机器人胰十二指肠切除术对胰腺癌患者的真正益处是什么?

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1080/17474124.2024.2351398
Irena Stefanova, Francesca Vescio, Felix Nickel, Nabeel Merali, Michele Ammendola, Rajiv P Lahiri, Tim D Pencavel, Tim R Worthington, Adam E Frampton
{"title":"机器人胰十二指肠切除术对胰腺癌患者的真正益处是什么?","authors":"Irena Stefanova, Francesca Vescio, Felix Nickel, Nabeel Merali, Michele Ammendola, Rajiv P Lahiri, Tim D Pencavel, Tim R Worthington, Adam E Frampton","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2024.2351398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease, and multimodal treatment including high-quality surgery can improve survival outcomes. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has evolved with minimally invasive approaches including the implementation of robotic PD (RPD). In this special report, we review the literature whilst evaluating the 'true benefits' of RPD compared to open approach for the treatment of PDAC.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We have performed a mini-review of studies assessing PD approaches and compared intraoperative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, post-operative complications and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>RPD was associated with similar or longer operative times, and reduced intra-operative blood loss. Perioperative pain scores were significantly lower with shorter lengths of stay with the robotic approach. With regards to post-operative complications, post-operative pancreatic fistula rates were similar, with lower rates of clinically relevant fistulas after RPD. Oncological outcomes were comparable or superior in terms of margin status, lymph node harvest, time to chemotherapy and survival between RPD and OPD. In conclusion, RPD allows safe implementation of minimally invasive PD. The current literature shows that RPD is either equivalent, or superior in certain aspects to OPD. Once more centers gain sufficient experience, RPD is likely to demonstrate clear superiority over alternative approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"133-139"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What are the true benefits of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic cancer?\",\"authors\":\"Irena Stefanova, Francesca Vescio, Felix Nickel, Nabeel Merali, Michele Ammendola, Rajiv P Lahiri, Tim D Pencavel, Tim R Worthington, Adam E Frampton\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17474124.2024.2351398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease, and multimodal treatment including high-quality surgery can improve survival outcomes. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has evolved with minimally invasive approaches including the implementation of robotic PD (RPD). In this special report, we review the literature whilst evaluating the 'true benefits' of RPD compared to open approach for the treatment of PDAC.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>We have performed a mini-review of studies assessing PD approaches and compared intraoperative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, post-operative complications and oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>RPD was associated with similar or longer operative times, and reduced intra-operative blood loss. Perioperative pain scores were significantly lower with shorter lengths of stay with the robotic approach. With regards to post-operative complications, post-operative pancreatic fistula rates were similar, with lower rates of clinically relevant fistulas after RPD. Oncological outcomes were comparable or superior in terms of margin status, lymph node harvest, time to chemotherapy and survival between RPD and OPD. In conclusion, RPD allows safe implementation of minimally invasive PD. The current literature shows that RPD is either equivalent, or superior in certain aspects to OPD. Once more centers gain sufficient experience, RPD is likely to demonstrate clear superiority over alternative approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"133-139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2024.2351398\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2024.2351398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)是一种破坏性疾病,包括高质量手术在内的多模式治疗可提高生存率。胰十二指肠切除术(PD)随着微创方法(包括机器人胰十二指肠切除术(RPD))的实施而不断发展。在这篇关键论文评估中,我们讨论了 Kalabin 等人的研究结果,同时评估了 RPD 与开放式方法相比在治疗 PDAC 方面的 "真正优势":我们对评估PD方法的研究进行了小型回顾,并比较了术中特征、围手术期结果、术后并发症和肿瘤结果:RPD的手术时间相似或更长,术中失血量减少。围手术期疼痛评分明显降低,机器人手术的住院时间更短。在术后并发症方面,术后胰瘘发生率相似,RPD术后临床相关胰瘘发生率较低。就边缘状态、淋巴结摘除、化疗时间和存活率而言,RPD和OPD的肿瘤结果相当或更优。目前的文献显示,RPD 在某些方面与 OPD 相当或更胜一筹。一旦更多的中心积累了足够的经验,RPD很可能会明显优于其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What are the true benefits of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic cancer?

Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating disease, and multimodal treatment including high-quality surgery can improve survival outcomes. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has evolved with minimally invasive approaches including the implementation of robotic PD (RPD). In this special report, we review the literature whilst evaluating the 'true benefits' of RPD compared to open approach for the treatment of PDAC.

Areas covered: We have performed a mini-review of studies assessing PD approaches and compared intraoperative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, post-operative complications and oncological outcomes.

Expert opinion: RPD was associated with similar or longer operative times, and reduced intra-operative blood loss. Perioperative pain scores were significantly lower with shorter lengths of stay with the robotic approach. With regards to post-operative complications, post-operative pancreatic fistula rates were similar, with lower rates of clinically relevant fistulas after RPD. Oncological outcomes were comparable or superior in terms of margin status, lymph node harvest, time to chemotherapy and survival between RPD and OPD. In conclusion, RPD allows safe implementation of minimally invasive PD. The current literature shows that RPD is either equivalent, or superior in certain aspects to OPD. Once more centers gain sufficient experience, RPD is likely to demonstrate clear superiority over alternative approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The enormous health and economic burden of gastrointestinal disease worldwide warrants a sharp focus on the etiology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and development of new therapies. By the end of the last century we had seen enormous advances, both in technologies to visualize disease and in curative therapies in areas such as gastric ulcer, with the advent first of the H2-antagonists and then the proton pump inhibitors - clear examples of how advances in medicine can massively benefit the patient. Nevertheless, specialists face ongoing challenges from a wide array of diseases of diverse etiology.
期刊最新文献
Colonic diverticular disease revisited. Diagnosing and managing gastroparesis - where are we now? Gastroesophageal reflux disease: indications for antireflux surgery, outcomes and side effects. Validated approaches at mayo clinic for measuring gastric and colonic transit of solids and gastric accommodation. Cellular senescence and its pathogenic and therapeutic implications in autoimmune hepatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1