在转移性胰腺癌患者中识别原发肿瘤切除术的最佳候选者:基于人群的预测模型。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Cancer Investigation Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1080/07357907.2024.2349585
Kaifeng Su, Ruifeng Duan, Yang Wu
{"title":"在转移性胰腺癌患者中识别原发肿瘤切除术的最佳候选者:基于人群的预测模型。","authors":"Kaifeng Su, Ruifeng Duan, Yang Wu","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2024.2349585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a controversy about whether surgery should proceed among metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) patients. A survival benefit was observed in mPC patients who underwent primary tumor resection; however, determining which patients would benefit from surgery is complex. For this purpose, we created a model to identify mPC patients who may benefit from primary tumor excision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with mPC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, and separated into surgery and nonsurgery groups based on whether the primary tumor was resected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance confounding factors between the two groups. A nomogram was developed using multivariable logistic regression to estimate surgical benefit. Our model is evaluated using multiple methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 662 of 14,183 mPC patients had primary tumor surgery. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that the surgery group had a better prognosis. After PSM, a survival benefit was still observed in the surgery group. Among the surgery cohort, 202 patients survived longer than 4 months (surgery-beneficial group). The nomogram discriminated better in training and validation sets under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and calibration curves were consistent. Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that it was clinically valuable. This model is better at identifying candidates for primary tumor excision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A helpful prediction model was developed and validated to identify ideal candidates who may benefit from primary tumor resection in mPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"333-344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Optimal Candidates for Primary Tumor Resection Among Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Predictive Model.\",\"authors\":\"Kaifeng Su, Ruifeng Duan, Yang Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07357907.2024.2349585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a controversy about whether surgery should proceed among metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) patients. A survival benefit was observed in mPC patients who underwent primary tumor resection; however, determining which patients would benefit from surgery is complex. For this purpose, we created a model to identify mPC patients who may benefit from primary tumor excision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with mPC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, and separated into surgery and nonsurgery groups based on whether the primary tumor was resected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance confounding factors between the two groups. A nomogram was developed using multivariable logistic regression to estimate surgical benefit. Our model is evaluated using multiple methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 662 of 14,183 mPC patients had primary tumor surgery. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that the surgery group had a better prognosis. After PSM, a survival benefit was still observed in the surgery group. Among the surgery cohort, 202 patients survived longer than 4 months (surgery-beneficial group). The nomogram discriminated better in training and validation sets under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and calibration curves were consistent. Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that it was clinically valuable. This model is better at identifying candidates for primary tumor excision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A helpful prediction model was developed and validated to identify ideal candidates who may benefit from primary tumor resection in mPC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"333-344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2024.2349585\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2024.2349585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于转移性胰腺癌(mPC)患者是否应该接受手术治疗,一直存在争议。据观察,接受原发肿瘤切除术的胰腺癌患者可获得生存益处;然而,确定哪些患者可从手术中获益非常复杂。为此,我们创建了一个模型来识别可能从原发肿瘤切除术中获益的胰腺癌患者:方法:我们从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中提取了多发性骨髓瘤患者,并根据原发肿瘤是否切除将其分为手术组和非手术组。采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)平衡两组之间的混杂因素。采用多变量逻辑回归法绘制了一个提名图,以估计手术获益情况。我们采用多种方法对模型进行了评估:14183名mPC患者中约有662名接受了原发性肿瘤手术。卡普兰-梅耶尔分析显示,手术组预后较好。在 PSM 后,手术组患者的生存率仍然较高。在手术组中,有202名患者存活时间超过4个月(手术获益组)。在接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)(AUC)下,提名图在训练集和验证集中的判别能力更强,校准曲线也一致。决策曲线分析(DCA)显示该模型具有临床价值。该模型能更好地识别原发肿瘤切除术的候选者:结论:开发并验证了一种有用的预测模型,可用于确定可从原发性肿瘤切除术中获益的理想候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying Optimal Candidates for Primary Tumor Resection Among Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Predictive Model.

Background: There is a controversy about whether surgery should proceed among metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) patients. A survival benefit was observed in mPC patients who underwent primary tumor resection; however, determining which patients would benefit from surgery is complex. For this purpose, we created a model to identify mPC patients who may benefit from primary tumor excision.

Methods: Patients with mPC were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, and separated into surgery and nonsurgery groups based on whether the primary tumor was resected. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance confounding factors between the two groups. A nomogram was developed using multivariable logistic regression to estimate surgical benefit. Our model is evaluated using multiple methods.

Results: About 662 of 14,183 mPC patients had primary tumor surgery. Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that the surgery group had a better prognosis. After PSM, a survival benefit was still observed in the surgery group. Among the surgery cohort, 202 patients survived longer than 4 months (surgery-beneficial group). The nomogram discriminated better in training and validation sets under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), and calibration curves were consistent. Decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that it was clinically valuable. This model is better at identifying candidates for primary tumor excision.

Conclusion: A helpful prediction model was developed and validated to identify ideal candidates who may benefit from primary tumor resection in mPC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Investigation
Cancer Investigation 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.
期刊最新文献
Identification of Immune-Related Gene Pair Signature to Predict Prognosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Based on Bioinformatics Analyses. Glucose Metabolism and Glucose Transporters in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Attenuated Total Reflection-Fourier Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) Spectroscopy Analysis of Saliva as a Diagnostic Specimen for Rapid Classification of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Chemometrics Methods. Once-a-Week Ablative Radiotherapy as Replacement of Prolonged Fractionation in Frail Patients: Feasibility and Toxicity Results. Construction and Validation of a Novel T/NK-Cell Prognostic Signature for Pancreatic Cancer Based on Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1