养老院居民的偏好和生活质量:混合方法研究

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of gerontological nursing Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3928/00989134-20240416-02
Tonya Roberts, PhD, RN, Laura Block, BS, BSN, RN, Caroline Madrigal, PhD, RN
{"title":"养老院居民的偏好和生活质量:混合方法研究","authors":"Tonya Roberts, PhD, RN, Laura Block, BS, BSN, RN, Caroline Madrigal, PhD, RN","doi":"10.3928/00989134-20240416-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<section><h3>Purpose:</h3><p>Delivery of person-centered care (PCC) is the standard in nursing homes (NHs) and demonstrates a positive impact on resident quality of life (QOL). PCC inherently recognizes and prioritizes resident preferences; however, preferences, and their degree of importance among residents, demonstrate a variable relationship with QOL that remains underexplored. Therefore, the current study examined the association between preferences and QOL among NH residents.</p></section><section><h3>Method:</h3><p>A mixed methods study incorporating surveys was conducted among 144 residents, with semi-structured follow-up interviews with 11 residents.</p></section><section><h3>Results:</h3><p>Findings confirm a variable relationship between resident preferences and QOL. Higher order preferences not captured within the preference assessment may influence QOL. High numbers of unimportant and <i>can't do</i>/<i>no</i> choice preferences were linked to resident acclimatization to the NH. QOL was at risk if care was not consistent with preferences.</p></section><section><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>In-depth assessments and robust measures of preferences and QOL should be integrated into care delivery and future research. [<i>Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50</i>(5), 7–13.]</p></section>","PeriodicalId":15848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gerontological nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preferences and Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Mixed Methods Study\",\"authors\":\"Tonya Roberts, PhD, RN, Laura Block, BS, BSN, RN, Caroline Madrigal, PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/00989134-20240416-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<section><h3>Purpose:</h3><p>Delivery of person-centered care (PCC) is the standard in nursing homes (NHs) and demonstrates a positive impact on resident quality of life (QOL). PCC inherently recognizes and prioritizes resident preferences; however, preferences, and their degree of importance among residents, demonstrate a variable relationship with QOL that remains underexplored. Therefore, the current study examined the association between preferences and QOL among NH residents.</p></section><section><h3>Method:</h3><p>A mixed methods study incorporating surveys was conducted among 144 residents, with semi-structured follow-up interviews with 11 residents.</p></section><section><h3>Results:</h3><p>Findings confirm a variable relationship between resident preferences and QOL. Higher order preferences not captured within the preference assessment may influence QOL. High numbers of unimportant and <i>can't do</i>/<i>no</i> choice preferences were linked to resident acclimatization to the NH. QOL was at risk if care was not consistent with preferences.</p></section><section><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>In-depth assessments and robust measures of preferences and QOL should be integrated into care delivery and future research. [<i>Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50</i>(5), 7–13.]</p></section>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of gerontological nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of gerontological nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20240416-02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gerontological nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20240416-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提供以人为本的护理(PCC)是疗养院(NHs)的标准,并对住院者的生活质量(QOL)产生了积极影响。以人为本的护理本质上承认并优先考虑住户的偏好;然而,住户的偏好及其重要程度与生活质量之间存在着不同的关系,这一点尚未得到充分探讨。因此,本研究考察了北卡罗来纳州居民的偏好与 QOL 之间的关系。方法:本研究采用混合方法,对 144 名居民进行了调查,并对 11 名居民进行了半结构化的后续访谈。偏好评估中未包含的高阶偏好可能会影响 QOL。不重要和不能做/没有选择的偏好较多,这与住户是否适应疗养院有关。结论:应将对偏好和 QOL 的深入评估和可靠测量纳入护理服务和未来研究中。[老年护理杂志》,50(5),7-13。]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preferences and Quality of Life in Nursing Home Residents: A Mixed Methods Study

Purpose:

Delivery of person-centered care (PCC) is the standard in nursing homes (NHs) and demonstrates a positive impact on resident quality of life (QOL). PCC inherently recognizes and prioritizes resident preferences; however, preferences, and their degree of importance among residents, demonstrate a variable relationship with QOL that remains underexplored. Therefore, the current study examined the association between preferences and QOL among NH residents.

Method:

A mixed methods study incorporating surveys was conducted among 144 residents, with semi-structured follow-up interviews with 11 residents.

Results:

Findings confirm a variable relationship between resident preferences and QOL. Higher order preferences not captured within the preference assessment may influence QOL. High numbers of unimportant and can't do/no choice preferences were linked to resident acclimatization to the NH. QOL was at risk if care was not consistent with preferences.

Conclusion:

In-depth assessments and robust measures of preferences and QOL should be integrated into care delivery and future research. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50(5), 7–13.]

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontological Nursing is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing clinically relevant original articles on the practice of gerontological nursing across the continuum of care in a variety of health care settings, for more than 40 years.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Family Caregivers of Older Adults With Dementia in Korea During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis. Feasibility of Fall-Risk Detection in Older Adults: Real-World Use of Sensor Data With Machine Learning. Feasibility of Whole-Body Resistance Training With Social Support Reinforcement for Older Adults Living Alone: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study. Gerontological Nurses' Civic Duty: Impact of November's Election on Rural Health and Older Adults. Nurses' Provision of Sexual and Reproductive Health to Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An Integrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1