性别配额、妇女参政和教育中的性别均等

IF 1.5 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics & Politics Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1111/ecpo.12287
Alex O. Acheampong, Eric Evans Osei Opoku, Niharika Rustagi
{"title":"性别配额、妇女参政和教育中的性别均等","authors":"Alex O. Acheampong,&nbsp;Eric Evans Osei Opoku,&nbsp;Niharika Rustagi","doi":"10.1111/ecpo.12287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Do women in politics contribute to gender parity in education? This study seeks to provide an empirical answer to this question by examining whether women in politics (women parliamentarians) contribute to closing the gender inequality in education using a global sample of 191 countries from 1990 to 2020. We deployed the two-stage least square (IV-TSLS) technique and gender quota as an instrument to isolate the exogenous effect of women in politics on gender parity in primary, secondary and tertiary education. The findings from the IV-TSLS estimators show that an increase in the number of female parliamentarians is associated with a significant increase in gender parity at all levels of education. These results survived several robustness checks, including using different estimators such as the Lewbel two-stage least squares and the Kinky least-squares estimators. Based on the quota type, we documented that women in politics significantly spur gender parity in education in countries with reserved seat quotas and not in countries with candidate quotas. We also found that the results differ across different geographical regions and income groups. The findings call on policy-makers to address societal, legal and structural barriers limiting women's political participation to achieve gender parity at all levels of education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47220,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Politics","volume":"36 3","pages":"1223-1260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecpo.12287","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender quota, women in politics, and gender parity in education\",\"authors\":\"Alex O. Acheampong,&nbsp;Eric Evans Osei Opoku,&nbsp;Niharika Rustagi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecpo.12287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Do women in politics contribute to gender parity in education? This study seeks to provide an empirical answer to this question by examining whether women in politics (women parliamentarians) contribute to closing the gender inequality in education using a global sample of 191 countries from 1990 to 2020. We deployed the two-stage least square (IV-TSLS) technique and gender quota as an instrument to isolate the exogenous effect of women in politics on gender parity in primary, secondary and tertiary education. The findings from the IV-TSLS estimators show that an increase in the number of female parliamentarians is associated with a significant increase in gender parity at all levels of education. These results survived several robustness checks, including using different estimators such as the Lewbel two-stage least squares and the Kinky least-squares estimators. Based on the quota type, we documented that women in politics significantly spur gender parity in education in countries with reserved seat quotas and not in countries with candidate quotas. We also found that the results differ across different geographical regions and income groups. The findings call on policy-makers to address societal, legal and structural barriers limiting women's political participation to achieve gender parity at all levels of education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Politics\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"1223-1260\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecpo.12287\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.12287\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecpo.12287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从政女性是否有助于实现教育领域的性别均等?本研究以 1990 年至 2020 年全球 191 个国家为样本,考察了从政女性(女议员)是否有助于消除教育领域的性别不平等现象,旨在为这一问题提供实证答案。我们采用了两阶段最小二乘法(IV-TSLS)技术,并将性别配额作为工具,以分离女性参政对初等、中等和高等教育性别均等的外生影响。IV-TSLS 估计的结果表明,女议员人数的增加与各级教育中性别均等程度的显著提高有关。这些结果经受住了多次稳健性检验,包括使用不同的估计方法,如 Lewbel 两阶段最小二乘法和 Kinky 最小二乘法估计方法。根据配额类型,我们发现在实行保留席位配额制的国家,从政女性显著促进了教育领域的性别均等,而在实行候选人配额制的国家则没有。我们还发现,不同地理区域和收入群体的结果也不尽相同。研究结果呼吁政策制定者解决限制妇女参政的社会、法律和结构性障碍,以实现各级教育中的性别均等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender quota, women in politics, and gender parity in education

Do women in politics contribute to gender parity in education? This study seeks to provide an empirical answer to this question by examining whether women in politics (women parliamentarians) contribute to closing the gender inequality in education using a global sample of 191 countries from 1990 to 2020. We deployed the two-stage least square (IV-TSLS) technique and gender quota as an instrument to isolate the exogenous effect of women in politics on gender parity in primary, secondary and tertiary education. The findings from the IV-TSLS estimators show that an increase in the number of female parliamentarians is associated with a significant increase in gender parity at all levels of education. These results survived several robustness checks, including using different estimators such as the Lewbel two-stage least squares and the Kinky least-squares estimators. Based on the quota type, we documented that women in politics significantly spur gender parity in education in countries with reserved seat quotas and not in countries with candidate quotas. We also found that the results differ across different geographical regions and income groups. The findings call on policy-makers to address societal, legal and structural barriers limiting women's political participation to achieve gender parity at all levels of education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Economics & Politics focuses on analytical political economy, broadly defined as the study of economic and political phenomena and policy in models that include political processes, institutions and markets. The journal is the source for innovative theoretical and empirical work on the intersection of politics and economics, at both domestic and international levels, and aims to promote new approaches on how these forces interact to affect political outcomes and policy choices, economic performance and societal welfare. Economics & Politics is a vital source of information for economists, academics and students, providing: - Analytical political economics - International scholarship - Accessible & thought-provoking articles - Creative inter-disciplinary analysis
期刊最新文献
Issue Information What causes polarized stagnation, corporate economy, or welfare state?: Insights from new development economics The effects of non‐trade non‐rent barriers on intra‐Africa trade Patriarchy, pandemics, and the gendered resource curse thesis: Evidence from petroleum geology How does oil policy uncertainty influence resource rents? New empirical evidence from Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1