从面对面到远程医疗糖尿病视网膜病变筛查计划的过渡。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia Pub Date : 2024-04-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0200
Vanessa de O Almeida Barbieri, Luis Filipe Nakayama, Gabriel Almeida Barbieri, Suzane Eberhart Ribeiro da Silva, Daniel Cunha José Karmouche, Marcelle Naomi Oshiro Shinzato, Rodrigo Eiji Nakagawa, Caio Vinicius Regatieri, Fernando Korn Malerbi
{"title":"从面对面到远程医疗糖尿病视网膜病变筛查计划的过渡。","authors":"Vanessa de O Almeida Barbieri, Luis Filipe Nakayama, Gabriel Almeida Barbieri, Suzane Eberhart Ribeiro da Silva, Daniel Cunha José Karmouche, Marcelle Naomi Oshiro Shinzato, Rodrigo Eiji Nakagawa, Caio Vinicius Regatieri, Fernando Korn Malerbi","doi":"10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Timely screening and treatment are essential for preventing diabetic retinopathy blindness. Improving screening workflows can reduce waiting times for specialist evaluation and thus enhance patient outcomes. This study assessed different screening approaches in a Brazilian public healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated a telemedicine-based diabetic retinopathy screening implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and compared it with in-person strategies. The evaluation was conducted from the perspective of a specialized referral center in an urban area of Central-West Brazil. In the telemedicine approach, a trained technician would capture retinal images by using a handheld camera. These images were sent to specialists for remote evaluation. Patient variables, including age, gender, duration of diabetes diagnosis, diabetes treatment, comorbidities, and waiting time, were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 437 patients with diabetes mellitus were included in the study (mean age: 62.5 ± 11.0 years, female: 61.7%, mean diabetes duration: 15.3 ± 9.7 years, insulin users: 67.8%). In the in-person assessment group, the average waiting time between primary care referral and specialist evaluation was 292.3 ± 213.9 days, and the referral rate was 73.29%. In the telemedicine group, the average waiting time was 158.8 ± 192.4 days, and the referral rate was 29.38%. The telemedicine approach significantly reduced the waiting time (p<0.001) and significantly lowered the referral rate (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The telemedicine approach significantly reduced the waiting time for specialist evaluation in a real-world setting. Employing portable retinal cameras may address the burden of diabetic retinopathy, especially in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8397,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","volume":"87 4","pages":"e2023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transition from an in-person to a telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening program.\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa de O Almeida Barbieri, Luis Filipe Nakayama, Gabriel Almeida Barbieri, Suzane Eberhart Ribeiro da Silva, Daniel Cunha José Karmouche, Marcelle Naomi Oshiro Shinzato, Rodrigo Eiji Nakagawa, Caio Vinicius Regatieri, Fernando Korn Malerbi\",\"doi\":\"10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Timely screening and treatment are essential for preventing diabetic retinopathy blindness. Improving screening workflows can reduce waiting times for specialist evaluation and thus enhance patient outcomes. This study assessed different screening approaches in a Brazilian public healthcare setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated a telemedicine-based diabetic retinopathy screening implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and compared it with in-person strategies. The evaluation was conducted from the perspective of a specialized referral center in an urban area of Central-West Brazil. In the telemedicine approach, a trained technician would capture retinal images by using a handheld camera. These images were sent to specialists for remote evaluation. Patient variables, including age, gender, duration of diabetes diagnosis, diabetes treatment, comorbidities, and waiting time, were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 437 patients with diabetes mellitus were included in the study (mean age: 62.5 ± 11.0 years, female: 61.7%, mean diabetes duration: 15.3 ± 9.7 years, insulin users: 67.8%). In the in-person assessment group, the average waiting time between primary care referral and specialist evaluation was 292.3 ± 213.9 days, and the referral rate was 73.29%. In the telemedicine group, the average waiting time was 158.8 ± 192.4 days, and the referral rate was 29.38%. The telemedicine approach significantly reduced the waiting time (p<0.001) and significantly lowered the referral rate (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The telemedicine approach significantly reduced the waiting time for specialist evaluation in a real-world setting. Employing portable retinal cameras may address the burden of diabetic retinopathy, especially in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia\",\"volume\":\"87 4\",\"pages\":\"e2023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0200\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:及时筛查和治疗对预防糖尿病视网膜病变致盲至关重要。改进筛查工作流程可以缩短专家评估的等待时间,从而提高患者的治疗效果。本研究对巴西公共医疗机构的不同筛查方法进行了评估:这项回顾性研究评估了在 COVID-19 大流行期间实施的基于远程医疗的糖尿病视网膜病变筛查,并将其与面对面筛查策略进行了比较。评估是从巴西中西部城市地区一家专业转诊中心的角度进行的。在远程医疗方法中,一名训练有素的技术人员将使用手持相机拍摄视网膜图像。这些图像被发送给专家进行远程评估。对患者的年龄、性别、糖尿病诊断时间、糖尿病治疗、合并症和等待时间等变量进行了分析和比较:研究共纳入了 437 名糖尿病患者(平均年龄:62.5 ± 11.0 岁,女性:61.7%,平均糖尿病病程:15.3 ± 9.7 年):15.3 ± 9.7 年,胰岛素使用者占 67.8%):67.8%).在亲自评估组中,从初级保健转诊到专家评估的平均等待时间为 292.3 ± 213.9 天,转诊率为 73.29%。远程医疗组的平均等待时间为 158.8 ± 192.4 天,转诊率为 29.38%。远程医疗方法大大缩短了等待时间(p 结论:远程医疗方法大大缩短了等待时间:在实际环境中,远程医疗方法大大缩短了专家评估的等待时间。采用便携式视网膜照相机可以减轻糖尿病视网膜病变的负担,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transition from an in-person to a telemedicine diabetic retinopathy screening program.

Purpose: Timely screening and treatment are essential for preventing diabetic retinopathy blindness. Improving screening workflows can reduce waiting times for specialist evaluation and thus enhance patient outcomes. This study assessed different screening approaches in a Brazilian public healthcare setting.

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated a telemedicine-based diabetic retinopathy screening implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and compared it with in-person strategies. The evaluation was conducted from the perspective of a specialized referral center in an urban area of Central-West Brazil. In the telemedicine approach, a trained technician would capture retinal images by using a handheld camera. These images were sent to specialists for remote evaluation. Patient variables, including age, gender, duration of diabetes diagnosis, diabetes treatment, comorbidities, and waiting time, were analyzed and compared.

Results: In total, 437 patients with diabetes mellitus were included in the study (mean age: 62.5 ± 11.0 years, female: 61.7%, mean diabetes duration: 15.3 ± 9.7 years, insulin users: 67.8%). In the in-person assessment group, the average waiting time between primary care referral and specialist evaluation was 292.3 ± 213.9 days, and the referral rate was 73.29%. In the telemedicine group, the average waiting time was 158.8 ± 192.4 days, and the referral rate was 29.38%. The telemedicine approach significantly reduced the waiting time (p<0.001) and significantly lowered the referral rate (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The telemedicine approach significantly reduced the waiting time for specialist evaluation in a real-world setting. Employing portable retinal cameras may address the burden of diabetic retinopathy, especially in resource-limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ABO-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - electronic version), the official bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO), aims to disseminate scientific studies in Ophthalmology, Visual Science and Health public, by promoting research, improvement and updating of professionals related to the field.
期刊最新文献
Multiple visible retinal emboli in branch retinal artery occlusion secondary to internal carotid artery occlusion. Scientific impact factor versus social impact of journals. Why, what, and where to publish scientific research. Early visual intervention, visual function analysis, and grating visual acuity outcomes in children with congenital Zika syndrome. Prevalence of myopic eyes in private practice and public care services in Brazil: 11 years of retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1