Mei Zhou, Kayode Taiwo, Han Wang, Jean-Nepomuscene Ntihuga, Largus T Angenent, Joseph G Usack
{"title":"热液处理工艺水的厌氧消化:抑制剂和解毒方法综述。","authors":"Mei Zhou, Kayode Taiwo, Han Wang, Jean-Nepomuscene Ntihuga, Largus T Angenent, Joseph G Usack","doi":"10.1186/s40643-024-00756-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating hydrothermal treatment processes and anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising for maximizing resource recovery from biomass and organic waste. The process water generated during hydrothermal treatment contains high concentrations of organic matter, which can be converted into biogas using AD. However, process water also contains various compounds that inhibit the AD process. Fingerprinting these inhibitors and identifying suitable mitigation strategies and detoxification methods is necessary to optimize the integration of these two technologies. By examining the existing literature, we were able to: (1) compare the methane yields and organics removal efficiency during AD of various hydrothermal treatment process water; (2) catalog the main AD inhibitors found in hydrothermal treatment process water; (3) identify recalcitrant components limiting AD performance; and (4) evaluate approaches to detoxify specific inhibitors and degrade recalcitrant components. Common inhibitors in process water are organic acids (at high concentrations), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), oxygenated organics, and N-heterocyclic compounds. Feedstock composition is the primary determinant of organic acid and TAN formation (carbohydrates-rich and protein-rich feedstocks, respectively). In contrast, processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, reaction duration) influence the formation extent of oxygenated organics and N-heterocyclic compounds. Struvite precipitation and zeolite adsorption are the most widely used approaches to eliminate TAN inhibition. In contrast, powdered and granular activated carbon and ozonation are the preferred methods to remove toxic substances before AD treatment. Currently, ozonation is the most effective approach to reduce the toxicity and recalcitrance of N and O-heterocyclic compounds during AD. Microaeration methods, which disrupt the AD microbiome less than ozone, might be more practical for nitrifying TAN and degrading recalcitrant compounds, but further research in this area is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":9067,"journal":{"name":"Bioresources and Bioprocessing","volume":"11 1","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11076452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaerobic digestion of process water from hydrothermal treatment processes: a review of inhibitors and detoxification approaches.\",\"authors\":\"Mei Zhou, Kayode Taiwo, Han Wang, Jean-Nepomuscene Ntihuga, Largus T Angenent, Joseph G Usack\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40643-024-00756-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Integrating hydrothermal treatment processes and anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising for maximizing resource recovery from biomass and organic waste. The process water generated during hydrothermal treatment contains high concentrations of organic matter, which can be converted into biogas using AD. However, process water also contains various compounds that inhibit the AD process. Fingerprinting these inhibitors and identifying suitable mitigation strategies and detoxification methods is necessary to optimize the integration of these two technologies. By examining the existing literature, we were able to: (1) compare the methane yields and organics removal efficiency during AD of various hydrothermal treatment process water; (2) catalog the main AD inhibitors found in hydrothermal treatment process water; (3) identify recalcitrant components limiting AD performance; and (4) evaluate approaches to detoxify specific inhibitors and degrade recalcitrant components. Common inhibitors in process water are organic acids (at high concentrations), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), oxygenated organics, and N-heterocyclic compounds. Feedstock composition is the primary determinant of organic acid and TAN formation (carbohydrates-rich and protein-rich feedstocks, respectively). In contrast, processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, reaction duration) influence the formation extent of oxygenated organics and N-heterocyclic compounds. Struvite precipitation and zeolite adsorption are the most widely used approaches to eliminate TAN inhibition. In contrast, powdered and granular activated carbon and ozonation are the preferred methods to remove toxic substances before AD treatment. Currently, ozonation is the most effective approach to reduce the toxicity and recalcitrance of N and O-heterocyclic compounds during AD. Microaeration methods, which disrupt the AD microbiome less than ozone, might be more practical for nitrifying TAN and degrading recalcitrant compounds, but further research in this area is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioresources and Bioprocessing\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11076452/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioresources and Bioprocessing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-024-00756-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioresources and Bioprocessing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-024-00756-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
将水热处理工艺与厌氧消化(AD)相结合,有望最大限度地从生物质和有机废物中回收资源。水热处理过程中产生的工艺水含有高浓度的有机物,可利用厌氧消化技术将其转化为沼气。然而,工艺水中也含有各种抑制厌氧消化(AD)工艺的化合物。要优化这两种技术的整合,就必须找出这些抑制剂,并确定合适的缓解策略和解毒方法。通过研究现有文献,我们能够(1) 比较各种热液处理工艺水在厌氧消化(AD)过程中的甲烷产量和有机物去除效率;(2) 对热液处理工艺水中发现的主要厌氧消化(AD)抑制剂进行分类;(3) 确定限制厌氧消化(AD)性能的难降解成分;以及 (4) 评估解毒特定抑制剂和降解难降解成分的方法。工艺水中常见的抑制剂有有机酸(高浓度)、总氨氮 (TAN)、含氧有机物和 N-杂环化合物。原料成分是有机酸和总氨氮形成的主要决定因素(分别为富含碳水化合物和富含蛋白质的原料)。相反,加工条件(如温度、压力、反应持续时间)会影响含氧有机物和 N-杂环化合物的形成程度。沸石沉淀和沸石吸附是消除 TAN 抑制最广泛使用的方法。相比之下,粉末状和颗粒状活性炭以及臭氧处理是在厌氧消化(AD)处理之前去除有毒物质的首选方法。目前,臭氧是在厌氧消化(AD)过程中降低 N 和 O-杂环化合物毒性和再抗性的最有效方法。与臭氧相比,微曝气法对厌氧消化(AD)微生物群的破坏较小,可能更适用于硝化总氮(TAN)和降解难降解化合物,但仍需在该领域开展进一步研究。
Anaerobic digestion of process water from hydrothermal treatment processes: a review of inhibitors and detoxification approaches.
Integrating hydrothermal treatment processes and anaerobic digestion (AD) is promising for maximizing resource recovery from biomass and organic waste. The process water generated during hydrothermal treatment contains high concentrations of organic matter, which can be converted into biogas using AD. However, process water also contains various compounds that inhibit the AD process. Fingerprinting these inhibitors and identifying suitable mitigation strategies and detoxification methods is necessary to optimize the integration of these two technologies. By examining the existing literature, we were able to: (1) compare the methane yields and organics removal efficiency during AD of various hydrothermal treatment process water; (2) catalog the main AD inhibitors found in hydrothermal treatment process water; (3) identify recalcitrant components limiting AD performance; and (4) evaluate approaches to detoxify specific inhibitors and degrade recalcitrant components. Common inhibitors in process water are organic acids (at high concentrations), total ammonia nitrogen (TAN), oxygenated organics, and N-heterocyclic compounds. Feedstock composition is the primary determinant of organic acid and TAN formation (carbohydrates-rich and protein-rich feedstocks, respectively). In contrast, processing conditions (e.g., temperature, pressure, reaction duration) influence the formation extent of oxygenated organics and N-heterocyclic compounds. Struvite precipitation and zeolite adsorption are the most widely used approaches to eliminate TAN inhibition. In contrast, powdered and granular activated carbon and ozonation are the preferred methods to remove toxic substances before AD treatment. Currently, ozonation is the most effective approach to reduce the toxicity and recalcitrance of N and O-heterocyclic compounds during AD. Microaeration methods, which disrupt the AD microbiome less than ozone, might be more practical for nitrifying TAN and degrading recalcitrant compounds, but further research in this area is necessary.
期刊介绍:
Bioresources and Bioprocessing (BIOB) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. BIOB aims at providing an international academic platform for exchanging views on and promoting research to support bioresource development, processing and utilization in a sustainable manner. As an application-oriented research journal, BIOB covers not only the application and management of bioresource technology but also the design and development of bioprocesses that will lead to new and sustainable production processes. BIOB publishes original and review articles on most topics relating to bioresource and bioprocess engineering, including: -Biochemical and microbiological engineering -Biocatalysis and biotransformation -Biosynthesis and metabolic engineering -Bioprocess and biosystems engineering -Bioenergy and biorefinery -Cell culture and biomedical engineering -Food, agricultural and marine biotechnology -Bioseparation and biopurification engineering -Bioremediation and environmental biotechnology