Hai Long, Quanying He, Yanmei Bi, Yingchun Ke, Xiaoxin Xie, Xiuhong Zhao, Si Tan, Yanhe Luo, Zhong Chen, Xiaoli Yu, Linghua Li
{"title":"基于阿依诺韦林的治疗方案与基于依非韦伦的治疗方案在第24周对HIV-1病毒感染者的疗效及其对血脂的影响:一项真实世界、回顾性、多中心队列研究。","authors":"Hai Long, Quanying He, Yanmei Bi, Yingchun Ke, Xiaoxin Xie, Xiuhong Zhao, Si Tan, Yanhe Luo, Zhong Chen, Xiaoli Yu, Linghua Li","doi":"10.5582/bst.2024.01070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and effect on lipid profiles of Ainuovirine (ANV)- and efavirenz (EFV) -based regimens in treatment-naïve people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) at week 24. The proportion of PLWH achieving HIV-1 RNA < the limit of quantification in the ANV group was significantly higher than that in the EFV group (89.18% vs. 76.04%, P = 0.002). The mean change of log<sub>10</sub> HIV-1 RNA from baseline was greater (-4.34 vs. -4.18, P < 0.001), the median change from baseline in CD4+ T cell count increased more (106.00 cells/μL vs. 92.00 cells/μL, P = 0.007) in the ANV group, while the CD4+/CD8+ ratio was similar (0.15 vs. 0.20, P = 0.167) between the two groups. The mean changes from baseline in total cholesterol (-0.02 for ANV vs. 0.25 mmol/L for EFV, P < 0.001), triglyceride (-0.14 for ANV vs. 0.11 mmol/L for EFV, P = 0.024), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.07 for ANV vs. 0.15 mmol/L for EFV, P < 0.001) was significantly different between the two groups. The percentage of patients with improved lipid profiles was significantly higher in the ANV group (37.44 %) than in the EFV group (29.55%, P = 0.0495). The incidence of any adverse events in the ANV group was significantly lower than that in the EFV group at week 12 (6.2% vs. 30.7%, P < 0.001) and was comparable at week 24 (3.6% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.28). The ANV-based regimen was well tolerated and lipid-friendly in treatment-naïve PLWH.</p>","PeriodicalId":8957,"journal":{"name":"Bioscience trends","volume":" ","pages":"176-186"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and effect on lipid profiles of Ainuovirine-based regimen versus Efavirenz-based regimen in treatment-naïve people with HIV-1 at week 24: A real-world, retrospective, multi-center cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Hai Long, Quanying He, Yanmei Bi, Yingchun Ke, Xiaoxin Xie, Xiuhong Zhao, Si Tan, Yanhe Luo, Zhong Chen, Xiaoli Yu, Linghua Li\",\"doi\":\"10.5582/bst.2024.01070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and effect on lipid profiles of Ainuovirine (ANV)- and efavirenz (EFV) -based regimens in treatment-naïve people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) at week 24. The proportion of PLWH achieving HIV-1 RNA < the limit of quantification in the ANV group was significantly higher than that in the EFV group (89.18% vs. 76.04%, P = 0.002). The mean change of log<sub>10</sub> HIV-1 RNA from baseline was greater (-4.34 vs. -4.18, P < 0.001), the median change from baseline in CD4+ T cell count increased more (106.00 cells/μL vs. 92.00 cells/μL, P = 0.007) in the ANV group, while the CD4+/CD8+ ratio was similar (0.15 vs. 0.20, P = 0.167) between the two groups. The mean changes from baseline in total cholesterol (-0.02 for ANV vs. 0.25 mmol/L for EFV, P < 0.001), triglyceride (-0.14 for ANV vs. 0.11 mmol/L for EFV, P = 0.024), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.07 for ANV vs. 0.15 mmol/L for EFV, P < 0.001) was significantly different between the two groups. The percentage of patients with improved lipid profiles was significantly higher in the ANV group (37.44 %) than in the EFV group (29.55%, P = 0.0495). The incidence of any adverse events in the ANV group was significantly lower than that in the EFV group at week 12 (6.2% vs. 30.7%, P < 0.001) and was comparable at week 24 (3.6% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.28). The ANV-based regimen was well tolerated and lipid-friendly in treatment-naïve PLWH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioscience trends\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"176-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioscience trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01070\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioscience trends","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2024.01070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在比较基于阿依诺韦林(Ainuovirine,ANV)和依非韦伦(Efavirenz,EFV)的治疗方案对HIV-1病毒感染者(PLWH)在第24周时血脂谱的疗效和影响。ANV组达到HIV-1 RNA小于定量限的HIV-1感染者比例明显高于EFV组(89.18%对76.04%,P = 0.002)。ANV 组的 HIV-1 RNA log10 平均值与基线相比变化更大(-4.34 vs. -4.18,P <0.001),CD4+ T 细胞计数中位数与基线相比变化更大(106.00 cells/μL vs. 92.00 cells/μL,P =0.007),而两组之间的 CD4+/CD8+ 比值相似(0.15 vs. 0.20,P =0.167)。两组患者总胆固醇(ANV为-0.02,EFV为0.25 mmol/L,P<0.001)、甘油三酯(ANV为-0.14,EFV为0.11 mmol/L,P=0.024)和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(ANV为-0.07,EFV为0.15 mmol/L,P<0.001)与基线相比的平均变化有显著差异。血脂状况得到改善的患者比例,ANV 组(37.44%)明显高于 EFV 组(29.55%,P = 0.0495)。第12周时,ANV组任何不良事件的发生率明显低于EFV组(6.2% vs. 30.7%,P < 0.001),第24周时的发生率与EFV组相当(3.6% vs. 5.5%,P = 0.28)。以ANV为基础的治疗方案耐受性良好,对治疗无效的艾滋病毒感染者的血脂友好。
Efficacy and effect on lipid profiles of Ainuovirine-based regimen versus Efavirenz-based regimen in treatment-naïve people with HIV-1 at week 24: A real-world, retrospective, multi-center cohort study.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and effect on lipid profiles of Ainuovirine (ANV)- and efavirenz (EFV) -based regimens in treatment-naïve people living with HIV-1 (PLWH) at week 24. The proportion of PLWH achieving HIV-1 RNA < the limit of quantification in the ANV group was significantly higher than that in the EFV group (89.18% vs. 76.04%, P = 0.002). The mean change of log10 HIV-1 RNA from baseline was greater (-4.34 vs. -4.18, P < 0.001), the median change from baseline in CD4+ T cell count increased more (106.00 cells/μL vs. 92.00 cells/μL, P = 0.007) in the ANV group, while the CD4+/CD8+ ratio was similar (0.15 vs. 0.20, P = 0.167) between the two groups. The mean changes from baseline in total cholesterol (-0.02 for ANV vs. 0.25 mmol/L for EFV, P < 0.001), triglyceride (-0.14 for ANV vs. 0.11 mmol/L for EFV, P = 0.024), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.07 for ANV vs. 0.15 mmol/L for EFV, P < 0.001) was significantly different between the two groups. The percentage of patients with improved lipid profiles was significantly higher in the ANV group (37.44 %) than in the EFV group (29.55%, P = 0.0495). The incidence of any adverse events in the ANV group was significantly lower than that in the EFV group at week 12 (6.2% vs. 30.7%, P < 0.001) and was comparable at week 24 (3.6% vs. 5.5%, P = 0.28). The ANV-based regimen was well tolerated and lipid-friendly in treatment-naïve PLWH.
期刊介绍:
BioScience Trends (Print ISSN 1881-7815, Online ISSN 1881-7823) is an international peer-reviewed journal. BioScience Trends devotes to publishing the latest and most exciting advances in scientific research. Articles cover fields of life science such as biochemistry, molecular biology, clinical research, public health, medical care system, and social science in order to encourage cooperation and exchange among scientists and clinical researchers.