十字路口的十字路口克里斯-沃森和菲利普-杰克的《奥克斯马代克

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERARY REVIEWS CRITICAL QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1111/criq.12782
Adam Maric-Cleaver
{"title":"十字路口的十字路口克里斯-沃森和菲利普-杰克的《奥克斯马代克","authors":"Adam Maric-Cleaver","doi":"10.1111/criq.12782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Oxmardyke</i> is named for a now defunct Yorkshire rail crossing. In 2017, sound recordist Chris Watson set up microphones alongside the tracks of the Hull Line, initially to record a freight train. But Watson soon began making multiple recordings from around the site over several weeks. The late Philip Jeck, turntablist, composer, and artist, would twist these recordings into <i>Oxmardyke</i> during the final couple months of his life, dying in March 2022. Ranging for eerie to abrasive, melancholy to crushing, Jeck has morphed Watson's purposeful recordings of trains, bridges, and water into an array of cavernous and reverberating pieces which swallow up the landscape, railway, and cars alike. The resulting record is one about crossings, not only Oxmardyke crossing itself but also the crossing of Watson and Jeck, natural and industrial, high and low fidelities, signal and noise. <i>Oxmardyke</i> is a complex and intense sonic space, a testament to both of its creators' mastery, and, ultimately, a beautiful record about the forgotten places where nature and culture meet.</p><p>Bird song serves as a recurring motif, scattered across the album's nine tracks. Its deployment on the opener, ‘Oxmardyke’, is illustrative of the record's preoccupation with nature and society in dialogue, conflict, and collapse. A twittering bubbles across the stereo field, a mostly unaltered version of Watson's recording, before an alarm of some kind begins to beep, oscillating between notes, breaking the pastoral spell. First a car, then a train whoosh by. A thin and highly treated drone emerges beneath the bird song and trains, a sound not clearly assignable to the orders of vehicles, alarms, birds, and wind. This track and the penultimate ‘Salt End’ let Watson's recordings breathe and come to the forefront. Yet, Jeck's wiry undergrowth of clearly treated sound refuses a naturalisation of the scene. Unlike some of the work from Natasha Barrett's (also excellent) recent album of electronically altered field recordings, <i>Reconfiguring the Landscape</i> (2023), we can never be wholly ‘immersed’ in the location of Oxmardyke in the sense that the landscape of sounds can be picked out and spatialised. This disconnect, felt strongly on the dark and rumbling ‘Barn’ and ‘Drum’, complicates the narrative of environmental exploitation that the album seems to open up before us: the cars and trains drowning out the birds, society/humans/capital churning up the landscape, dark satanic mills, and so forth. There is, of course, a very real sense of anthropogenic environmental collapse, as when the metallic high-pitched ringing on ‘Coop’, a sound situated all too perfectly in the centre of the aural space, masks the soundscape of bird calls captured in dispersed stereo. But this binary of artificial/natural breaks down aurally as the track progresses. String-like swells rise, creeping in sinisterly; the birds drop out. When they re-emerge, the calls are as centred as the ringing sound from the track's opening, losing their illusion of naturalness and the immediacy of their previous audio spatialisation.</p><p>Perspective, or loss thereof, is for acoustic ecologist R. Murray Schafer a key distinction between high-fidelity (hi-fi) and low-fidelity (lo-fi) soundscapes. Schafer almost entirely equates the former with ‘natural’ environments – forests, the countryside, etc. – whilst the latter is ubiquitous with industry, cities, cars, and other vehicles. His distinction proves illuminating when listening to <i>Oxmardyke</i>. For Schafer, a hi-fi soundscape, possessing a ‘favourable signal-to-noise ratio’, is ‘one in which discrete sounds can be heard clearly because of the low ambient noise level’ and ‘there is perspective-foreground and background …’, whilst in a lo-fi soundscape ‘individual acoustic signals are obscured in an overdense population of sounds’.<sup>1</sup> ‘Coop’ initially seems to make this distinction, with the hi-fi, clearly spatialised recordings of Watson smothered by Jeck's crackling lo-fi orchestra, but the return of the bird song at the track's end problematises the division, the sound resting between the immediate and the manipulated, the natural and the technological, human and non-human.</p><p>This in-between quality, the uneasy and intense encounter of cars, muffled voices, and trains with plants, birds, and the elements pervade the record. It becomes most explicit on ‘Bridge’, where the sound of running water flows into the tidal rushes of cars. This shimmering bed is cut across or bridged by the thunderous clunking of the bridge itself, the joints shuddering under the weight of what crosses it. These thuds speak to Michel Serres's important point that signal arises out of noise through an essentially exclusionary process (i.e. this part of the soundscape is meaningless noise – we will ignore it; this part is meaningful noise – we will decode it): as the bridge cuts across the cars and water, it divides, marks, renders audible the divide which it also bridges. In fact, this process affected this review. As I walked through Norwich listening to the opening track, I realised I was filtering out the <i>actual</i> bird song around me to make the recorded bird song meaningful. Schafer's ‘favourable signal-to-noise ratio’ of the natural world was always predicated on a gate box, on Schafer allowing only certain sounds to cross into the realm of meaning. He does acknowledge, however, in his book <i>The Tuning of the World</i> (1977), the influence of fusing electronic with natural sounds in his own compositions and that ‘The polynoise of the sea resembles the white noise of the laboratory’.<sup>2</sup> Such a sentence might sum up numerous albums from Jeck's career, most notably his 1999 masterpiece <i>Surf</i> and its monstrous opener, ‘Demolition’. <i>Oxmardyke</i> is also at this crossing of white noise and polynoise, the point at which human structures flow into natural ones and vice versa, our impact on our environment, its impact on us. It prods at what we choose to cut out, the spaces of crossing which we ignore, or pass over as non-places, recasting Oxmardyke as a crossing of crossings, the place where nature and society dissolve into each other.</p><p>Given the bleak outlook of our current ecological crisis (citation surely unnecessary), tracks like ‘Bridge’, ‘Coop’, and the closing ‘Spurn’ at times inspire dread. The latter in particular, consisting of pummelling water submerging the listener and the death knell of a single bird croaking faintly in the left channel, presages a future already written in the present interactions between petrol capitalism and the earth. Yet, there are lighter moments, such as the four-to-the-floor woozy groove of ‘Beetroot Train’ and the second on ‘Ah’ when a waterfowl honks much closer to the microphone than all its comrades. What's more, despite the association between Jeck and so-called ‘hauntology’, none of that genre-not-genre's usual uncanny nostalgia (think The Caretaker or Jeck's own <i>Vinyl Coda</i> (2000–2001)) creeps into <i>Oxmardyke</i>. Whilst Jeck was apparently inspired ‘the ancient history of the area from 6th century Anglo-Saxon times to the Knights Templar’,<sup>3</sup> and this does come through in earthy churnings of ‘Drum’, the record feels surprisingly present and urgent. Perhaps, this is Watson's recordings, which so brilliantly capture the location that Jeck never entirely allows us to be present in. It is the crossing between these two composers, their complimentary and contrasting aesthetics, which allow <i>Oxmardyke</i> to shine as a knot of many crossings, a record, a farewell (to Jeck and to the now defunct Oxmardyke gate box), and an ecological warning.</p>","PeriodicalId":44341,"journal":{"name":"CRITICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"66 3","pages":"126-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/criq.12782","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crossing of Crossings\",\"authors\":\"Adam Maric-Cleaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/criq.12782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Oxmardyke</i> is named for a now defunct Yorkshire rail crossing. In 2017, sound recordist Chris Watson set up microphones alongside the tracks of the Hull Line, initially to record a freight train. But Watson soon began making multiple recordings from around the site over several weeks. The late Philip Jeck, turntablist, composer, and artist, would twist these recordings into <i>Oxmardyke</i> during the final couple months of his life, dying in March 2022. Ranging for eerie to abrasive, melancholy to crushing, Jeck has morphed Watson's purposeful recordings of trains, bridges, and water into an array of cavernous and reverberating pieces which swallow up the landscape, railway, and cars alike. The resulting record is one about crossings, not only Oxmardyke crossing itself but also the crossing of Watson and Jeck, natural and industrial, high and low fidelities, signal and noise. <i>Oxmardyke</i> is a complex and intense sonic space, a testament to both of its creators' mastery, and, ultimately, a beautiful record about the forgotten places where nature and culture meet.</p><p>Bird song serves as a recurring motif, scattered across the album's nine tracks. Its deployment on the opener, ‘Oxmardyke’, is illustrative of the record's preoccupation with nature and society in dialogue, conflict, and collapse. A twittering bubbles across the stereo field, a mostly unaltered version of Watson's recording, before an alarm of some kind begins to beep, oscillating between notes, breaking the pastoral spell. First a car, then a train whoosh by. A thin and highly treated drone emerges beneath the bird song and trains, a sound not clearly assignable to the orders of vehicles, alarms, birds, and wind. This track and the penultimate ‘Salt End’ let Watson's recordings breathe and come to the forefront. Yet, Jeck's wiry undergrowth of clearly treated sound refuses a naturalisation of the scene. Unlike some of the work from Natasha Barrett's (also excellent) recent album of electronically altered field recordings, <i>Reconfiguring the Landscape</i> (2023), we can never be wholly ‘immersed’ in the location of Oxmardyke in the sense that the landscape of sounds can be picked out and spatialised. This disconnect, felt strongly on the dark and rumbling ‘Barn’ and ‘Drum’, complicates the narrative of environmental exploitation that the album seems to open up before us: the cars and trains drowning out the birds, society/humans/capital churning up the landscape, dark satanic mills, and so forth. There is, of course, a very real sense of anthropogenic environmental collapse, as when the metallic high-pitched ringing on ‘Coop’, a sound situated all too perfectly in the centre of the aural space, masks the soundscape of bird calls captured in dispersed stereo. But this binary of artificial/natural breaks down aurally as the track progresses. String-like swells rise, creeping in sinisterly; the birds drop out. When they re-emerge, the calls are as centred as the ringing sound from the track's opening, losing their illusion of naturalness and the immediacy of their previous audio spatialisation.</p><p>Perspective, or loss thereof, is for acoustic ecologist R. Murray Schafer a key distinction between high-fidelity (hi-fi) and low-fidelity (lo-fi) soundscapes. Schafer almost entirely equates the former with ‘natural’ environments – forests, the countryside, etc. – whilst the latter is ubiquitous with industry, cities, cars, and other vehicles. His distinction proves illuminating when listening to <i>Oxmardyke</i>. For Schafer, a hi-fi soundscape, possessing a ‘favourable signal-to-noise ratio’, is ‘one in which discrete sounds can be heard clearly because of the low ambient noise level’ and ‘there is perspective-foreground and background …’, whilst in a lo-fi soundscape ‘individual acoustic signals are obscured in an overdense population of sounds’.<sup>1</sup> ‘Coop’ initially seems to make this distinction, with the hi-fi, clearly spatialised recordings of Watson smothered by Jeck's crackling lo-fi orchestra, but the return of the bird song at the track's end problematises the division, the sound resting between the immediate and the manipulated, the natural and the technological, human and non-human.</p><p>This in-between quality, the uneasy and intense encounter of cars, muffled voices, and trains with plants, birds, and the elements pervade the record. It becomes most explicit on ‘Bridge’, where the sound of running water flows into the tidal rushes of cars. This shimmering bed is cut across or bridged by the thunderous clunking of the bridge itself, the joints shuddering under the weight of what crosses it. These thuds speak to Michel Serres's important point that signal arises out of noise through an essentially exclusionary process (i.e. this part of the soundscape is meaningless noise – we will ignore it; this part is meaningful noise – we will decode it): as the bridge cuts across the cars and water, it divides, marks, renders audible the divide which it also bridges. In fact, this process affected this review. As I walked through Norwich listening to the opening track, I realised I was filtering out the <i>actual</i> bird song around me to make the recorded bird song meaningful. Schafer's ‘favourable signal-to-noise ratio’ of the natural world was always predicated on a gate box, on Schafer allowing only certain sounds to cross into the realm of meaning. He does acknowledge, however, in his book <i>The Tuning of the World</i> (1977), the influence of fusing electronic with natural sounds in his own compositions and that ‘The polynoise of the sea resembles the white noise of the laboratory’.<sup>2</sup> Such a sentence might sum up numerous albums from Jeck's career, most notably his 1999 masterpiece <i>Surf</i> and its monstrous opener, ‘Demolition’. <i>Oxmardyke</i> is also at this crossing of white noise and polynoise, the point at which human structures flow into natural ones and vice versa, our impact on our environment, its impact on us. It prods at what we choose to cut out, the spaces of crossing which we ignore, or pass over as non-places, recasting Oxmardyke as a crossing of crossings, the place where nature and society dissolve into each other.</p><p>Given the bleak outlook of our current ecological crisis (citation surely unnecessary), tracks like ‘Bridge’, ‘Coop’, and the closing ‘Spurn’ at times inspire dread. The latter in particular, consisting of pummelling water submerging the listener and the death knell of a single bird croaking faintly in the left channel, presages a future already written in the present interactions between petrol capitalism and the earth. Yet, there are lighter moments, such as the four-to-the-floor woozy groove of ‘Beetroot Train’ and the second on ‘Ah’ when a waterfowl honks much closer to the microphone than all its comrades. What's more, despite the association between Jeck and so-called ‘hauntology’, none of that genre-not-genre's usual uncanny nostalgia (think The Caretaker or Jeck's own <i>Vinyl Coda</i> (2000–2001)) creeps into <i>Oxmardyke</i>. Whilst Jeck was apparently inspired ‘the ancient history of the area from 6th century Anglo-Saxon times to the Knights Templar’,<sup>3</sup> and this does come through in earthy churnings of ‘Drum’, the record feels surprisingly present and urgent. Perhaps, this is Watson's recordings, which so brilliantly capture the location that Jeck never entirely allows us to be present in. It is the crossing between these two composers, their complimentary and contrasting aesthetics, which allow <i>Oxmardyke</i> to shine as a knot of many crossings, a record, a farewell (to Jeck and to the now defunct Oxmardyke gate box), and an ecological warning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CRITICAL QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"66 3\",\"pages\":\"126-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/criq.12782\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CRITICAL QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/criq.12782\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY REVIEWS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/criq.12782","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY REVIEWS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实上,这个过程也影响了这篇评论。当我听着开头的曲目穿过诺维奇时,我意识到自己正在过滤掉周围真实的鸟鸣,使录制的鸟鸣变得有意义。舍费尔对自然世界的 "有利信噪比 "始终是建立在门框之上的,舍费尔只允许某些声音进入意义领域。不过,他在《世界的调谐》(1977 年)一书中承认,在自己的创作中,电子与自然声音的融合产生了影响,"海洋的多噪音类似于实验室的白噪音 "2 。Oxmardyke 也处于白噪音和多噪音的交汇点,即人类结构与自然结构的交汇点,反之亦然,我们对环境的影响,环境对我们的影响。它探究的是我们选择割舍的东西,是我们忽视或视而不见的穿越空间,它将 Oxmardyke 重塑为穿越中的穿越,是自然与社会相互消融的地方。考虑到当前生态危机的暗淡前景(引用肯定没有必要),《桥》、《库》和结尾的《Spurn》等曲目有时会让人感到恐惧。尤其是《Spurn》,由淹没听众的汹涌水流和左声道中一只鸟儿微弱呱呱的丧钟声组成,预示着汽油资本主义与地球之间的互动已写入了未来。然而,也有轻松的时刻,如《甜菜根列车》中四平八稳的低沉旋律,以及《啊》中的第二段,一只水鸟鸣叫时比所有同伴都更靠近麦克风。更重要的是,尽管杰克与所谓的 "鬼魂学 "有着千丝万缕的联系,但在 Oxmardyke 中却丝毫没有这种非流派音乐中常见的不可思议的怀旧情绪(想想《看守人》或杰克自己的《Vinyl Coda》(2000-2001 年))。虽然杰克的灵感显然来自 "该地区从六世纪盎格鲁-撒克逊时代到圣殿骑士团的古老历史 "3 ,这一点也确实体现在《鼓声》的泥土翻滚中,但这张唱片给人的感觉却是出奇的真实和紧迫。也许,正是沃森的录音出色地捕捉到了杰克从未让我们完全置身其中的地点。正是这两位作曲家之间的交集、他们互为补充又截然相反的美学,让《Oxmardyke》闪耀出许多交集的结点、一张唱片、一次告别(向杰克和现已停用的《Oxmardyke》门箱)和一次生态警示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crossing of Crossings

Oxmardyke is named for a now defunct Yorkshire rail crossing. In 2017, sound recordist Chris Watson set up microphones alongside the tracks of the Hull Line, initially to record a freight train. But Watson soon began making multiple recordings from around the site over several weeks. The late Philip Jeck, turntablist, composer, and artist, would twist these recordings into Oxmardyke during the final couple months of his life, dying in March 2022. Ranging for eerie to abrasive, melancholy to crushing, Jeck has morphed Watson's purposeful recordings of trains, bridges, and water into an array of cavernous and reverberating pieces which swallow up the landscape, railway, and cars alike. The resulting record is one about crossings, not only Oxmardyke crossing itself but also the crossing of Watson and Jeck, natural and industrial, high and low fidelities, signal and noise. Oxmardyke is a complex and intense sonic space, a testament to both of its creators' mastery, and, ultimately, a beautiful record about the forgotten places where nature and culture meet.

Bird song serves as a recurring motif, scattered across the album's nine tracks. Its deployment on the opener, ‘Oxmardyke’, is illustrative of the record's preoccupation with nature and society in dialogue, conflict, and collapse. A twittering bubbles across the stereo field, a mostly unaltered version of Watson's recording, before an alarm of some kind begins to beep, oscillating between notes, breaking the pastoral spell. First a car, then a train whoosh by. A thin and highly treated drone emerges beneath the bird song and trains, a sound not clearly assignable to the orders of vehicles, alarms, birds, and wind. This track and the penultimate ‘Salt End’ let Watson's recordings breathe and come to the forefront. Yet, Jeck's wiry undergrowth of clearly treated sound refuses a naturalisation of the scene. Unlike some of the work from Natasha Barrett's (also excellent) recent album of electronically altered field recordings, Reconfiguring the Landscape (2023), we can never be wholly ‘immersed’ in the location of Oxmardyke in the sense that the landscape of sounds can be picked out and spatialised. This disconnect, felt strongly on the dark and rumbling ‘Barn’ and ‘Drum’, complicates the narrative of environmental exploitation that the album seems to open up before us: the cars and trains drowning out the birds, society/humans/capital churning up the landscape, dark satanic mills, and so forth. There is, of course, a very real sense of anthropogenic environmental collapse, as when the metallic high-pitched ringing on ‘Coop’, a sound situated all too perfectly in the centre of the aural space, masks the soundscape of bird calls captured in dispersed stereo. But this binary of artificial/natural breaks down aurally as the track progresses. String-like swells rise, creeping in sinisterly; the birds drop out. When they re-emerge, the calls are as centred as the ringing sound from the track's opening, losing their illusion of naturalness and the immediacy of their previous audio spatialisation.

Perspective, or loss thereof, is for acoustic ecologist R. Murray Schafer a key distinction between high-fidelity (hi-fi) and low-fidelity (lo-fi) soundscapes. Schafer almost entirely equates the former with ‘natural’ environments – forests, the countryside, etc. – whilst the latter is ubiquitous with industry, cities, cars, and other vehicles. His distinction proves illuminating when listening to Oxmardyke. For Schafer, a hi-fi soundscape, possessing a ‘favourable signal-to-noise ratio’, is ‘one in which discrete sounds can be heard clearly because of the low ambient noise level’ and ‘there is perspective-foreground and background …’, whilst in a lo-fi soundscape ‘individual acoustic signals are obscured in an overdense population of sounds’.1 ‘Coop’ initially seems to make this distinction, with the hi-fi, clearly spatialised recordings of Watson smothered by Jeck's crackling lo-fi orchestra, but the return of the bird song at the track's end problematises the division, the sound resting between the immediate and the manipulated, the natural and the technological, human and non-human.

This in-between quality, the uneasy and intense encounter of cars, muffled voices, and trains with plants, birds, and the elements pervade the record. It becomes most explicit on ‘Bridge’, where the sound of running water flows into the tidal rushes of cars. This shimmering bed is cut across or bridged by the thunderous clunking of the bridge itself, the joints shuddering under the weight of what crosses it. These thuds speak to Michel Serres's important point that signal arises out of noise through an essentially exclusionary process (i.e. this part of the soundscape is meaningless noise – we will ignore it; this part is meaningful noise – we will decode it): as the bridge cuts across the cars and water, it divides, marks, renders audible the divide which it also bridges. In fact, this process affected this review. As I walked through Norwich listening to the opening track, I realised I was filtering out the actual bird song around me to make the recorded bird song meaningful. Schafer's ‘favourable signal-to-noise ratio’ of the natural world was always predicated on a gate box, on Schafer allowing only certain sounds to cross into the realm of meaning. He does acknowledge, however, in his book The Tuning of the World (1977), the influence of fusing electronic with natural sounds in his own compositions and that ‘The polynoise of the sea resembles the white noise of the laboratory’.2 Such a sentence might sum up numerous albums from Jeck's career, most notably his 1999 masterpiece Surf and its monstrous opener, ‘Demolition’. Oxmardyke is also at this crossing of white noise and polynoise, the point at which human structures flow into natural ones and vice versa, our impact on our environment, its impact on us. It prods at what we choose to cut out, the spaces of crossing which we ignore, or pass over as non-places, recasting Oxmardyke as a crossing of crossings, the place where nature and society dissolve into each other.

Given the bleak outlook of our current ecological crisis (citation surely unnecessary), tracks like ‘Bridge’, ‘Coop’, and the closing ‘Spurn’ at times inspire dread. The latter in particular, consisting of pummelling water submerging the listener and the death knell of a single bird croaking faintly in the left channel, presages a future already written in the present interactions between petrol capitalism and the earth. Yet, there are lighter moments, such as the four-to-the-floor woozy groove of ‘Beetroot Train’ and the second on ‘Ah’ when a waterfowl honks much closer to the microphone than all its comrades. What's more, despite the association between Jeck and so-called ‘hauntology’, none of that genre-not-genre's usual uncanny nostalgia (think The Caretaker or Jeck's own Vinyl Coda (2000–2001)) creeps into Oxmardyke. Whilst Jeck was apparently inspired ‘the ancient history of the area from 6th century Anglo-Saxon times to the Knights Templar’,3 and this does come through in earthy churnings of ‘Drum’, the record feels surprisingly present and urgent. Perhaps, this is Watson's recordings, which so brilliantly capture the location that Jeck never entirely allows us to be present in. It is the crossing between these two composers, their complimentary and contrasting aesthetics, which allow Oxmardyke to shine as a knot of many crossings, a record, a farewell (to Jeck and to the now defunct Oxmardyke gate box), and an ecological warning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CRITICAL QUARTERLY
CRITICAL QUARTERLY LITERARY REVIEWS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Critical Quarterly is internationally renowned for it unique blend of literary criticism, cultural studies, poetry and fiction. The journal addresses the whole range of cultural forms so that discussions of, for example, cinema and television can appear alongside analyses of the accepted literary canon. It is a necessary condition of debate in these areas that it should involve as many and as varied voices as possible, and Critical Quarterly welcomes submissions from new researchers and writers as well as more established contributors.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Editorial Revaluations ‘Notebook Literature’: Virginia Woolf and Marion Milner Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1