颅底脊索瘤切除术中枕颈融合术的解剖学决定因素:文献系统回顾与病例说明

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.3171/2024.3.focus248
Danielle Golub, Alexander F. Küffer, Shimon Garrel, Sara Zandpazandi, Joshua D. McBriar, Siddhi Modi, Kyriakos Papadimitriou, Peter D. Costantino, Daniel M. Sciubba, Amir R. Dehdashti
{"title":"颅底脊索瘤切除术中枕颈融合术的解剖学决定因素:文献系统回顾与病例说明","authors":"Danielle Golub, Alexander F. Küffer, Shimon Garrel, Sara Zandpazandi, Joshua D. McBriar, Siddhi Modi, Kyriakos Papadimitriou, Peter D. Costantino, Daniel M. Sciubba, Amir R. Dehdashti","doi":"10.3171/2024.3.focus248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\n<p>Skull base chordomas are rare, locally osseo-destructive lesions that present unique surgical challenges due to their involvement of critical neurovascular and bony structures at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). Radical cytoreductive surgery improves survival but also carries significant morbidity, including the potential for occipitocervical (OC) destabilization requiring instrumented fusion. The published experience on OC fusion after CVJ chordoma resection is limited, and the anatomical predictors of OC instability in this context remain unclear.</p>\nMETHODS\n<p>PubMed and Embase were systematically searched according to the PRISMA guidelines for studies describing skull base chordoma resection and OC fusion. The search strategy was predefined in the authors’ PROSPERO protocol (CRD42024496158).</p>\nRESULTS\n<p>The systematic review identified 11 surgical case series describing 209 skull base chordoma patients and 116 (55.5%) who underwent OC instrumented fusion. Most patients underwent lateral approaches (n = 82) for chordoma resection, followed by midline (n = 48) and combined (n = 6) approaches. OC fusion was most often performed as a second-stage procedure (n = 53), followed by single-stage resection and fusion (n = 38). The degree of occipital condyle resection associated with OC fusion was described in 9 studies: total unilateral condylectomy reliably predicted OC fusion regardless of surgical approach. After lateral transcranial approaches, 4 studies cited at least 50%–70% unilateral condylectomy as necessitating OC fusion. After midline approaches—most frequently the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA)—at least 75% unilateral condylectomy (or 50% bilateral condylectomy) led to OC fusion. Additionally, resection of the medial atlantoaxial joint elements (the C1 anterior arch and tip of the dens), usually via EEA, reliably necessitated OC fusion. Two illustrative cases are subsequently presented, further exemplifying how the extent of CVJ bony elements removed via EEA to achieve complete chordoma resection predicts the need for OC fusion.</p>\nCONCLUSIONS\n<p>Unilateral total condylectomy, 50% bilateral condylectomy, and resection of the medial atlantoaxial joint elements were the most frequently described independent predictors of OC fusion in skull base chordoma resection. Additionally, consistent with the occipital condyle harboring a significantly thicker joint capsule at its posterolateral aspect, an anterior midline approach seems to tolerate a greater degree of condylar resection (75%) than a lateral transcranial approach (50%–70%) prior to generating OC instability.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomical determinants of occipitocervical fusion in skull base chordoma resection: a systematic review of the literature with illustrative cases\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Golub, Alexander F. Küffer, Shimon Garrel, Sara Zandpazandi, Joshua D. McBriar, Siddhi Modi, Kyriakos Papadimitriou, Peter D. Costantino, Daniel M. Sciubba, Amir R. Dehdashti\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.3.focus248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\n<p>Skull base chordomas are rare, locally osseo-destructive lesions that present unique surgical challenges due to their involvement of critical neurovascular and bony structures at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). Radical cytoreductive surgery improves survival but also carries significant morbidity, including the potential for occipitocervical (OC) destabilization requiring instrumented fusion. The published experience on OC fusion after CVJ chordoma resection is limited, and the anatomical predictors of OC instability in this context remain unclear.</p>\\nMETHODS\\n<p>PubMed and Embase were systematically searched according to the PRISMA guidelines for studies describing skull base chordoma resection and OC fusion. The search strategy was predefined in the authors’ PROSPERO protocol (CRD42024496158).</p>\\nRESULTS\\n<p>The systematic review identified 11 surgical case series describing 209 skull base chordoma patients and 116 (55.5%) who underwent OC instrumented fusion. Most patients underwent lateral approaches (n = 82) for chordoma resection, followed by midline (n = 48) and combined (n = 6) approaches. OC fusion was most often performed as a second-stage procedure (n = 53), followed by single-stage resection and fusion (n = 38). The degree of occipital condyle resection associated with OC fusion was described in 9 studies: total unilateral condylectomy reliably predicted OC fusion regardless of surgical approach. After lateral transcranial approaches, 4 studies cited at least 50%–70% unilateral condylectomy as necessitating OC fusion. After midline approaches—most frequently the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA)—at least 75% unilateral condylectomy (or 50% bilateral condylectomy) led to OC fusion. Additionally, resection of the medial atlantoaxial joint elements (the C1 anterior arch and tip of the dens), usually via EEA, reliably necessitated OC fusion. Two illustrative cases are subsequently presented, further exemplifying how the extent of CVJ bony elements removed via EEA to achieve complete chordoma resection predicts the need for OC fusion.</p>\\nCONCLUSIONS\\n<p>Unilateral total condylectomy, 50% bilateral condylectomy, and resection of the medial atlantoaxial joint elements were the most frequently described independent predictors of OC fusion in skull base chordoma resection. Additionally, consistent with the occipital condyle harboring a significantly thicker joint capsule at its posterolateral aspect, an anterior midline approach seems to tolerate a greater degree of condylar resection (75%) than a lateral transcranial approach (50%–70%) prior to generating OC instability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.3.focus248\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.3.focus248","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的颅底脊索瘤是一种罕见的局部骨破坏性病变,由于累及颅椎骨交界处(CVJ)的重要神经血管和骨结构,给手术带来了独特的挑战。根治性囊肿切除手术可提高生存率,但也会带来严重的发病率,包括可能导致枕颈(OC)失稳,需要进行器械融合。已发表的有关 CVJ 脊索瘤切除术后 OC 融合术的经验有限,而且在这种情况下 OC 不稳定的解剖学预测因素仍不清楚。方法根据 PRISMA 指南系统地检索了 SpubMed 和 Embase 中有关颅底脊索瘤切除术和 OC 融合术的研究。结果系统性综述发现了11个手术病例系列,描述了209例颅底脊索瘤患者,其中116例(55.5%)接受了OC器械融合术。大多数患者采用侧线入路(82 例)切除脊索瘤,其次是中线入路(48 例)和联合入路(6 例)。OC融合术最常作为第二阶段手术进行(53例),其次是单阶段切除和融合术(38例)。9项研究对与OC融合相关的枕骨髁切除程度进行了描述:无论采用哪种手术方法,单侧全髁切除术都能可靠地预测OC融合。在侧经颅入路后,4 项研究指出至少 50%-70%的单侧髁状突切除才有必要进行 OC 融合术。在中线入路后--最常见的是内窥镜鼻内入路(EEA)--至少75%的单侧髁突切除术(或50%的双侧髁突切除术)会导致OC融合。此外,通常通过 EEA 进行的寰枢关节内侧部分(C1 前弓和穹窿顶)切除术也会导致必须进行 OC 融合术。结论在颅底脊索瘤切除术中,单侧全髁切除术、50% 双侧髁切除术和内侧寰枢关节成分切除术是最常被描述的 OC 融合术独立预测因素。此外,由于枕骨髁后外侧的关节囊明显较厚,因此在产生OC不稳之前,前中线入路似乎比外侧经颅入路(50%-70%)可容忍更大程度的髁状突切除(75%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anatomical determinants of occipitocervical fusion in skull base chordoma resection: a systematic review of the literature with illustrative cases
OBJECTIVE

Skull base chordomas are rare, locally osseo-destructive lesions that present unique surgical challenges due to their involvement of critical neurovascular and bony structures at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). Radical cytoreductive surgery improves survival but also carries significant morbidity, including the potential for occipitocervical (OC) destabilization requiring instrumented fusion. The published experience on OC fusion after CVJ chordoma resection is limited, and the anatomical predictors of OC instability in this context remain unclear.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were systematically searched according to the PRISMA guidelines for studies describing skull base chordoma resection and OC fusion. The search strategy was predefined in the authors’ PROSPERO protocol (CRD42024496158).

RESULTS

The systematic review identified 11 surgical case series describing 209 skull base chordoma patients and 116 (55.5%) who underwent OC instrumented fusion. Most patients underwent lateral approaches (n = 82) for chordoma resection, followed by midline (n = 48) and combined (n = 6) approaches. OC fusion was most often performed as a second-stage procedure (n = 53), followed by single-stage resection and fusion (n = 38). The degree of occipital condyle resection associated with OC fusion was described in 9 studies: total unilateral condylectomy reliably predicted OC fusion regardless of surgical approach. After lateral transcranial approaches, 4 studies cited at least 50%–70% unilateral condylectomy as necessitating OC fusion. After midline approaches—most frequently the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA)—at least 75% unilateral condylectomy (or 50% bilateral condylectomy) led to OC fusion. Additionally, resection of the medial atlantoaxial joint elements (the C1 anterior arch and tip of the dens), usually via EEA, reliably necessitated OC fusion. Two illustrative cases are subsequently presented, further exemplifying how the extent of CVJ bony elements removed via EEA to achieve complete chordoma resection predicts the need for OC fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Unilateral total condylectomy, 50% bilateral condylectomy, and resection of the medial atlantoaxial joint elements were the most frequently described independent predictors of OC fusion in skull base chordoma resection. Additionally, consistent with the occipital condyle harboring a significantly thicker joint capsule at its posterolateral aspect, an anterior midline approach seems to tolerate a greater degree of condylar resection (75%) than a lateral transcranial approach (50%–70%) prior to generating OC instability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
期刊最新文献
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment promotes tendon-bone interface healing in a rabbit model of rotator cuff tears. Oxygen-ozone therapy for myocardial ischemic stroke and cardiovascular disorders. Comparative study on the anti-inflammatory and protective effects of different oxygen therapy regimens on lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury in mice. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide system and development of the heart. Hyperbaric oxygen for moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: outcomes 5-8 years after injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1