Carolin Schmidt , Robert Stöhr , Lora Dimitrova , Matthias W. Beckmann , Matthias Rübner , Peter A. Fasching , Carsten Denkert , Ulrich Lehmann , Claudia Vollbrecht , Florian Haller , Arndt Hartmann , Ramona Erber
{"title":"激素受体阳性/人类表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性乳腺癌组织中 PIK3CA 突变的质量保证分析:精准医学中的高质量分子生物标记物报告需要能力验证的故事","authors":"Carolin Schmidt , Robert Stöhr , Lora Dimitrova , Matthias W. Beckmann , Matthias Rübner , Peter A. Fasching , Carsten Denkert , Ulrich Lehmann , Claudia Vollbrecht , Florian Haller , Arndt Hartmann , Ramona Erber","doi":"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed <em>PIK3CA</em> (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised <em>n</em> = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (<em>n</em> = 11/13), 88.6% (<em>n</em> = 39/44), and 87.9% (<em>n</em> = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent <em>PIK3CA</em> EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for <em>PIK3CA</em> mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50128,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":"26 7","pages":"Pages 624-637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000886/pdfft?md5=15cd603c9e8e35e03820df892655af33&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157824000886-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality-Assured Analysis of PIK3CA Mutations in Hormone Receptor–Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer Tissue\",\"authors\":\"Carolin Schmidt , Robert Stöhr , Lora Dimitrova , Matthias W. Beckmann , Matthias Rübner , Peter A. Fasching , Carsten Denkert , Ulrich Lehmann , Claudia Vollbrecht , Florian Haller , Arndt Hartmann , Ramona Erber\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmoldx.2024.04.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed <em>PIK3CA</em> (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised <em>n</em> = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (<em>n</em> = 11/13), 88.6% (<em>n</em> = 39/44), and 87.9% (<em>n</em> = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent <em>PIK3CA</em> EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for <em>PIK3CA</em> mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"26 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 624-637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000886/pdfft?md5=15cd603c9e8e35e03820df892655af33&pid=1-s2.0-S1525157824000886-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000886\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525157824000886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality-Assured Analysis of PIK3CA Mutations in Hormone Receptor–Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Breast Cancer Tissue
In precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised n = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (n = 11/13), 88.6% (n = 39/44), and 87.9% (n = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent PIK3CA EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for PIK3CA mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, the official publication of the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), co-owned by the American Society for Investigative Pathology (ASIP), seeks to publish high quality original papers on scientific advances in the translation and validation of molecular discoveries in medicine into the clinical diagnostic setting, and the description and application of technological advances in the field of molecular diagnostic medicine. The editors welcome for review articles that contain: novel discoveries or clinicopathologic correlations including studies in oncology, infectious diseases, inherited diseases, predisposition to disease, clinical informatics, or the description of polymorphisms linked to disease states or normal variations; the application of diagnostic methodologies in clinical trials; or the development of new or improved molecular methods which may be applied to diagnosis or monitoring of disease or disease predisposition.