use an ensemble of models. Another option is to use a set of compact meta-models to address specific policies and measures; the parameters of such compact models can be assessed using other, large and complex, models. Decision-makers can run these simple compact models on their own to make policy dialogue more operational and to have more confidence in the results. This paper presents one such model, which consists of 95 compact sub-models designed to outline comprehensive energy efficiency programs, along with the results of its pilot application for an illustrative set of policies. This application has shown, that such models may serve as an effective tool for a prompt policy dialogue with all stakeholders in compiling the policy package to untap the most of the available energy efficiency potential to meet sector-specific or economy-wide goals in terms of energy savings or energy intensity reduction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"volume\":\"17 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Efficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10222-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Efficiency","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12053-024-10222-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

决策者希望就他们所做决定的影响得到可靠的建议。决策者通常不熟悉非常复杂的模型,而这些模型通常用于为大型复杂系统提供此类评估。然而,即使能够获得这些模型,决策者也很少能够处理它们。模型的开发者最了解模型,因此需要与开发者签订合同,以估算建议政策的影响。这需要时间和金钱,但在决策者与建模界合作文化有限的国家,结果的可信度却值得怀疑。一个可能的但只是部分的解决方案是使用模型组合。另一种方法是使用一套紧凑的元模型来处理具体的政策和措施;这些紧凑模型的参数可以使用其他大型复杂模型进行评估。决策者可以自行运行这些简单的紧凑型模型,使政策对话更具可操作性,并对结果更有信心。本文介绍了一个这样的模型,该模型由 95 个紧凑型子模型组成,旨在概述综合能效计划,并介绍了该模型在一套说明性政策中的试点应用结果。应用结果表明,这种模型可以作为一种有效的工具,与所有利益相关者进行及时的政策对话,以编制一揽子政策,最大限度地挖掘现有的能效潜力,实现特定行业或整个经济的节能或降低能源强度的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compact meta-models to estimate the effects of energy efficiency policies and measures

Decision-makers want to be reliably advised on the implications of the decisions they make. Very sophisticated models, which decision-makers are often unfamiliar with, are typically used to provide such assessments for large and complex systems. However, even having access to these models, decision-makers can rarely handle them. A model is best known to its developers, who, therefore, need to be contracted to estimate the effects of the proposed policies. This takes time and money, yet leaves the credibility of the results questionable in countries with a limited culture of cooperation between decision-makers and a modeling community. One possible, yet partial, solution is to use an ensemble of models. Another option is to use a set of compact meta-models to address specific policies and measures; the parameters of such compact models can be assessed using other, large and complex, models. Decision-makers can run these simple compact models on their own to make policy dialogue more operational and to have more confidence in the results. This paper presents one such model, which consists of 95 compact sub-models designed to outline comprehensive energy efficiency programs, along with the results of its pilot application for an illustrative set of policies. This application has shown, that such models may serve as an effective tool for a prompt policy dialogue with all stakeholders in compiling the policy package to untap the most of the available energy efficiency potential to meet sector-specific or economy-wide goals in terms of energy savings or energy intensity reduction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Efficiency
Energy Efficiency ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.50%
发文量
59
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Efficiency covers wide-ranging aspects of energy efficiency in the residential, tertiary, industrial and transport sectors. Coverage includes a number of different topics and disciplines including energy efficiency policies at local, regional, national and international levels; long term impact of energy efficiency; technologies to improve energy efficiency; consumer behavior and the dynamics of consumption; socio-economic impacts of energy efficiency measures; energy efficiency as a virtual utility; transportation issues; building issues; energy management systems and energy services; energy planning and risk assessment; energy efficiency in developing countries and economies in transition; non-energy benefits of energy efficiency and opportunities for policy integration; energy education and training, and emerging technologies. See Aims and Scope for more details.
期刊最新文献
A step towards energy efficiency in G7 countries: analyzing the role of economic complexity and shadow economy on energy intensity Pathways to commercial building plug and process load efficiency and control Wind-driven and buoyancy effects for modeling natural ventilation in buildings at urban scale A mixed-method approach to study the impacts of energy micro-generation combined with appliance-level feedback on everyday practices Do environment-related technologies, urbanization, trade openness, and income impact energy consumption and intensity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1