{"title":"土耳其版血液透析患者复原力量表的有效性和可靠性","authors":"Çiğdem Özdemir Eler, Sultan Kav","doi":"10.1111/1744-9987.14138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThe study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the hemodialysis resilience scale (PHRS) in the Turkish population.MethodsA cross‐sectional methodologic study involved 136 hemodialysis patients at two dialysis centers affiliated with a foundation university in Turkey. The updated guidelines for the Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language, and Culture Adaptation were followed.ResultsCronbach's α of the PHRS‐Tr was 0.94. A three‐factor structure was extracted, namely “the pursuit of positive meaning in the present,” “building the will to live through close human relationships,” and “acceptance of hemodialysis as a part of daily life” explaining 66.82% of the total variance. Test–retest reliability was conducted with 50 patients within the sample 2 weeks after the first application. The correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability was <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.680.ConclusionThe study results indicate that the PHRS‐Tr is a valid and reliable tool for assessing resilience status in Turkish hemodialysis patients.","PeriodicalId":23021,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient on hemodialysis resilience scale\",\"authors\":\"Çiğdem Özdemir Eler, Sultan Kav\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-9987.14138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionThe study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the hemodialysis resilience scale (PHRS) in the Turkish population.MethodsA cross‐sectional methodologic study involved 136 hemodialysis patients at two dialysis centers affiliated with a foundation university in Turkey. The updated guidelines for the Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language, and Culture Adaptation were followed.ResultsCronbach's α of the PHRS‐Tr was 0.94. A three‐factor structure was extracted, namely “the pursuit of positive meaning in the present,” “building the will to live through close human relationships,” and “acceptance of hemodialysis as a part of daily life” explaining 66.82% of the total variance. Test–retest reliability was conducted with 50 patients within the sample 2 weeks after the first application. The correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability was <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.680.ConclusionThe study results indicate that the PHRS‐Tr is a valid and reliable tool for assessing resilience status in Turkish hemodialysis patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-9987.14138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the patient on hemodialysis resilience scale
IntroductionThe study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the hemodialysis resilience scale (PHRS) in the Turkish population.MethodsA cross‐sectional methodologic study involved 136 hemodialysis patients at two dialysis centers affiliated with a foundation university in Turkey. The updated guidelines for the Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language, and Culture Adaptation were followed.ResultsCronbach's α of the PHRS‐Tr was 0.94. A three‐factor structure was extracted, namely “the pursuit of positive meaning in the present,” “building the will to live through close human relationships,” and “acceptance of hemodialysis as a part of daily life” explaining 66.82% of the total variance. Test–retest reliability was conducted with 50 patients within the sample 2 weeks after the first application. The correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability was r = 0.680.ConclusionThe study results indicate that the PHRS‐Tr is a valid and reliable tool for assessing resilience status in Turkish hemodialysis patients.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis is the official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. The Journal publishes original articles, editorial comments, review articles, case reports, meeting abstracts and Communications information on apheresis and dialysis technologies and treatments.